Comment on the transmission matrix for a dielectric interface

被引:11
|
作者
Zhai, Peng-Wang [1 ]
Kattawar, George W. [2 ]
Hu, Yongxiang
机构
[1] NASA, SSAI, MS 475, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Atmosphere and ocean optics; Propagation; transmission; attenuation; and radiative transfer; Scattering; polarization; VECTOR RADIATIVE-TRANSFER; MONTE-CARLO; ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN; POLARIZATION; SCATTERING; SYSTEMS; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.07.001
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
In a recent paper the reflection and transmission matrices for a dielectric interface based on Fresnel formulas are derived [Garcia RDM. Fresnel boundary and interface conditions for polarized radiative transfer in a multilayer medium. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2012;113:306-17]. Although the final formulas appear to be correct, we found that there are some significant conceptual and logical flaws in the derivation. Here we explain that the misunderstanding is due to the different physical significances of the Stokes parameters for the coherent and diffuse radiation field and that the so-called transmission factor directly originates from the physical definition of the Stokes parameters. We also clarify a few incorrect interpretations in the aforementioned paper about previously published works. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1981 / 1984
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条