OUTLINE OF GUIDELINE FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS METHOD USING 3D FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF REACTOR BUILDING

被引:0
|
作者
Choi, Byunghyun [1 ]
Nishida, Akemi [1 ]
Shiomi, Tadahiko [1 ]
Kawataand, Manabu [1 ]
Li, Yinsheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Japan Atom Energy Agcy, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
Guideline; Seismic response analysis; 3D FE model; Reactor building;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
In the seismic safety assessment and design of building structures in nuclear facilities, lumped mass models are conventionally used. However, they cannot possess the required high-accuracy evaluation of nuclear facilities, such as the local response at the equipment location in a reactor building. From this point of view, a seismic response analysis method using a three-dimensional finite element (3D FE) model is indispensable. Furthermore, because analysis results obtained using 3D FE models vary to a large degree depending on the experience and knowledge of analysts, the quality of analysis results should be ensured by developing a standard analysis method. In the Japan Atomic Energy Agency, we have developed a guideline for seismic response analysis methods that adopt 3D FE models of reactor buildings, and we plan to publish it as JAEA report. The guideline consists of a main body, commentary, and several appendixes; it also includes procedures, recommendations, points of attention, and a technical basis for conducting seismic response analysis using 3D FE models of reactor buildings. In this paper, the outline of the guideline and analysis examples based on the guideline are presented.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimization method for 3D bracing correction of scoliosis using a finite element model
    Gignac, D
    Aubin, CÉ
    Dansereau, J
    Labelle, H
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2000, 9 (03) : 185 - 190
  • [22] Abfraction: 3D analysis by means of the finite element method
    Geramy, A
    Sharafoddin, F
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 34 (07): : 526 - 533
  • [23] An equivalent beam method to model masonry buildings in 3D finite element analysis
    Pickhaver, J. A.
    Burd, H. J.
    Houlsby, G. T.
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2010, 88 (19-20) : 1049 - 1063
  • [24] Analytical study of performance evaluation for seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete building using 3D dynamic nonlinear finite element analysis
    Yuichi Sato
    Shinichi Kajihara
    Yoshio Kaneko
    EarthquakeEngineeringandEngineeringVibration, 2011, 10 (02) : 291 - 302
  • [25] Analytical study of performance evaluation for seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete building using 3D dynamic nonlinear finite element analysis
    Yuichi Sato
    Shinichi Kajihara
    Yoshio Kaneko
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2011, 10 : 291 - 302
  • [26] Analytical study of performance evaluation for seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete building using 3D dynamic nonlinear finite element analysis
    Sato, Yuichi
    Kajihara, Shinichi
    Kaneko, Yoshio
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2011, 10 (02) : 291 - 302
  • [27] Dynamic analysis method of spherical resonant actuator using 3D finite element method
    Suzuki, Satoshi
    Yamaguchi, Tadashi
    Kawase, Yoshihiro
    Sato, Koichi
    Kakami, Shuhei
    Hirata, Katsuhiro
    Ota, Tomohiro
    Hasegawa, Yuya
    COMPEL-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR COMPUTATION AND MATHEMATICS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2010, 29 (05) : 1195 - 1204
  • [28] Building and visualization of 3D seismic model
    Zhao, Bo
    Meng, Xiao-Hong
    Hou, Jian-Quan
    Diqiu Kexue - Zhongguo Dizhi Daxue Xuebao/Earth Science - Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2007, 32 (04): : 549 - 553
  • [29] New electrical parameters extraction method based on simplified 3D model using finite element analysis
    Gonzalez-Teodoro, Jorge Rafael
    Romero-Cadaval, Enrique Gonzalez
    Asensi, Rafael
    Prieto, Roberto
    Kindl, Vladimir
    COMPEL-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR COMPUTATION AND MATHEMATICS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2020, 39 (02) : 297 - 316