Validation of a Difficulty Grading Score in Laparoscopic Splenectomy

被引:3
|
作者
Goncalves, Diana [1 ,2 ]
Morais, Marina [1 ,2 ]
Costa-Pinho, Andre [1 ,2 ]
Bessa-Melo, Renato [1 ,2 ]
Graca, Luis [1 ]
Costa-Maia, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sao Joao Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Alameda Prof Hernani Monteiro, P-4200319 Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Porto, Portugal
关键词
laparoscopic splenectomy; conversion; difficulty grading score; BENIGN; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2017.0478
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is the gold standard for the treatment of many spleen-related disorders. However, in the presence of splenomegaly, the rate of conversion to open surgery can be as high as 33.9% and is associated with longer operative times and higher costs. In an attempt to improve risk stratification and patient selection for LS, a score that includes four preoperative parameters (age, gender, diagnosis, and spleen size) has been developed. The aim was the validation of a difficulty grading score, in predicting conversion and poorer outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 153 consecutive patients subjected to LS from January 2006 through December 2016 was performed. Several parameters were reviewed and correlation with evaluated outcomes was analyzed. Results: Conversion to open surgery occurred in 13 (8.50%) patients and was highly associated with serious intraoperative complications. Spearman correlation showed a significant association between the score and risk of conversion, operative time, and postoperative complications, but not with intraoperative bleeding. Discussion: Patient and disease features, incorporated in a difficulty grading score, can reliably determine the difficulty of LS and predict risk of conversion, intraoperative, and postoperative complications. This simple and reproducible score improves risk stratification for LS and could be practical in daily clinical activities.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 247
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort
    Barron, John O.
    Orabi, Danny
    Moro, Amika
    Quintini, Cristiano
    Berber, Eren
    Aucejo, Federico N.
    Sasaki, Kazunari
    Kwon, Choon-Hyuck D.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (05): : 3601 - 3609
  • [22] Operative difficulty grading scale for laparoscopic appendicectomy: A novel tool
    Smigielski, Michelle
    Mackenzie, Scott
    Dent, Owen
    Giles, Anna
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [23] A novel difficulty grading system for laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy
    Kosei Takagi
    Hendrikus J. A. N. Kimenai
    Turkan Terkivatan
    Khe T. C. Tran
    Jan N. M. Ijzermans
    Robert C. Minnee
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 2889 - 2895
  • [24] A novel difficulty grading system for laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy
    Takagi, Kosei
    Kimenai, Hendrikus J. A. N.
    Terkivatan, Turkan
    Tran, Khe T. C.
    Ijzermans, Jan N. M.
    Minnee, Robert C.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (06): : 2889 - 2895
  • [25] External validation of the Japanese difficulty score for laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients undergoing robotic-assisted hepatectomy
    Ansley Beth Ricker
    Joshua M. Davis
    Benjamin M. Motz
    Michael Watson
    Michael Beckman
    Michael Driedger
    John B. Martinie
    Dionisios Vrochides
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 7288 - 7294
  • [26] External validation of the Japanese difficulty score for laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients undergoing robotic-assisted hepatectomy
    Ricker, Ansley Beth
    Davis, Joshua M. M.
    Motz, Benjamin M. M.
    Watson, Michael
    Beckman, Michael
    Driedger, Michael
    Martinie, John B. B.
    Vrochides, Dionisios
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (09): : 7288 - 7294
  • [27] Validation of preoperative predictor score for difficult laparascopic cholecystectomy and a modified intraoperative grading score of the difficulty of laparascopic cholecystectomy: from a resource limited setting
    Ahmed, Nurhussen Mossa
    Djote, Surafel Mulatu
    Alemayehu, Getachew Desta
    Amtataw, Wondwossen
    Ahmed, Sitotaw Mossa
    BMC SURGERY, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [28] A risk score to predict the difficulty of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Soltes, Marek
    Radonak, Jozef
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2014, 9 (04) : 608 - 612
  • [29] Single-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Difficulty Score
    Wiwanitkit, Somsri
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (03): : 329 - 329
  • [30] Application of a novel surgical difficulty grading system during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Asai, Koji
    Iwashita, Yukio
    Ohyama, Tetsuji
    Endo, Itaru
    Hibi, Taizo
    Umezawa, Akiko
    Suzuki, Kenji
    Watanabe, Manabu
    Kurata, Masanao
    Mori, Yasuhisa
    Higashida, Masaharu
    Kumamoto, Yusuke
    Shindoh, Junichi
    Yoshida, Masahiro
    Honda, Goro
    Misawa, Takeyuki
    Abe, Yuta
    Nagakawa, Yuichi
    Toyota, Naoyuki
    Yamada, Shigetoshi
    Norimizu, Shinji
    Matsumura, Naoki
    Sata, Naohiro
    Sunagawa, Hiroki
    Ito, Masahiro
    Takeda, Yutaka
    Nakamura, Yoshiharu
    Rikiyama, Toshiki
    Higuchi, Ryota
    Gocho, Takeshi
    Honma, Yuki
    Hirashita, Teijiro
    Kanemoto, Hideyuki
    Nozawa, Masayuki
    Watanabe, Yusuke
    Kohga, Atsushi
    Yazawa, Takehisa
    Tajima, Hiroshi
    Nakahira, Shin
    Asaoka, Tadafumi
    Yoshioka, Ryuji
    Fukuzawa, Junya
    Fujioka, Shuichi
    Hata, Daigo
    Haruta, Hidenori
    Asano, Yukio
    Nomura, Ryohei
    Matsumoto, Joe
    Kameyama, Noriaki
    Miyoshi, Atsushi
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (07) : 758 - 767