The efficacy of psychosocial intervention for pain in breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:76
|
作者
Johannsen, M. [1 ,2 ]
Farver, I. [1 ,2 ]
Beck, N. [3 ]
Zachariae, R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Psychol & Behav Sci, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Natl Res Ctr Psychotraumatol, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
关键词
Psychosocial interventions; Pain; Breast cancer; Meta-analysis; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; EXPRESSIVE GROUP-THERAPY; PUBLICATION BIAS; RISK-FACTORS; PERSISTENT PAIN; SUPPORT; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; TESTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-013-2503-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment is prevalent, and not all patients respond sufficiently to pharmacological treatment. Pain is recognized as a multi-dimensional phenomenon, which includes psychological and social components, and several clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of psychosocial interventions on pain in cancer patients and survivors. Our aim was to systematically review and quantify the existing research on the effect of psychosocial interventions on pain in breast cancer patients and survivors. Two independent raters reviewed 474 abstracts for eligibility, leading to the identification of 26 independent and eligible studies published between 1983 and 2012, which were assessed for their methodological quality and subjected to meta-analytic evaluation. A total of 1786 participants were included in the analyses. A statistically significant and robust overall effect size was found across all included studies (Hedges g = 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.20-0.40; p < 0.001). However, the effect size was considerably smaller (0.21), when adjusted for possible publication bias. Furthermore, the results were heterogeneous, and when exploring the sources of heterogeneity, studies of higher methodological quality were found to yield a more conservative effect size (g = 0.21, 95 % CI: 0.02-0.41) than studies of poorer quality (g = 0.65, 95 % CI: 0.25-1.04). The results also indicated that patient educational approaches yielded a larger effect size (g = 0.64) than relaxation-based interventions (g = 0.31, 95 % CI: -0.05-0.67) and supportive group therapy (g = 0.17, 95 % CI: 0.02-0.32). Taken together, while suggestive of psychosocial intervention as an effective tool in the management of pain among breast cancer patients and survivors, the results should be interpreted as preliminary. The methodological quality of the existing research varied considerably, and only few studies had selected patients on the basis of the presence of pain and included pain as the primary outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 690
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Manual Therapy as Treatment for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Female Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    da Silva, Fabiana Pinheiro
    Moreira, Gessica Maria
    Zomkowski, Kamilla
    de Noronha, Marcos Amaral
    Sperandio, Fabiana Flores
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 42 (07) : 503 - 513
  • [32] Effect of Myofascial Therapy on Pain and Functionality of the Upper Extremities in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lara-Palomo, Inmaculada Carmen
    Castro-Sanchez, Adelaida Maria
    Cordoba-Pelaez, Marta Maria
    Albornoz-Cabello, Manuel
    Ortiz-Comino, Lucia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (09)
  • [33] The efficacy of psychosocial interventions among women following surgical treatment for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Matthews, H.
    Grunfeld, B.
    Turner, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 57 : S151 - S151
  • [34] The efficacy of interventions to improve psychosocial outcomes following surgical treatment for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Matthews, Hannah
    Grunfeld, Elizabeth A.
    Turner, Andrew
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 26 (05) : 593 - 607
  • [35] Sarcopenia in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Roberto, Michela
    Barchiesi, Giacomo
    Resuli, Blerina
    Verrico, Monica
    Speranza, Iolanda
    Cristofani, Leonardo
    Pediconi, Federica
    Tomao, Federica
    Botticelli, Andrea
    Santini, Daniele
    [J]. CANCERS, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [36] Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Chinese Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Anao
    Jing, Shijie
    Solomon, Phyllis
    Brose, Anna
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2021, 31 (07) : 683 - 692
  • [37] The Effects of Depression Intervention Programs for Breast Cancer Patients in Korea : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hyun-Joo, Park
    Gyeong, Son Hye
    [J]. ASIAN ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2020, 20 (04) : 150 - 159
  • [38] Lack of Efficacy of Tai Chi in Improving Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yan, Jun-Hong
    Pan, Lei
    Zhang, Xiao-Min
    Sun, Cui-Xiang
    Cui, Guang-He
    [J]. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (08) : 3715 - 3720
  • [39] Physical activity in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis on overall and breast cancer survival
    Spei, Maria-Eleni
    Samoli, Evangelia
    Bravi, Francesca
    La Vecchia, Carlo
    Bamia, Christina
    Benetou, Vassiliki
    [J]. BREAST, 2019, 44 : 144 - 152
  • [40] Psychosocial interventions for childhood cancer survivors: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials
    Arpaci, Tuba
    Altay, Naime
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2024, 69