Comprehensive analysis of liquid-liquid phase separation-related genes in prediction of breast cancer prognosis

被引:5
|
作者
Yu-Qing, Huang [1 ,2 ]
Peng-Ping, Li [1 ,2 ]
Ke, Sun [1 ,2 ]
Ke-Xing, Yin [1 ,2 ]
Wei-Jun, Zhang [1 ,2 ]
Zhen-Yu, Wang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] First Peoples Hosp Xiaoshan, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Xaioshan Hosp, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
liquid-liquid phase separation; multi-gene risk-score; prediction model; breast cancer; TCGA; SIGNATURE;
D O I
10.3389/fgene.2022.834471
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective: Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a functional unit formed by specific molecules. It lacks a membrane and has been reported to play a crucial role in tumor drug resistance and growth by regulating gene expression and drug distribution. However, whether LLPS could be used to predict cancer prognosis was not clear. This study aimed to construct a prognostic model for breast cancer based on LLPS-correlated genes (LCGs). Methods: LCGs were identified using the PhaSepDB, gene expression profile and clinical characteristics of breast cancer were obtained from TCGA and cBioportal. The PanCancer Atlas (TCGA) cohort was used as the training cohort to construct the prognostic model, while the Nature 2012 and Nat Commun 2016 (TCGA) cohort and GEO data were used as test cohort to perform external verification. Data analysis was performed with R4.2.0 and SPSS20.0. Results: We identified 140 prognosis-related LCGs (pLCGs) (p < 0.01) in all cohorts, 240 pLCGs (p < 0.01) in the luminal cohort, and 28 pLCGs (p < 0.05) in the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohort. Twelve genes in all cohorts (training cohort: 5/10-year ROC values were 0.76 and 0.77; verification cohort: 5/10-year ROC values were 0.61 and 0.58), eight genes in the luminal cohort (training cohort: 5/10-year ROC values were 0.79 and 0.75; verification cohort: 5/10-year ROC values were 0.62 and 0.62), and four genes in the TNBC cohort (training cohort: 5/10-year ROC values were 0.73 and 0.79; verification cohort: 5/10-year ROC values were 0.55 and 0.54) were screened out to construct the prognostic prediction model. The 17-gene risk-score was constructed in all cohorts (1/3/5-year ROC values were 0.88, 0.83, and 0.81), and the 11-gene risk-score was constructed in the luminal cohort (1/3/5-year ROC values were 0.67, 0.85 and 0.84), and the six-gene risk-score was constructed in the TNBC cohort (1/3/5-year ROC value were 0.87, 0.88 and 0.81). Finally, the risk-score and clinical factors were applied to construct nomograms in all cohorts (1/3/5-year ROC values were 0.89, 0.79 and 0.75, C-index = 0.784), in the luminal cohort (1/3/5-year ROC values were 0.84, 0.83 and 0.85, C-index = 0.803), and in the TNBC cohort (1/3/5-year ROC values were 0.95, 0.84 and 0.77, C-index = 0.847). Discussion: This study explored the roles of LCGs in the prediction of breast cancer prognosis.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nuclear microenvironment in cancer: Control through liquid-liquid phase separation
    Nozawa, Ryu-Suke
    Yamamoto, Tatsuro
    Takahashi, Motoko
    Tachiwana, Hiroaki
    Maruyama, Reo
    Hirota, Toru
    Saitoh, Noriko
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2020, 111 (09) : 3155 - 3163
  • [42] Role of liquid-liquid phase separation in cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications
    Li, Xuesong
    Yu, Zhuo
    CANCER INNOVATION, 2024, 3 (05):
  • [43] The liquid-liquid phase separation signature predicts the prognosis and immunotherapy response in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Wang, Zhiyong
    Wang, Guoliang
    Zhao, Peng
    Sun, Ping
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 28 (14)
  • [44] Thermokinetics of reactions with liquid-liquid phase separation
    Baumann, C
    Becker, F
    BERICHTE DER BUNSEN-GESELLSCHAFT-PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 100 (08): : 1335 - 1340
  • [45] Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in Cardiovascular Diseases
    Mo, Yuanxi
    Feng, Yuliang
    Huang, Wei
    Tan, Ning
    Li, Xinyi
    Jie, Minwen
    Feng, Tong
    Jiang, Hao
    Jiang, Lei
    CELLS, 2022, 11 (19)
  • [46] Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in an Elastic Network
    Style, Robert W.
    Sai, Tianqi
    Fanelli, Nicolo
    Ijavi, Mahdiye
    Smith-Mannschott, Katrina
    Xu, Qin
    Wilen, Lawrence A.
    Dufresne, Eric R.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW X, 2018, 8 (01):
  • [47] Liquid-liquid Phase Separation in Viral Function
    Zhang, Xiaoyue
    Zheng, Run
    Li, Zhengshuo
    Ma, Jian
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2023, 435 (16)
  • [48] Biomolecular Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation for Biotechnology
    Shil, Sumit
    Tsuruta, Mitsuki
    Kawauchi, Keiko
    Miyoshi, Daisuke
    BIOTECH, 2023, 12 (02):
  • [49] Liquid-liquid phase separation in tumor biology
    Tong, Xuhui
    Tang, Rong
    Xu, Jin
    Wang, Wei
    Zhao, Yingjun
    Yu, Xianjun
    Shi, Si
    SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND TARGETED THERAPY, 2022, 7 (01)
  • [50] Spontaneous liquid-liquid phase separation of water
    Yagasaki, Takuma
    Matsumoto, Masakazu
    Tanaka, Hideki
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2014, 89 (02):