Qualitative hesitant fuzzy group decision making: An additively consistent probability and consensus-based perspective

被引:6
|
作者
Tang, Jie [1 ]
Meng, Fanyong [1 ,4 ]
Xu, Zeshui [2 ]
Yuan, Ruiping [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Wuzi Univ, Sch Informat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
additive consistency; consensus; group decision making; HFLPR; 0-1-MPMs; LINGUISTIC PREFERENCE RELATIONS; MULTIPLICATIVE CONSISTENCY; PRIORITY WEIGHTS; SUPPORT MODEL; TERM SETS; AGGREGATION; OPERATORS;
D O I
10.1111/exsy.12510
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (HFLPRs) can efficiently denote the hesitant qualitative judgments of decision makers. Consistency and consensus are two critical topics in group decision making (GDM) with preference relations. This paper uses the additively consistent concept for linguistic fuzzy preference relations (LFPRs) to give an additive consistency definition for HFLPRs. To judge the additive consistency of HFLPRs, 0-1 mixed programming models (0-1-MPMs) are constructed. Meanwhile, additive-consistency-based 0-1-MPMs to ascertain missing values in incomplete HFLPRs are established. Following the consistent probability of LFPRs, an algorithm to calculate the linguistic priority weighting vector is presented. In consideration of the consensus of GDM, a consistency-probability-distance-measure-based consensus index is defined, and an interactive improving consensus method is provided. Finally, a method for GDM with HFLPRs is offered that can address incomplete and inconsistent cases. Meanwhile, numerical examples are offered, and comparative analysis is made.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Group Decision Making With Probabilistic Hesitant Multiplicative Preference Relations Based on Consistency and Consensus
    Lin, Mingwei
    Zhan, Qianshan
    Xu, Zeshui
    Chen, Riqing
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 63329 - 63344
  • [42] A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters
    Wu, Zhibin
    Xu, Jiuping
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2018, 41 : 217 - 231
  • [43] Consistency and consensus checking and improving methods for group decision-making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations
    Li, Jian
    Niu, Li-li
    Chen, Qiongxia
    Li, Mei
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2025, 76 (01) : 137 - 154
  • [44] Consensus reaching with consistency control in group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations
    Li, Zhuolin
    Zhang, Zhen
    Yu, Wenyu
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 170
  • [45] On Consensus Measures in Fuzzy Group Decision Making
    Cabrerizo, F. J.
    Alonso, S.
    Perez, I. J.
    Herrera-Viedma, E.
    MODELING DECISIONS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5285 : 86 - +
  • [46] Incomplete Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations in Group Decision Making
    Khalid, Asma
    Beg, Ismat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 19 (03) : 637 - 645
  • [47] Hesitant Fuzzy Group Decision Making Under Incomplete Information
    Lv, Jin-hui
    Guo, Si-zong
    FUZZY INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING AND DECISION, 2018, 646 : 91 - 101
  • [48] Group Decision Making with Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations
    Na Zhao
    Zeshui Xu
    Fengjun Liu
    Cognitive Computation, 2016, 8 : 1119 - 1143
  • [49] Computational approach for hesitant fuzzy group decision making problems
    Joshi, Dheeraj Kumar
    Kumar, Sanjay
    2017 4TH IEEE UTTAR PRADESH SECTION INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, COMPUTER AND ELECTRONICS (UPCON), 2017, : 54 - 61
  • [50] Group decision making approach of weighted hesitant fuzzy sets
    Zeng W.-Y.
    Li D.-Q.
    Yin Q.
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2019, 34 (03): : 527 - 534