Peri-implant conditions and marginal bone loss around cemented and screw-retained single implant crowns in posterior regions: A retrospective cohort study with up to 4 years follow-up

被引:17
|
作者
Shi, Jun-Yu [1 ]
Jie-Ni [1 ]
Zhuang, Long-fei [2 ]
Zhang, Xiao-Meng [1 ]
Fan, Lin-Feng [3 ]
Lai, Hong-Chang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Dept Dent Implantat,Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Adore Dent Care, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Dept Radiol,Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
COMPLICATION RATES; SUPPORTED RECONSTRUCTIONS; PROSTHESIS; RETENTION; SURVIVAL; METAANALYSIS; ASSOCIATION; DISEASES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0191717
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to identify the peri-implant conditions (bleeding on probing (BOP), pocket probing depth (PPD), modified plaque index (mPI)) and marginal bone loss (MBL, marginal bone level change between follow-up and occlusal loading) around cemented and screw-retained posterior single crowns on tissue-level implants. The study was a retrospective cohort study with up to 4 years (mean 2.5 years) follow-up. Patients with either cemented or screw-retained crowns in posterior regions were included. Implant survival, technical complications, BOP, PPD, mPI, MBL, biologic complications (peri-implant mocositis and peri-implantitis) were evaluated. Mann-Whitney U test was used to test the difference between the screw-retained group (SG) and cemented group (CG). 176 patients (SG: 94, CG: 82) were included. The implant survival rates were 100% in SG and 98.8% in CG. Prosthetic screw loosening was found in 8 restorations (8.7%) at follow-up visit. Peri-implant mucositis rate was significantly higher in the SG group (42.1%) than that in the CG group (32.2%) (P = 0.04). Six patients (6.38%) in the screw-retained group and 5 patients (6.10%) in the cemented group were diagnosed with peri-implantitis, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P>0.05). No significant difference of PPD, mPI and MBL were found between two groups (P = 0.11, 0.13 and 0.08, respectively). High implant survival rates were achieved in both groups. Cemented single crowns on tissue-level implants showed comparable peri-implant conditions in comparison with two-piece screw-retained crowns. Well-designed prospective cohort or randomized controlled clinical trials with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the result.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aesthetic Outcomes and Peri-Implant Health of Angled Screw Retained Implant Restorations Compared with Cement Retained Crowns: Medium Term Follow-Up
    Nastri, Livia
    Nucci, Ludovica
    Grassia, Vincenzo
    Miraldi, Rino
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2021, 12 (02)
  • [2] Clinical Peri-Implant Parameters and Marginal Bone Loss for Early Mandibular Implant Overdentures: A Follow-Up of 60 Months
    Alhelal, Abdulaziz A.
    Alzaid, Abdulaziz A.
    Almujel, Saad H.
    Alsaloum, Mohammed
    Alanazi, Khalid K.
    Althubaitiy, Ramzi O.
    Al-Aali, Khulud A.
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (04):
  • [3] CAD/CAM Implant Abutments: Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Response with Up to 4 Years of Follow-up-A Retrospective Cohort Study Evaluation
    Parpaiola, Andrea
    Toia, Marco
    Norton, Michael
    Cecchinato, Denis
    Bressan, Eriberto
    Lops, Diego
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 40 (02) : 193 - 201
  • [4] Variables Affecting Peri-Implant Radiographic Bone Loss-8-23 Years Follow-Up
    Saminsky, Michael
    Ben Dor, Anat
    Horwitz, Jacob
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (23): : 1 - 11
  • [5] Cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: Up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design
    Preiskel, HW
    Tsolka, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2004, 19 (01) : 87 - 91
  • [6] Peri-implant marginal bone loss and systemic statin use: A retrospective cohort pilot study
    Bahrami-Hessari, Behzad
    Jansson, Leif
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 8 (01): : 20 - 27
  • [7] Optimizing the esthetic outcome by using screw-retained implant abutment crowns: A 3-year clinical follow-up
    Cicero, Emanuele
    El Rafie, Khaled
    De Souza, Andre
    Kawabe, Yasuhiko
    Kang, Kiho
    Att, Wael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (05): : 608 - 615
  • [8] Peri-implant and esthetic outcomes of cemented and screw-retained crowns using zirconia abutments in single implant-supported restorations-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dini, Caroline
    Borges, Guilherme Almeida
    Costa, Raphael Cavalcante
    Magno, Marcela Barauna
    Maia, Lucianne Cople
    Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (10) : 1143 - 1158
  • [9] Short communication: Cemented implant reconstructions are associated with less marginal bone loss than screw-retained reconstructions at 3 and 5 years of loading
    Strauss, Franz-Josef
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (05) : 651 - 656
  • [10] Impact of crown-to-implant ratio of marginal bone loss around implant-supported single crowns. A 5 years retrospective study
    Stoichkov, B.
    Kirov, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2020, 12 (04) : 706 - 710