Performance Characteristics of the Ultrasound Strategy during Incidence Screening in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)

被引:5
|
作者
Kalsi, Jatinderpal [1 ]
Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra [2 ]
Ryan, Andy [2 ]
Singh, Naveena [3 ]
Burnell, Matthew [2 ]
Massingham, Susan [2 ]
Apostolidou, Sophia [2 ]
Sharma, Aarti [4 ]
Williamson, Karin [5 ]
Seif, Mourad [6 ,7 ]
Mould, Tim [8 ]
Woolas, Robert [9 ]
Dobbs, Stephen [10 ]
Leeson, Simon [11 ]
Fallowfield, Lesley [12 ]
Skates, Steven J. [13 ]
Parmar, Mahesh [2 ]
Campbell, Stuart [14 ]
Jacobs, Ian [1 ,15 ]
McGuire, Alistair [16 ]
Menon, Usha [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Womens Hlth, Dept Womens Canc, London WC1E 6HU, England
[2] MRC Clin Trials Unit UCL, Inst Clin Trials & Methodol, London WC1V 6LJ, England
[3] Barts & London, Dept Pathol, London E1 2ES, England
[4] Univ Hosp Wales, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales
[5] Nottingham City Hosp, Dept Gynaecol Oncol, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[6] St Marys Hosp, Div Gynaecol & Canc Serv, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[7] Univ Manchester, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[8] Univ Coll Hosp, Dept Gynaecol Oncol, London NW1 2BU, England
[9] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Dept Gynaecol Oncol, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, Hants, England
[10] Belfast City Hosp, Dept Gynaecol Oncol, Belfast BT9 7AB, Antrim, North Ireland
[11] Ysbyty Gwynedd, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Bangor LL57 2PW, Gwynedd, Wales
[12] Univ Sussex, Canc Res UK Sussex Psychosocial Oncol Grp, Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Falmer BN1 9PX, England
[13] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[14] Create Fertil Clin, London EC2V 6ET, England
[15] Univ New South Wales, Dept Womens Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[16] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London WC2A 2AE, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
ovarian cancer; screening; ultrasound; TVS; early detection; trial; randomised controlled trial; UKCTOCS;
D O I
10.3390/cancers13040858
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary The United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening was undertaken to assess whether screening postmenopausal women from the general population might result in detection of ovarian/tubal cancers at an earlier stage and thus save lives. One of the screening strategies tested was a yearly transvaginal ultrasound scan of the ovaries (USS). Following the initial screen, 44,799 of the 50,639 women in the USS group went on to have a further 280,534 annual scans during April 2002-December 2011. Abnormalities leading to surgery were detected in 960 women of whom 113 (80 invasive epithelial) had ovarian/tubal cancer. Ovarian/tubal cancer was missed in 52 (50 invasive epithelial) women. Of the screen-detected cancers, 37.5% and missed cancers 6% were early stage(I/II). The number (detection rate 61.5%; 80/130) and advanced stage of the missed invasive cancers suggests that a yearly ultrasound scan may not be suitable for screening average risk women for ovarian cancer. Randomised controlled trials of ovarian cancer (OC) screening have not yet demonstrated an impact on disease mortality. Meanwhile, the screening data from clinical trials represents a rich resource to understand the performance of modalities used. We report here on incidence screening in the ultrasound arm of UKCTOCS. 44,799 of the 50,639 women who were randomised to annual screening with transvaginal ultrasound attended annual incidence screening between 28 April 2002 and 31 December 2011. Transvaginal ultrasound was used both as the first and the second line test. Participants were followed up through electronic health record linkage and postal questionnaires. Out of 280,534 annual incidence screens, 960 women underwent screen-positive surgery. 113 had ovarian/tubal cancer (80 invasive epithelial). Of the screen-detected invasive epithelial cancers, 37.5% (95% CI: 26.9-49.0) were Stage I/II. An additional 52 (50 invasive epithelial) were diagnosed within one year of their last screen. Of the 50 interval epithelial cancers, 6.0% (95% CI: 1.3-16.5) were Stage I/II. For detection of all ovarian/tubal cancers diagnosed within one year of screen, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were 68.5% (95% CI: 60.8-75.5), 99.7% (95% CI: 99.7-99.7), and 11.8% (95% CI: 9.8-14) respectively. When the analysis was restricted to invasive epithelial cancers, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values were 61.5% (95% CI: 52.6-69.9); 99.7% (95% CI: 99.7-99.7) and 8.3% (95% CI: 6.7-10.3), with 12 surgeries per screen positive. The low sensitivity coupled with the advanced stage of interval cancers suggests that ultrasound scanning as the first line test might not be suitable for population screening for ovarian cancer. Trial registration: ISRCTN22488978. Registered on 6 April 2000.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ultrasound screening of ovarian cancer
    Baeumler, Marcel
    Gallant, Delphine
    Druckmann, Rene
    Kuhn, Walther
    HORMONE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2020, 41 (03)
  • [42] Awareness of ovarian cancer risk factors, beliefs and attitudes towards screening: baseline survey of 21 715 women participating in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening
    L Fallowfield
    A Fleissig
    J Barrett
    U Menon
    I Jacobs
    J Kilkerr
    V Farewell
    British Journal of Cancer, 2010, 103 : 454 - 461
  • [43] Awareness of ovarian cancer risk factors, beliefs and attitudes towards screening: baseline survey of 21 715 women participating in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening
    Fallowfield, L.
    Fleissig, A.
    Barrett, J.
    Menon, U.
    Jacobs, I.
    Kilkerr, J.
    Farewell, V.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 103 (04) : 454 - 461
  • [44] Significant endometrial pathology detected during a transvaginal ultrasound screening trial for ovarian cancer
    Woolas, R.
    Talaat, A.
    Anderson, M.
    Brinkmann, D.
    Gardner, F.
    Gentry-Maharaj, A.
    Ryan, A.
    Rosenthal, A.
    Menon, U.
    Jacobs, I.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (01) : S39 - S39
  • [45] Socioeconomic indicators of health inequalities and female mortality: a nested cohort study within the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
    Bailey, Katharine
    Ryan, Andy
    Apostolidou, Sophia
    Fourkala, Evangelia
    Burnell, Matthew
    Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
    Kalsi, Jatinderpal
    Parmar, Max
    Jacobs, Ian
    Pikhart, Hynek
    Menon, Usha
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 15
  • [46] Re: Factors affecting visualization of postmenopausal ovaries: descriptive study from the multicenter United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
    Ludovisi, M.
    Mavrelos, D.
    Jurkovic, D.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 43 (05)
  • [47] Socioeconomic indicators of health inequalities and female mortality: a nested cohort study within the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
    Katharine Bailey
    Andy Ryan
    Sophia Apostolidou
    Evangelia Fourkala
    Matthew Burnell
    Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
    Jatinderpal Kalsi
    Max Parmar
    Ian Jacobs
    Hynek Pikhart
    Usha Menon
    BMC Public Health, 15
  • [48] Obesity and prostate cancer screening, incidence, and mortality in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial
    Hurwitz, Lauren M.
    Dogbe, Nadine
    Barry, Kathryn Hughes
    Koutros, Stella
    Berndt, Sonja, I
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2023, 115 (12): : 1506 - 1514
  • [49] Colorectal cancer ascertainment through cancer registries, hospital episode statistics, and self-reporting compared to confirmation by clinician: A cohort study nested within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
    Thomas, Darren S.
    Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
    Ryan, Andy
    Fourkala, Evangelia-Ourania
    Apostolidou, Sophia
    Burnell, Matthew
    Alderton, Wendy
    Barnes, Julie
    Timms, John F.
    Menon, Usha
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 58 : 167 - 174