Peri-implant conditions and marginal bone loss around cemented and screw-retained single implant crowns in posterior regions: A retrospective cohort study with up to 4 years follow-up

被引:17
|
作者
Shi, Jun-Yu [1 ]
Jie-Ni [1 ]
Zhuang, Long-fei [2 ]
Zhang, Xiao-Meng [1 ]
Fan, Lin-Feng [3 ]
Lai, Hong-Chang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Dept Dent Implantat,Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Adore Dent Care, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Dept Radiol,Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
COMPLICATION RATES; SUPPORTED RECONSTRUCTIONS; PROSTHESIS; RETENTION; SURVIVAL; METAANALYSIS; ASSOCIATION; DISEASES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0191717
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to identify the peri-implant conditions (bleeding on probing (BOP), pocket probing depth (PPD), modified plaque index (mPI)) and marginal bone loss (MBL, marginal bone level change between follow-up and occlusal loading) around cemented and screw-retained posterior single crowns on tissue-level implants. The study was a retrospective cohort study with up to 4 years (mean 2.5 years) follow-up. Patients with either cemented or screw-retained crowns in posterior regions were included. Implant survival, technical complications, BOP, PPD, mPI, MBL, biologic complications (peri-implant mocositis and peri-implantitis) were evaluated. Mann-Whitney U test was used to test the difference between the screw-retained group (SG) and cemented group (CG). 176 patients (SG: 94, CG: 82) were included. The implant survival rates were 100% in SG and 98.8% in CG. Prosthetic screw loosening was found in 8 restorations (8.7%) at follow-up visit. Peri-implant mucositis rate was significantly higher in the SG group (42.1%) than that in the CG group (32.2%) (P = 0.04). Six patients (6.38%) in the screw-retained group and 5 patients (6.10%) in the cemented group were diagnosed with peri-implantitis, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P>0.05). No significant difference of PPD, mPI and MBL were found between two groups (P = 0.11, 0.13 and 0.08, respectively). High implant survival rates were achieved in both groups. Cemented single crowns on tissue-level implants showed comparable peri-implant conditions in comparison with two-piece screw-retained crowns. Well-designed prospective cohort or randomized controlled clinical trials with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the result.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term survival and success of zirconia screw-retained implant-supported prostheses for up to 12 years: A retrospective multicenter study
    Pozzi, Alessandro
    Arcuri, Lorenzo
    Fabbri, Giacomo
    Singer, Guido
    Londono, Jimmy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 129 (01): : 96 - 108
  • [42] Risk indicators associated with peri-implant diseases: a retrospective cross-sectional study of Colombian patients with 1 to 18 years of follow-up
    Ortiz-Echeverri, Ana Maria
    Gallego-Gonzalez, Carolina
    Castano-Granada, Maria Catalina
    Tobon-Arroyave, Sergio Ivan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 54 (03): : 161 - 176
  • [43] Peri-implant bone defects: A 1-year follow-up comparative study of use of hyaluronic acid and xenografts
    Kaya, O. A.
    Muglali, M.
    Torul, D.
    Kaya, I.
    [J]. NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 22 (10) : 1388 - 1395
  • [44] Assessment of the association between the Implant Disease Risk Assessment (IDRA) tool and peri-implantitis: a retrospective cohort study with up to 8 years of follow-up
    Rebeiz, T.
    Nasr, L.
    Kassir, A. R.
    Menassa, G.
    Chakar, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 53 (10) : 845 - 852
  • [45] Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implant-supported single-unit crowns with cantilever extension in posterior areas: A retrospective study with a follow-up of at least 10 years
    Schmid, Eric
    Roccuzzo, Andrea
    Morandini, Michele
    Ramseier, Christoph A.
    Sculean, Anton
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (02) : 189 - 196
  • [46] A Retrospective Analysis of Mandibular Bone Height Changes Associated with 81 Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses with Distal Cantilevers: A Long-Term Follow-up Analysis
    Dhima, Matilda
    Balshi, Thomas
    Wolfinger, Glenn
    Petropoulos, Vicki C.
    Balshi, Stephen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (03) : 854 - 859
  • [47] Assessment of Marginal Peri-implant Bone-Level Short-Length Implants Compared with Standard Implants Supporting Single Crowns in a Controlled Clinical Trial: 12-Month Follow-up
    Mendoza-Azpur, Gerardo
    Lau, Miguel
    Valdivia, Erick
    Rojas, Jorge
    Munoz, Henry
    Nevins, Myron
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 36 (06) : 791 - 795
  • [48] Clinical Performance of One-Piece, Screw-Retained Implant Crowns Based on Hand-Veneered CAD/CAM Zirconia Abutments After a Mean Follow-up Period of 2.3 Years
    Schnider, Nicole
    Forrer, Fiona Alena
    Braegger, Urs
    Hicklin, Stefan Paul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (01) : 188 - 196
  • [49] Influence of the keratinized mucosa on the stability of peri-implant tissues and brushing discomfort: A 4-year follow-up study
    Perussolo, Jeniffer
    Souza, Andre B.
    Matarazzo, Flavia
    Oliveira, Ricardo P.
    Araujo, Mauricio G.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (12) : 1177 - 1185
  • [50] Marginal bone loss and the risk indicators of fixed screw-retained implant-supported prostheses and fixed telescopic-retained implant-supported prostheses in full arch: A retrospective case-control study
    Oda, Yukari
    Mori, Gentaro
    Honma, Shinya
    Ito, Taichi
    Iijima, Toshikazu
    Yajima, Yasutomo
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (07) : 818 - 827