Foraging patch selection by Snail Kites in response to vegetation structure and prey abundance and availability

被引:0
|
作者
Bennetts, RE
Darby, PC
Karunaratne, LB
机构
[1] USGS, Florida Integrated Sci Ctr, Gainesville, FL 32653 USA
[2] Univ W Florida, Dept Biol, Pensacola, FL 32514 USA
关键词
Rostrhamus sociabilis; Snail Kite; apple snail; foraging; habitat; Florida;
D O I
10.1675/1524-4695(2006)29[88:FPSBSK]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The role of food abundance and vegetation structure in selection of foraging habitat by the Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis) was explored. Selection of available foraging patches of either dense or sparse habitat structure within two prairie habitat types used extensively by foraging kites, Eleocharis flats and Panicum flats were examined. Estimated Apple Snail (Pomacea paludosa) densities on our study site ranged from 0.33 to 1.58 per m(2). Vegetation structure (sparse vs. dense) of the habitat type had a greater influence on where prey was captured than did site, the dominant emergent vegetation, or prey abundance. These results are consistent with previous suggestions that dense vegetation may obscure prey and limit or preclude use of densely vegetated habitats by foraging kites. This may be true, even when prey is in relatively high abundance, and may indicate the difference between prey abundance and availability. Most water management recommendations related to the Snail Kite call for prolonged inundation, based on an explicit assumption that this results in increased Apple Snail abundance. Even when directed at a single species such as the Snail Kite, water management may need to be considered in a more holistic framework that considers factors that influence the resulting vegetation communities, rather than just production of Apple Snails.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 94
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Taking movement data to new depths: Inferring prey availability and patch profitability from seabird foraging behavior
    Chimienti, Marianna
    Cornulier, Thomas
    Owen, Ellie
    Bolton, Mark
    Davies, Ian M.
    Travis, Justin M. J.
    Scott, Beth E.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 7 (23): : 10252 - 10265
  • [22] ESCAPE RESPONSE, PREY AVAILABILITY, AND FOOD SELECTION IN A KELP FOREST PREDATOR-PREY SYSTEM
    HARROLD, C
    AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 1980, 20 (04): : 884 - 884
  • [23] Urban lawn vegetation structure impact arthropod abundance and cattle egret foraging success
    Amissah, Carlos
    Iwajomo, Soladoye B.
    Abraham, John
    Deikumah, Justus P.
    SCIENTIFIC AFRICAN, 2024, 24
  • [24] Familiarity affects social network structure and discovery of prey patch locations in foraging stickleback shoals
    Atton, N.
    Galef, B. J.
    Hoppitt, W.
    Webster, M. M.
    Laland, K. N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 281 (1789)
  • [25] Prey abundance and patch usage for foraging by Buteo augur in the afroalpine habitats of the Bale Mountains National Park (BMNP), Ethiopia
    Shimelis, Anteneh
    Bekele, Afework
    Thirgood, Simon
    Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 2014, 13 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [26] Vegetation structure and prey abundance requirements of the Iberian lynx: implications for the design of reserves and corridors
    Palomares, F
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2001, 38 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [27] Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) prey selection in response to a variation of fish abundance
    Remonti, L.
    Prigioni, C.
    Balestrieri, A.
    Sgrosso, S.
    Priore, G.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2010, 77 (03) : 331 - 338
  • [28] Spatial variability in the abundance and prey selection of the corallivorous snail Drupella spp. in the southeastern Hainan Island, China
    Lei, Xinming
    Liu, Chengyue
    Zhang, Yuyang
    Yu, Xiaolei
    Yang, Jianhui
    Luo, Yong
    Zhou, Guowei
    Huang, Hui
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [29] Habitat selection in forest owls: The roles of vegetation structure, prey density and competitors
    Sharikov, A., V
    Tichonova, E., V
    ZHURNAL OBSHCHEI BIOLOGII, 2024, 85 (01): : 31 - 46
  • [30] Habitat Selection in Forest Owls: The Roles of Vegetation Structure, Prey Density, and Competitors
    A. V. Sharikov
    E. V. Tichonova
    Biology Bulletin Reviews, 2024, 14 (5) : 561 - 573