Diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation by hemostatic molecular markers

被引:26
|
作者
Wada, H
Gabazza, E
Nakasaki, T
Shimura, M
Hiyoyama, K
Deguchi, K
Nishikawa, M
Sakuragawa, N
Shiku, H
机构
[1] Mie Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med 2, Tsu, Mie, Japan
[2] Mie Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med 3, Tsu, Mie, Japan
[3] Toyama Med & Pharmaceut Univ, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Toyama, Japan
来源
SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS | 2000年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
DIC; pre-DIC; TAT; PPIC; sFM;
D O I
10.1055/s-2000-9797
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In the present study, the positive rate of thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), plasmin-plasmin inhibitor complex (PPIC), soluble fibrin monomer (sFM), and D-dimer for the diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIG) was evaluated. The study comprised 307 patients with DIG, 123 with pre-DIG, and 121 with non-DIG. Plasma levels of TAT, PPIC, sFM, and D-dimer were significantly higher in DIG and pre-DIG patients than in non-DIG patients. In DIG patients, the positive rate of sFM was high and that of D-dimer was low; the positive rate of PPIC was higher in patients with hematopoietic malignancy than in those without this disease. In pre-DIG patients, the positive rate of all markers was low (<0.16), and the positive rate of PPIC was relatively high. In non-DIG patients, the positive rate of all hemostatic markers was low (<0.16), that of sFM being the lowest. Scoring the positive rate of TAT, PPIC, and sFM disclosed the following results: 72% of DIG patients had three or more points, 17.6% of pre-DIG patients had three or more points, and almost all (96.6%) non-DIG patients had two or less points. Scoring the positive rate of TAT, PPIC, and D-dimer disclosed the following results: 52.9% of DIG patients and 27.4% of pre-DIG patients had three or more points and almost all (96.7%) non-DIG patients had 2 or less points. These data suggest that the combination of TAT, PPIC, and sFM is useful for making the diagnosis of DIC.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 21
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation made easy
    Levi, M.
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 65 (10): : 366 - 367
  • [32] Disseminated intravascular coagulation: an update on pathogenesis and diagnosis
    Levi, Marcel
    Sivapalaratnam, Suthesh
    EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY, 2018, 11 (08) : 663 - 672
  • [33] DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION - PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT
    DEYKIN, D
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1973, 9 (07): : 957 - 957
  • [34] LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION
    HICKS, DG
    CONNOR, AM
    LAPOSATA, M
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1987, 18 (09) : 585 - 589
  • [35] Disseminated intravascular coagulation: clinical and biological diagnosis
    Touaoussa, Aziz
    El Youssi, Hind
    El Hassani, Imane
    Hanouf, Daham
    El Bergui, Imane
    Zoulati, Ghizlane
    Amrani Hassani, Moncef
    ANNALES DE BIOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 2015, 73 (06) : 657 - 663
  • [36] DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION - PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS
    BOVILL, EG
    FIBRINOLYSIS, 1993, 7 : 17 - 19
  • [37] THROMBOTEST AND DIAGNOSIS OF DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION (DIC)
    GODAL, HC
    KIERULF, P
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1971, 8 (06): : 446 - &
  • [38] PATHOLOGY DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY OF DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION
    MCKAY, DG
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1968, 61 (11P1): : 1129 - &
  • [39] Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of disseminated intravascular coagulation
    Levi, M.
    Toh, C. H.
    Thachil, J. .
    Watson, H. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2009, 145 (01) : 24 - 33
  • [40] Markers of Inflammation and Infection in Sepsis and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation
    Patel, Priya
    Walborn, Amanda
    Rondina, Matthew
    Fareed, Jawed
    Hoppensteadt, Debra
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2019, 25