Validation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by PCR analysis: genotype comparison of the blastomere and corresponding embryo, implications for clinical practice

被引:15
|
作者
Dreesen, J. [1 ,4 ]
Drusedau, M. [1 ]
Smeets, H. [1 ,4 ]
de Die-Smulders, C. [1 ,4 ]
Coonen, E. [1 ,2 ]
Dumoulin, J. [2 ]
Gielen, M. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Evers, J. [2 ,4 ]
Herbergs, J. [1 ,4 ]
Geraedts, J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Genet & Cell Biol, Div Complex Genet, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, GROW, Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, NUTRIM, Sch Nutr Toxicol & Metab, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Birmingham, Unit Genet Epidemiol, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
preimplantation genetic diagnosis; preimplantation diagnosis; sensitivity; negative predictive value; embryo morphology;
D O I
10.1093/molehr/gan052
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to validate the overall preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)-PCR procedure and to determine the diagnostic value. Genotyped embryos not selected for embryo transfer ( ET) and unsuitable for cryopreservation after PGD were used for confirmatory analysis. The PGD genotyped blastomeres and corresponding embryos were compared, and morphology was scored on Day 4 post fertilization. To establish the validity of the PGD-PCR procedure and the diagnostic value, misdiagnosis rate, false-negative rate and negative predictive value were calculated. Moreover, comparison on the validity was made for the biopsy of one or two blastomeres. For the total embryo group (n = 422), a misdiagnosis rate of 7.1% and a false-negative rate of 3.1% were found. The negative predictive value was 96.1%. Poor morphology Day 4 embryos ( Class 1) were over-represented in the embryo group in which the blastomere genotype was not confirmed by the whole embryo genotype. The misdiagnosis rate of Class 1 embryos was 12.5% and the false-negative rate 17.1%. Exclusion of these embryos resulted in a misdiagnosis rate of 6.1%, a false-negative rate of 0.5% and a negative predictive value of 99.3%. The two blastomere biopsies revealed a significant higher positive predictive value, lowering the misdiagnosis rate, whereas the negative predictive value remained the same. In conclusion, the PGD-PCR procedure is a valid diagnostic method to select unaffected embryos for ET. The misdiagnosis and false-negative rates decrease by rejecting Class 1 embryos for ET. The biopsy of a second blastomere improves the positive predictive value, lowering the misdiagnosis rate.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 579
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of RT-PCR as a clinical tool for diagnosis in PGD. A model study on the expression of the tuberous sclerosis genes throughout human preimplantation embryo development
    Tachataki, M.
    Winston, R. M. L.
    Taylor, D. M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 : 12 - 12
  • [42] Efficacy of whole genome amplification (WGA) and nested PCR methods for single cell analysis in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for monogenic diseases
    Kim, M. J.
    Park, S. O.
    Kim, M.
    Hong, Y. S.
    Kim, Y. S.
    Joe, E. B.
    Cho, Y. J.
    Park, E. A.
    Lee, J. H.
    Kim, R.
    Lee, Y.
    Yoon, T. K.
    Kang, I. S.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 : 393 - 393
  • [43] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency by simultaneous analysis of duplex-nested PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization : A case report
    Lee, Hyoung-Song
    Jun, Jin Hyun
    Choi, Hye Won
    Lim, Chun Kyu
    Yoo, Han-Wook
    Koong, Mi Kyoung
    Kang, Inn Soo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 22 (03) : 572 - 576
  • [44] The role of prenatal diagnosis following preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene conditions: A historical overview of evolving technologies and clinical practice
    Hardy, Tristan
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2020, 40 (06) : 647 - 651
  • [45] Comparison of embryo development between non-biopsy cycles and laser assisted biopsy cycles for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) within the same patient population
    Carter, J
    Richter, KS
    Kearns, WG
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 : S242 - S242
  • [46] ESHRE PGD Consortium/Embryology Special Interest Group-best practice guidelines for polar body and embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS)
    Harton, G. L.
    Magli, M. C.
    Lundin, K.
    Montag, M.
    Lemmen, J.
    Harper, J. C.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [47] Comparison of whole genome amplification and nested-PCR methods for preimplantation genetic diagnosis for BRCA1 gene mutation on unfertilized oocytes–a pilot study
    Danuta Michalska
    Kinga Jaguszewska
    Joanna Liss
    Kamila Kitowska
    Agata Mirecka
    Krzysztof Łukaszuk
    [J]. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, 11
  • [48] Mixed-treatments comparison meta-analysis of antidepressants: implications for everyday clinical practice
    Barbui, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 14 : 14 - 14
  • [49] In Vitro Validation and Comparison of Different Software Packages or Algorithms for Coronary Bifurcation Analysis Using Calibrated Phantoms: Implications for Clinical Practice and Research of Bifurcation Stenting
    Ishibashi, Yuki
    Grundeken, Maik J.
    Nakatani, Shimpei
    Iqbal, Javaid
    Morel, Marie-Angele
    Genereux, Philippe
    Girasis, Chrysafios
    Wentzel, Jolanda J.
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    Onuma, Yoshinobu
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 85 (04) : 554 - 563
  • [50] Introducing direct CGG repeat analysis in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for fragile X syndrome: an overview of clinical outcomes for 116 patients
    Cabey, R.
    Nusblat, D.
    Gay, J.
    Armenti, E.
    Chu, B.
    Goodall, N.
    Prates, R.
    Konstantinidis, M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 : 422 - 422