Face-to-face, Blended or Online: How Do Students Prefer to Study?

被引:3
|
作者
Margolis, Arkady A. [1 ]
Sorokova, Marina G. [1 ]
Shvedovskaya, Anna A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ MSUPE, Moscow, Russia
关键词
vaccination; COVID-19; prevention; vaccination attitude; blended learning; distance learning; face-to-face learning; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.17759/pse.2022270501
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The article presents the findings of a study on the learning format preferences in students of the Moscow State University of Psychology & Education (N=761) in February-March 2022 . Face-to-face learning (FTF) was chosen by 10,8% of stu-dents, blended learning (lectures in distance format, seminars and practical classes in-person) (BL) - 39,7%, distance learning (DL) - 49,5% . There were no differ-ences between the 3 groups by gender and age . In the BL group, compared to the DL group, logical thinking (p=0,001) and verbal intelligence (p=0,003) are bet-ter developed, natural science literacy rates are higher (p=0,018), there is a better understanding of the vaccination benefits against COVID-19 for the individual and society (p=0,016) and less confidence in serious negative consequences of the coro-navirus vaccine (p=0,005) . In the FTF group, compared to the DL group, there is a lower fear of COVID-19 disease (p=0,050) and a higher estimate of the vaccination benefits against COVID-19 for an individual and society (p=0,050) . Cluster analysis using K-means method identified 2 clusters . Cluster 1 includes respondents with more developed logical thinking, verbal intelligence, better natural science literacy, better understanding of the vaccination benefits against COVID-19 for a person and society and less prone to various fears, doubts, underestimation of the danger of coronavirus and distrust of vaccination . In Cluster 1, as compared to Cluster 2, the share of respondents preferring BL prevails (44,4% vs 37,1%), and the share of those who prefer DF is lower (43,8% vs 52,6%); the differences are significant at the trend level. The shares of respondents preferring FTF are practically the same and make up only about 10%. Using the method of logistic regression analysis, 4 statistically significant predictors were identified and a model was built to predict the respondents' choice of the BL vs DL. The older the respondent, the more pronounced his/her fear of COVID-19, the lower his/her logical thinking, and the less confident (s)he is in the vaccination benefits against coronavirus for the individual and society, the more likely (s)he is to prefer DL over BL. Conversely, BL is more likely to be preferred over DL by younger respondents with higher logical reasoning scores, less fear of COVID-19 disease, and greater confidence in the vaccination benefits against coronavirus for the individual and society. The overall prediction accuracy of the model is 60,4%.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 20
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] VIRTUAL OR FACE-TO-FACE TUTORIALS: WHICH DO UNIVERSITY STUDENTS PREFER?
    Hernandez Amors, Maria Jose
    Iglesias Martinez, Marcos Jesus
    Lozano Cabezas, Ines
    [J]. INTED2016: 10TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2016, : 2263 - 2270
  • [2] How to Decide the Proportion of Online to Face-to-Face Components of a Blended Course? A Delphi Study
    Alammary, Ali Saleh
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [3] How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic?
    Mali, Dafydd
    Lim, Hyoungjoo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2021, 19 (03):
  • [4] Students who prefer face-to-face tests outperform their online peers in organic chemistry
    Beatty, Abby E.
    Esco, Abby
    Curtiss, Ashley B. C.
    Ballen, Cissy J.
    [J]. CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2022, 23 (02) : 464 - 474
  • [5] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BLENDED FACE-TO-FACE AND HYBRID ONLINE PHYSICAL SCIENCE COURSES
    Sertsu, Sahlemedhin
    Chacon, Fabio
    Lawrence, William
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (EDULEARN17), 2017, : 7640 - 7649
  • [6] Face-to-face, online, or blended: which method is more effective in teaching electrocardiogram to medical students
    Bazrgar, Aida
    Rahmanian, Mahdi
    Ghaedi, Arshin
    Heidari, Ali
    Bazrafshan, Mehdi
    Amini, Mitra
    Bazrafshan, Hanieh
    Ahmadpour, Mahsa
    Bazrafshan Drissi, Hamed
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [7] The Analysis of Influencing Factors of College Students' Learning Effect in Face-to-Face, Online and Blended Learning
    Tong, Jun
    Han, Jun
    Liu, Jing
    Yang, Fan
    Chen, Shuo
    [J]. NETWORK COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SECURITY, 2012, 345 : 528 - 538
  • [8] Face-to-face, online, or blended: which method is more effective in teaching electrocardiogram to medical students
    Aida Bazrgar
    Mahdi Rahmanian
    Arshin Ghaedi
    Ali Heidari
    Mehdi Bazrafshan
    Mitra Amini
    Hanieh Bazrafshan
    Mahsa Ahmadpour
    Hamed Bazrafshan drissi
    [J]. BMC Medical Education, 23
  • [9] Do Patients Prefer Face-to-Face or Internet-Based Therapy?
    Berle, David
    Starcevic, Vladan
    Milicevic, Denise
    Hannan, Anthony
    Dale, Erin
    Brakoulias, Vlasios
    Viswasam, Kirupamani
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2015, 84 (01) : 61 - 62
  • [10] Differences Between Blended and Face-To-Face Teaching in Students' Perception
    de Checchi, Kevin
    Bachtold, Manuel
    Asensio, Dominique Barbe
    Papet, Jacqueline
    Roebroeck, Elodie
    Huang, Yuanfei
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2024,