Proposal for a sustainability evaluation framework for bioenergy production systems using the MESMIS methodology

被引:15
|
作者
Valdez-Vazquez, Idania [1 ]
Sanchez Gastelum, Carolina del Rosario [2 ]
Escalante, Ana E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ingn, Unidad Acad Juriquilla, Blvd Juriquilla 3001, Queretaro 76230, Mexico
[2] Colegio Frontera Norte, Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ecol, Lab Nacl Ciencias Sostenibilidad LANCIS, Ciudad Univ, Mexico City 045010, DF, Mexico
来源
关键词
Biomass; Biofuels; Index; Indicators; Sustainability gradient; BIOFUELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.136
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The bioenergy economy promises to stimulate the local economic growth and improve the welfare of people living in rural areas. To accomplish this, there is global consensus on the sustainability indicators that must be evaluated in bioenergy production systems (BPSs). However, the utilization of these indicators has several constraints, such as their interpretation and application in developing countries in addition to the inherent complexity of BPSs. Here, we propose a sustainability framework applicable to BPSs. First, we use the framework for assessing the sustainability of the natural resource management systems (MESMIS) methodology to define a BPS and derive economic, environmental and social indicators. After that, we use the distance-to-target weighting method to describe a sustainability gradient of five levels for each indicator. Finally, we use the sustainability gradient to normalize the indicators and thereby weight and aggregate the indicators into a sustainability index (SI). After the application of the MESMIS methodology, a BPS was defined as three interrelated subsystems; 1) the biomass subsystem dedicated to the feedstock supply; 2) the transformation subsystem dedicated to convert the feedstock into bioenergy; and 3) the social subsystem that provides the workforce. This sustainability framework allows comparing two (or more) BPSs in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. A total of 7 economic indicators, 10 environmental indicators and 11 social indicators were described in terms of a sustainability gradient. The sustainability gradient converts the indicators to comparable units. Then, we propose to aggregate these indicators into three subindices by evaluated area: an economic subindex, an environmental subindex, and a social subindex. Each subindex ranges from 0 for an unsustainable BPS to 5 for a highly sustainable BPS. The SI integrates these three subindices, giving the same relevance to the economic, environmental and social areas.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 369
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Evaluation of Holistic Sustainability Assessment Framework for Palm Oil Production in Malaysia
    Lim, Chye Ing
    Biswas, Wahidul
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (12) : 16561 - 16587
  • [32] Digital manufacturing systems: a framework to improve social sustainability of a production site
    Gregori, Fabio
    Papetti, Alessandra
    Pandolfi, Monica
    Peruzzini, Margherita
    Germani, Michele
    [J]. MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS 4.0, 2017, 63 : 436 - 442
  • [33] A proposal for the evaluation of the bioeconomic efficiency of beef cattle production systems
    Marques, Pedro Rocha
    Peripolli, Vanessa
    Lampert, Vinicius do Nascimento
    Dias, Eduardo Antunes
    Pereira, Gabriel Ribas
    de Oliveira, Tamara Esteves
    da Rocha, Marcela Kuczynski
    Jardim Barcellos, Julio Otavio
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2017, 46 (01): : 65 - 71
  • [34] Proposal of Methodology for Evaluation of Ergonomics of Teaching Materials Using Eye Tracking
    Smolka, Pavel
    Zacek, Martin
    Konecna, Petra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2020, 15 (24) : 4 - 14
  • [35] Developing post occupancy evaluation sustainability assessment framework for retrofitting commercial office buildings: A proposal
    Shika, Suleiman Aliyu
    Sapri, Maimunah
    Jibril, Jibril Dan'azimi
    Sipan, Ibrahim
    Abdullah, Shahabudin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON INTERDISCIPLINARY BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 2012 (ICIBSOS 2012), 2012, 65 : 644 - 649
  • [36] Sustainability of rice production systems: an empirical evaluation to improve policy
    Ranjan Roy
    Ngai Weng Chan
    Stefanos Xenarios
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2016, 18 : 257 - 278
  • [37] Sustainability of rice production systems: an empirical evaluation to improve policy
    Roy, Ranjan
    Chan, Ngai Weng
    Xenarios, Stefanos
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 18 (01) : 257 - 278
  • [38] A Potential Framework for Integration of Architecture and Methodology to Improve Statistical Production Systems
    Eltinge, John L.
    Biemer, Paul P.
    Holmberg, Anders
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS, 2013, 29 (01) : 125 - 145
  • [39] Competitiveness Evaluation Methodology for Aviation Industry Sustainability Using Network DEA
    Song, Ki Han
    Choi, Solsaem
    Han, Ik Hyun
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (24) : 1 - 16
  • [40] Framework proposal for the design of lean circular production systems based on case studies
    Muyulema-Allaica, Juan-Carlos
    Ruiz-Puente, Carmen
    [J]. DYNA, 2022, 97 (05): : 515 - 521