A Comparison of direct and indirect measurement of induction motor efficiency

被引:15
|
作者
Agamloh, Emmanuel B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Adv Energy Corp, Raleigh, NC 27606 USA
来源
2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRIC MACHINES & DRIVES CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3 | 2009年
关键词
Efficiency; stray load losses; IEEE Std. 112; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1109/IEMDC.2009.5075180
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Induction machine efficiency is defined as the ratio of output power to input power. The efficiency determined from this ratio is known as the direct efficiency. Alternatively, the efficiency is often determined by first determining the losses and using either the input power or the output power to calculate the efficiency. This method, known in standards as the loss segregation method is an indirect method that is known to yield a more accurate result if the stray load losses are properly determined. However, the indirect method is complicated; it requires skilled operator and is time consuming. On the other hand, the direct method is relatively simple and less time consuming. The question is by how much the efficiency numbers produced by these two methods differ. This paper presents a comparison of the two methods from a collection of test data of about 1000 induction motors, rated 1-250hp, to show the relative accuracy of the direct method. The Bland-Altman procedure for comparing measurement methods is used in the analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 42
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Determination of the Measurement Uncertainty of Direct and Indirect Efficiency Measurement Methods in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines
    Yogal, N.
    Lehrmann, C.
    Henke, M.
    2018 XIII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL MACHINES (ICEM), 2018, : 1149 - 1156
  • [22] Efficiency Optimized Indirect Field Oriented Control of Induction Motor Impacting Iron Loss
    El-Kholy, E. E.
    Alwadie, A.
    Youssef, Hossam
    Abouelfadl, A. A.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING-IREE, 2012, 7 (03): : 4419 - 4427
  • [23] Fast efficiency optimization techniques for the indirect vector-controlled induction motor drives
    Chakraborty, C
    Hori, Y
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2003, 39 (04) : 1070 - 1076
  • [24] Comparative study of indirect field oriented and direct torque control for induction motor drives
    Youb, L.
    Craciunescu, A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPTIMIZATION OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, VOL III: INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION AND CONTROL, 2006, : 53 - 58
  • [25] The use of the genetic algorithm for in-situ efficiency measurement of an induction motor
    Charette, A
    Xu, J
    Ba-Razzouk, A
    Pillay, P
    Rajagopalan, V
    2000 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY WINTER MEETING - VOLS 1-4, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 392 - 397
  • [26] Automated Efficiency Measurement of Three Phase Induction Motor using LabVIEW
    Joseph, R. Allen
    Narasimmalou, T.
    Baskaran, K.
    Abraham, Anuj
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATICS, 2013,
  • [27] COMPARISON OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN ANESTHETIZED DOGS
    SAWYER, DC
    BROWN, M
    STRILER, EL
    DURHAM, RA
    LANGHAM, MA
    RECH, RH
    LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1991, 41 (02): : 134 - 138
  • [28] DIGESTIBILITY IN RAINBOW-TROUT - COMPARISON OF THE DIRECT AND INDIRECT METHODS OF MEASUREMENT
    DELANOUE, J
    CHOUBERT, G
    PROGRESSIVE FISH-CULTURIST, 1986, 48 (03): : 190 - 195
  • [29] The comparison of direct and indirect measurement of change to assess the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation
    Herlyn, K
    Weber, U
    Raspe, H
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1997, 40 (09): : 506 - 506
  • [30] Comparison of Permanent Magnetic Motor and Induction Motor on power efficiency in Electric Submersible Pump
    Sulistyanto, D.
    Oetomo, H. K.
    Pramadika, H.
    Ziad, Z.
    Putra, Y. N. H.
    5TH ANNUAL APPLIED SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (AASEC 2020), 2021, 1098