Radial scars and subsequent breast cancer risk: results from the Nurses' Health Studies

被引:30
|
作者
Aroner, Sarah A. [1 ]
Collins, Laura C. [2 ,3 ]
Connolly, James L. [2 ,3 ]
Colditz, Graham A. [4 ]
Schnitt, Stuart J. [2 ,3 ]
Rosner, Bernard A. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Hankinson, Susan E. [3 ,5 ,7 ]
Tamimi, Rulla M. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Channing Div Network Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Sci, Div Biostat & Epidemiol, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Benign breast disease; Breast cancer; Breast pathology; Nested case-control; Radial scars; ATYPICAL HYPERPLASIA; MALIGNANT BREAST; NUCLEAR-ORGANIZATION; TUBULAR CARCINOMA; TISSUE STRUCTURE; GENE-EXPRESSION; DISEASE; LESIONS; BIOPSIES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-013-2535-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Radial scars (RS) are benign proliferative lesions associated with an increased risk of subsequent breast cancer. However, it remains unclear whether RS are an independent risk factor for breast cancer or whether their association with breast cancer is due to their common occurrence with other proliferative lesions known to increase breast cancer risk. We performed an updated analysis of the association between RS and subsequent breast cancer risk in a nested case-control study among 460 cases and 1,792 controls with benign breast disease (BBD) in the Nurses' Health Studies. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations between RS in BBD biopsy specimens and breast cancer risk, adjusted for matching factors and breast cancer risk factors, including histologic category of concurrent BBD. In multivariable models prior to adjustment for histologic category of BBD, RS were associated with a twofold increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 2.0; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 1.4, 2.8). This association was attenuated but still significant after adjustment for BBD histologic category (OR = 1.6; 95 % CI 1.1, 2.3). In models adjusted for BBD histologic category and other covariates, risk appeared greater among women with multiple RS (1 RS, OR = 1.5; 95 % CI 0.9, 2.3; a parts per thousand yen2 RS, OR = 2.7; 95 % CI 1.5, 5.0; p-heterogeneity = 0.12). There were also suggestions of a greater risk associated with RS among women age a parts per thousand yen50 years at biopsy (p-heterogeneity = 0.07) and for estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-negative tumors compared with other hormone receptor subtypes (p-heterogeneity = 0.19). RS appear to be an independent histologic risk factor for breast cancer. Larger studies are needed to further evaluate whether risk is increased when multiple RS are present and whether associations vary by age at biopsy or by hormone receptor status of the breast tumor.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 285
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Parity, breastfeeding, and breast cancer risk by hormone receptor status and molecular phenotype: results from the Nurses’ Health Studies
    Renée T. Fortner
    Julia Sisti
    Boyang Chai
    Laura C. Collins
    Bernard Rosner
    Susan E. Hankinson
    Rulla M. Tamimi
    A. Heather Eliassen
    Breast Cancer Research, 21
  • [32] Radial scars in benign breast-biopsy specimens and the risk of breast cancer
    Jacobs, TW
    Byrne, C
    Colditz, G
    Connolly, JL
    Schnitt, SJ
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (06): : 430 - 436
  • [33] Healthful and Unhealthful Plant-Based Diets and Risk of Breast Cancer in US Women: Results from the Nurses' Health Studies
    Romanos-Nanclares, Andrea
    Willett, Walter C.
    Rosner, Bernard A.
    Collins, Laura C.
    Hu, Frank B.
    Toledo, Estefania
    Eliassen, A. Heather
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2021, 30 (10) : 1921 - 1931
  • [34] Breast cancer risk by extent and type of atypical hyperplasia: An update from the Nurses' Health Studies
    Collins, Laura C.
    Aroner, Sarah A.
    Connolly, James L.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Schnitt, Stuart J.
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    CANCER, 2016, 122 (04) : 515 - 520
  • [35] Breast Cancer Risk by Extent and Type of Atypical Hyperplasia: An Update From the Nurses' Health Studies
    Day, S.
    Bevers, T. B.
    BREAST DISEASES, 2016, 27 (04): : 264 - 265
  • [36] Sexually transmitted infections and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: Results from the Nurses' Health Studies
    Fortner, Renee Turzanski
    Terry, Kathryn L.
    Bender, Noemi
    Waterboer, Tim
    Tworoger, Shelley S.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (13)
  • [37] Sexually transmitted infections and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: results from the Nurses’ Health Studies
    Renée T. Fortner
    Kathryn L. Terry
    Noemi Bender
    Nicole Brenner
    Katrin Hufnagel
    Julia Butt
    Tim Waterboer
    Shelley S. Tworoger
    British Journal of Cancer, 2019, 120 : 855 - 860
  • [38] Sexually transmitted infections and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: results from the Nurses' Health Studies
    Fortner, Renee T.
    Terry, Kathryn L.
    Benders, Noemi
    Brenner, Nicole
    Hufnagel, Katrin
    Butt, Julia
    Waterboer, Tim
    Tworoger, Shelley S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 120 (08) : 855 - 860
  • [39] RADIAL SCARS IN WOMEN WITH BREAST-CANCER
    NIELSEN, M
    CHRISTENSEN, L
    ANDERSEN, J
    CANCER, 1987, 59 (05) : 1019 - 1025
  • [40] Premenopausal endogenous steroid hormones and breast cancer risk: results from the Nurses' Health Study II
    Fortner, Renee T.
    Eliassen, A. Heather
    Spiegelman, Donna
    Willett, Walter C.
    Barbieri, Robert L.
    Hankinson, Susan E.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (02):