Validation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by PCR analysis: genotype comparison of the blastomere and corresponding embryo, implications for clinical practice

被引:15
|
作者
Dreesen, J. [1 ,4 ]
Drusedau, M. [1 ]
Smeets, H. [1 ,4 ]
de Die-Smulders, C. [1 ,4 ]
Coonen, E. [1 ,2 ]
Dumoulin, J. [2 ]
Gielen, M. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Evers, J. [2 ,4 ]
Herbergs, J. [1 ,4 ]
Geraedts, J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Genet & Cell Biol, Div Complex Genet, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, GROW, Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, NUTRIM, Sch Nutr Toxicol & Metab, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Birmingham, Unit Genet Epidemiol, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
preimplantation genetic diagnosis; preimplantation diagnosis; sensitivity; negative predictive value; embryo morphology;
D O I
10.1093/molehr/gan052
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to validate the overall preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)-PCR procedure and to determine the diagnostic value. Genotyped embryos not selected for embryo transfer ( ET) and unsuitable for cryopreservation after PGD were used for confirmatory analysis. The PGD genotyped blastomeres and corresponding embryos were compared, and morphology was scored on Day 4 post fertilization. To establish the validity of the PGD-PCR procedure and the diagnostic value, misdiagnosis rate, false-negative rate and negative predictive value were calculated. Moreover, comparison on the validity was made for the biopsy of one or two blastomeres. For the total embryo group (n = 422), a misdiagnosis rate of 7.1% and a false-negative rate of 3.1% were found. The negative predictive value was 96.1%. Poor morphology Day 4 embryos ( Class 1) were over-represented in the embryo group in which the blastomere genotype was not confirmed by the whole embryo genotype. The misdiagnosis rate of Class 1 embryos was 12.5% and the false-negative rate 17.1%. Exclusion of these embryos resulted in a misdiagnosis rate of 6.1%, a false-negative rate of 0.5% and a negative predictive value of 99.3%. The two blastomere biopsies revealed a significant higher positive predictive value, lowering the misdiagnosis rate, whereas the negative predictive value remained the same. In conclusion, the PGD-PCR procedure is a valid diagnostic method to select unaffected embryos for ET. The misdiagnosis and false-negative rates decrease by rejecting Class 1 embryos for ET. The biopsy of a second blastomere improves the positive predictive value, lowering the misdiagnosis rate.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 579
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and embryo research - human developmental biology in clinical practice
    Braude, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 45 (03): : 607 - 611
  • [2] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in clinical practice
    Kanavakis, E
    Traeger-Synodinos, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2002, 39 (01) : 6 - 11
  • [3] Modification of late embryo development after blastomere removal on day 3 for preimplantation genetic diagnosis
    Freour, T.
    Lammers, J.
    Reignier, A.
    Splingart, C.
    Barriere, P.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 221 - 221
  • [4] Validation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for clinical applications
    Tyson, H
    Chong, S
    Benner, A
    Al Hasnan, Z
    Katsanis, S
    Thrift, K
    Lawler, A
    Stetten, G
    Zhao, Y
    Cutting, GR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 73 (05) : 598 - 598
  • [5] The blastocyst embryo cryopreservation after blastomere biopsy on day 3 for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).
    Wu, B
    Lu, S
    Gelety, TJ
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S180 - S180
  • [6] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for mitochondrial DNA mutations: analysis of one blastomere suffices
    Sallevelt, Suzanne C. E. H.
    Dreesen, Joseph C. F. M.
    Coonen, Edith
    Paulussen, Aimee D. C.
    Hellebrekers, Debby M. E. I.
    de Die-Smulders, Christine E. M.
    Smeets, Hubert J. M.
    Lindsey, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2017, 54 (10) : 693 - 697
  • [7] Assessment of the reliability of single blastomere analysis for preimplantation diagnosis of the ΔF508 deletion causing cystic fibrosis in clinical practice
    Ray, PF
    Ao, A
    Taylor, DM
    Winston, RML
    Handyside, AH
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1998, 18 (13) : 1402 - 1412
  • [8] Clinical application of day 4 embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic screening and diagnosis (PGS and PGD). A retrospective analysis of our current practice
    Liperis, G.
    Crittenden, J.
    Thymi, M.
    Hellani, A.
    Sjoblom, C.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 230 - 230
  • [9] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: does embryo biopsy for PGD compromise clinical outcome?
    Ouhibi, N
    Patton, PE
    Burry, KA
    Olson, S
    Lawce, H
    Gorrill, MJ
    Lee, DM
    Battaglia, DE
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 : S23 - S23
  • [10] ESHRE PGD Consortium 'best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)'
    Thornhill, AR
    deDie-Smulders, CE
    Geraedts, JP
    Harper, JC
    Harton, GL
    Lavery, SA
    Moutou, C
    Robinson, MD
    Schmutzler, AG
    Scriven, PN
    Sermon, KD
    Wilton, L
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (01) : 35 - 48