Face-to-face, Blended or Online: How Do Students Prefer to Study?

被引:3
|
作者
Margolis, Arkady A. [1 ]
Sorokova, Marina G. [1 ]
Shvedovskaya, Anna A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ MSUPE, Moscow, Russia
关键词
vaccination; COVID-19; prevention; vaccination attitude; blended learning; distance learning; face-to-face learning; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.17759/pse.2022270501
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The article presents the findings of a study on the learning format preferences in students of the Moscow State University of Psychology & Education (N=761) in February-March 2022 . Face-to-face learning (FTF) was chosen by 10,8% of stu-dents, blended learning (lectures in distance format, seminars and practical classes in-person) (BL) - 39,7%, distance learning (DL) - 49,5% . There were no differ-ences between the 3 groups by gender and age . In the BL group, compared to the DL group, logical thinking (p=0,001) and verbal intelligence (p=0,003) are bet-ter developed, natural science literacy rates are higher (p=0,018), there is a better understanding of the vaccination benefits against COVID-19 for the individual and society (p=0,016) and less confidence in serious negative consequences of the coro-navirus vaccine (p=0,005) . In the FTF group, compared to the DL group, there is a lower fear of COVID-19 disease (p=0,050) and a higher estimate of the vaccination benefits against COVID-19 for an individual and society (p=0,050) . Cluster analysis using K-means method identified 2 clusters . Cluster 1 includes respondents with more developed logical thinking, verbal intelligence, better natural science literacy, better understanding of the vaccination benefits against COVID-19 for a person and society and less prone to various fears, doubts, underestimation of the danger of coronavirus and distrust of vaccination . In Cluster 1, as compared to Cluster 2, the share of respondents preferring BL prevails (44,4% vs 37,1%), and the share of those who prefer DF is lower (43,8% vs 52,6%); the differences are significant at the trend level. The shares of respondents preferring FTF are practically the same and make up only about 10%. Using the method of logistic regression analysis, 4 statistically significant predictors were identified and a model was built to predict the respondents' choice of the BL vs DL. The older the respondent, the more pronounced his/her fear of COVID-19, the lower his/her logical thinking, and the less confident (s)he is in the vaccination benefits against coronavirus for the individual and society, the more likely (s)he is to prefer DL over BL. Conversely, BL is more likely to be preferred over DL by younger respondents with higher logical reasoning scores, less fear of COVID-19 disease, and greater confidence in the vaccination benefits against coronavirus for the individual and society. The overall prediction accuracy of the model is 60,4%.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 20
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Students' Perception of Online Versus Face-to-Face Learning: What Do the Healthcare Teachers Have to Know?
    Siddiqui, Ammar Ahmed
    Ul Abideen, Malik Zain
    Fatima, Saman
    Khan, Muhammad Talal
    Gillani, Syed W.
    Alrefai, Zeyad A.
    Hussain, Muhammad Waqar
    Rathore, Hassaan A.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [32] A Comparative Study of an Online and a Face-to-Face Chemistry Course
    Gulacar, Ozcan
    Damkaci, Fehmi
    Bowman, Charles R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE ONLINE LEARNING, 2013, 12 (01): : 27 - 40
  • [33] Online or face-to-face? An experimental study of examiner training
    Chamberlain, Suzanne
    Taylor, Rachel
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 42 (04) : 665 - 675
  • [34] Do women prefer face-to-face treatment for insomnia? Gender-specific aspects of the utilization of online counselling for sleep disorders
    Retzer, Lukas
    Reindl, Richard
    Zauter, Sigrid
    Richter, Kneginja
    [J]. SOMNOLOGIE, 2021, 25 (02): : 151 - 154
  • [35] Towards Effective Blended Learning Through the Eyes of Students: A Survey Study in Transition into Face-to-Face Education
    Astudillo, Gabriel
    Hilliger, Isabel
    Rodriguez, Fernanda
    Baier, Jorge
    [J]. EDUCATING FOR A NEW FUTURE: MAKING SENSE OF TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED LEARNING ADOPTION, EC-TEL 2022, 2022, 13450 : 492 - 499
  • [36] Online versus face-to-face - how do video consultations associate with the doctor-patient-interaction?
    Kendel, Friederike
    Hilger, Caren
    Woldai, Selamawit
    Feufel, Markus
    [J]. ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 45 (SUPPL 3) : 211 - 211
  • [37] Entrepreneurial intentions: trust and network ties in online and face-to-face students
    Perez-Macias, Noemi
    Luis Fernandez-Fernandez, Jose
    Rua Vieites, Antonio
    [J]. EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2019, 61 (04): : 461 - 479
  • [38] Teamwork Efficacy and Attitude Differences between Online and Face-to-Face Students
    Vance, Kara
    Kulturel-Konak, Sadan
    Konak, Abdullah
    [J]. 2015 5th IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), 2015, : 246 - 251
  • [39] Undergraduate students' attitudes towards online versus face-to-face counseling
    Cui, Lixia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 267 - 267
  • [40] How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: conceptions, intentions and approaches
    Ellis, R. A.
    Goodyear, P.
    Prosser, M.
    O'Hara, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2006, 22 (04) : 244 - 256