How relevant is the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to nursing care?

被引:5
|
作者
Geurden, Bart J. G. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Stern, Cindy [4 ]
Piron, Cecile [5 ]
Gobert, Micheline [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Karel de Grote Univ Coll, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Dutch Cochrane Ctr, Belgian Branch, Ctr Evidence Based Med CEBAM, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth Sci, Cochrane Nursing Care Field, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Catholic Univ Louvain, Inst Res Hlth & Soc, Nursing Res PRISCI, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Cochrane; evidence-based nursing; nurses; nursing care; systematic review; BARRIERS; NURSES; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1111/ijn.12012
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Barriers obstructing evidence-based nursing have been explored in many countries. Lack of resources and evidence has been noted as one of these barriers. We aimed to identify nursing care-related systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 1996 until 2009. Using a broad search strategy we identified titles of Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols that focused on nursing care. The abstract of each title was examined and predetermined data were collected and analysed. 1249 titles out of a possible 6244 records were identified as being relevant to nursing care. Most of them focused on newborn and adult populations and related to comparing one intervention with another, and management strategies. The most common nursing specialties represented were internal medicine (34%) and mother and child care (25%). Twenty one percent of reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews are of direct interest to those involved in nursing care however their relevance was not always obvious.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 526
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews related to wound care: An investigation into prespecification
    Liu, Zhenmi
    Saldanha, Ian J.
    Margolis, David
    Dumville, Jo C.
    Cullum, Nicky A.
    [J]. WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2017, 25 (02) : 292 - 308
  • [43] Summaries of Nursing Care-Related Systematic Reviews from the Cochrane Library Ear drops for the removal of ear wax
    Rojahn, Ruth
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2010, 8 (03): : 151 - 152
  • [44] Representation of the top three most disabling skin diseases in the cochrane database of systematic reviews
    Karimkhani, C.
    Boyers, L. N.
    Dunnick, C. A.
    Dellavalle, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 134 : S50 - S50
  • [45] Process of developing systematic reviews, including Cochrane reviews
    Bala, Malgorzata M.
    Lesniak, Wiktoria
    Jaeschke, Roman
    [J]. POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 125 : 16 - 25
  • [46] NOT ALL COCHRANE REVIEWS ARE GOOD QUALITY SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
    Deshpande, S.
    Misso, K.
    Westwood, M.
    Stirk, L.
    de Kock, S.
    Kleijnen, J.
    Clayton, D.
    Kleijnen, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A371 - A371
  • [47] Introduction of Cochrane systematic reviews in nutrition
    Lopese, Katharina da Silva
    Watanabe, Norio
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2023, 79 : 262 - 262
  • [48] Cochrane systematic reviews in cystic fibrosis
    Smyth, Rosalind
    Jahnke, Nicola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2006, 99 : 6 - 12
  • [49] Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
    Nasser, Mona
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 110 (06) : 753 - 754
  • [50] Cochrane systematic reviews: contributions and perspectives
    Boutron, Isabelle
    [J]. JOINT BONE SPINE, 2019, 86 (03) : 289 - 291