Role of Frontal Sinus Surgery in Nasal Polyp Recurrence

被引:98
|
作者
Bassiouni, Ahmed [1 ]
Wormald, Peter-John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Dept Surg Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2013年 / 123卷 / 01期
关键词
Chronic rhinosinusitis; nasal polyposis; nasal polyp recurrence; endoscopic sinus surgery; revision sinus surgery; radical sinus surgery; frontal sinus surgery; frontal sinusotomy; Draf; 3; procedure; modified Lothrop procedure; frontal drillout procedure; REVISION; RHINOSINUSITIS; RATES;
D O I
10.1002/lary.23610
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/Hypothesis: Patients with aggressive nasal polyp recurrence form an important subgroup of patients with refractory sinus disease. The objectives of this study were to establish patterns of polyp recurrence and evaluate the effect of frontal sinus surgery (Draf 2a vs. Draf 3) on polyp recurrence. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study reviewing 338 consecutive operations. Methods: Polyp recurrence was defined according to the Lund-Kennedy mucosal edema score. Survival analysis methods were used for statistics. Results: After complete sphenoethmoidectomies, Draf 2a frontal sinusotomies, and middle meatal antrostomies persistent polyp recurrence occurred in 19.8% of patients after 6 months and increased to 22.7% of patients after 12 months. Polyps first recurred in the area of the frontal sinus/ostium (55%) followed by the ethmoids (38%). Asthma and aspirin sensitivity were the most important variables affecting recurrence (hazard ratios, 1.71, 1.79, respectively; P < .05) The Draf 3 procedure was a significant factor in reducing recurrence, especially in asthma and aspirin intolerant patients. The overall revision rate was 18% (follow-up duration >12 months, median = 29 months), with a 37% revision rate in the FESS group versus 7% in the Draf 3 group (P < .001). Survival analysis showed that the Draf 3 significantly reduced the risk of revision (hazard ratio = 0.258, P = .0026). Conclusions: Nasal polyposis is characterized by a high rate of recurrence. The presence of asthma or aspirin intolerance leads to more aggressive recurrence, and in these patients the Draf 3 drillout procedure becomes a good option for improved long-term outcomes and reducing the need for revision surgery. Laryngoscope, 2013
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 41
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endonasal frontal sinus surgery
    Weber, R.
    HNO, 2009, 57 (08) : 751 - 762
  • [32] Instrumentation in Frontal Sinus Surgery
    Tajudeen, Bobby A.
    Adappa, Nithin D.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 49 (04) : 945 - +
  • [33] SURGERY OF FRONTAL SINUS INFECTION
    DUPREEZ, SFM
    COLLARD, WM
    SELLARS, SL
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1975, 49 (46): : 1911 - 1914
  • [34] Surgery of frontal sinus osteoma
    Fobe, LPD
    de Melo, EC
    Cannone, LF
    Fobe, JL
    ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2002, 60 (01) : 101 - 105
  • [35] SURGERY OF FRONTAL SINUS INFECTION
    THOMSON, JG
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1976, 50 (06): : 159 - 159
  • [36] Frontal sinus surgery in children
    Talbot, AR
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 29 (01) : 143 - +
  • [37] History of frontal sinus surgery
    Ramadan, HH
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2000, 126 (01) : 98 - 99
  • [38] RATIONALE OF FRONTAL SINUS SURGERY
    GOODALE, RL
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1965, 75 (06): : 981 - &
  • [39] OSTEOPLASTIC SURGERY OF FRONTAL SINUS
    ALFORD, BR
    GORMAN, GN
    MERSOL, VF
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1965, 75 (07): : 1139 - &
  • [40] Osteolytic nasal polyp of the maxillary sinus mimicking malignancy
    Karikal, Arvind
    Sharma, Sampathila Mahalinga
    Gopinath, Anju
    Karikal, Arathi
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2014, 5 (03) : 397 - 401