Conceptualizing pathways to sustainable agricultural intensification

被引:25
|
作者
Helfenstein, Julian [1 ]
Diogo, Vasco [2 ]
Burgi, Matthias [2 ]
Verburg, Peter [2 ,3 ]
Swart, Rebecca [3 ]
Mohr, Franziska [2 ,4 ]
Debonne, Niels [3 ]
Levers, Christian [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Herzog, Felix [1 ]
机构
[1] Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Res Inst WSL, Land Change Sci Res Unit, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, Environm Geog Grp, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Bern, Inst Geog, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ British Columbia, Sch Publ Policy & Global Affairs, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Leipzig, Germany
[7] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil IRES, Vancouver, BC, Canada
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
LAND SYSTEM SCIENCE; NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; DECISION-MAKING; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; DRIVING FORCES; SWISS FARMERS; USE INTENSITY; EARTH SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/bs.aecr.2020.08.005
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
There is widespread consensus among scientists, policy makers, and practitioners that agriculture should become more sustainable, while maintaining the ability to meet future food demand. However, there are still many diverging views on what sustainable intensification means, and how to get there. In this article, we present a conceptual framework to navigate agricultural intensification pathways. The conceptual framework aligns three research themes central to improving the sustainability of agriculture: (1) What are the social, economic, and environmental trade-offs of alternative agricultural intensification options? (2) How do land managers decide on intensification strategies, and how can the adoption of sustainable practices be made more attractive? (3) How do socio-political, technological, and environmental mega-trends and other drivers of change affect sustainable intensification measures and agricultural landscapes? The framework presented here goes beyond earlier frameworks by considering multiple dimensions of intensity and sustainability, drawing from both natural and social science theories. Also, it operates across spatial and temporal scales, and is outcome-focused while explicitly considering the linkages between decision making processes and sustainability outcomes. We argue that given these novelties the conceptual framework can serve as a blueprint to assess pathways towards sustainable agricultural intensification.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
    Morton, Lois Wright
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2020, 75 (05) : 109A - 116A
  • [42] What agricultural practices are most likely to deliver "sustainable intensification" in the UK?
    Dicks, Lynn, V
    Rose, David C.
    Ang, Frederic
    Aston, Stephen
    Birch, A. Nicholas E.
    Boatman, Nigel
    Bowles, Elizabeth L.
    Chadwick, David
    Dinsdale, Alex
    Durham, Sam
    Elliott, John
    Firbank, Les
    Humphreys, Stephen
    Jarvis, Phil
    Jones, Dewi
    Kindred, Daniel
    Knight, Stuart M.
    Lee, Michael R. F.
    Leifert, Carlo
    Lobley, Matt
    Matthews, Kim
    Midmer, Alice
    Moore, Mark
    Morris, Carol
    Mortimer, Simon
    Murray, T. Charles
    Norman, Keith
    Ramsden, Stephen
    Roberts, Dave
    Smith, Laurence G.
    Soffe, Richard
    Stoate, Chris
    Taylor, Bryony
    Tinker, David
    Topliff, Mark
    Wallace, John
    Williams, Prysor
    Wilson, Paul
    Winter, Michael
    Sutherland, William J.
    [J]. FOOD AND ENERGY SECURITY, 2019, 8 (01):
  • [43] GEOSPATIAL APPROACH FOR DELINEATING EXTRAPOLATION DOMAINS FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES
    Muthoni, Francis K.
    Baijukya, Frederick
    Sseguya, Haroon
    Bekunda, Mateete
    Hoeschle-Zeledon, Irmgard
    Ouko, Edward
    Mubea, Kenneth
    [J]. 37TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 42-3 (W2): : 145 - 149
  • [44] Sustainable agricultural intensification: the role of cardamom agroforestry in the East Usambaras, Tanzania
    Bullock, Renee
    Mithoefer, Dagmar
    Vihemaeki, Heini
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 12 (02) : 109 - 129
  • [45] Integrated crop–livestock–forestry systems: prospects for a sustainable agricultural intensification
    Bruno J. R. Alves
    Beata E. Madari
    Robert M. Boddey
    [J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2017, 108 : 1 - 4
  • [46] Charting new sustainable agricultural innovation pathways in Brazil
    Martha Jr, Geraldo Bueno
    Rezende, Jorge Alberto Marques
    [J]. SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2023, 80
  • [47] Managing Water Stress by Potassium Fertilizer in Legumes for Sustainable Agricultural Intensification: A Review
    Kataria, Nisha
    Singh, Narender
    [J]. LEGUME RESEARCH, 2022, 45 (07) : 793 - 803
  • [48] Sustainable agricultural intensification practices and rural food security The case of Northwestern Ghana
    Yahaya, Iddrisu
    Pokharel, Krishna P.
    Alidu, Abdul-Fatahi
    Yamoah, Fred Amofa
    [J]. BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2018, 120 (02): : 468 - 482
  • [49] Agricultural technology as a driver of sustainable intensification: insights from the diffusion and focus of patents
    Li, Yafei
    Herzog, Felix
    Levers, Christian
    Mohr, Franziska
    Verburg, Peter H.
    Burgi, Matthias
    Dossche, Rebekka
    Williams, Tim G.
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 44 (02)
  • [50] Agricultural technology as a driver of sustainable intensification: insights from the diffusion and focus of patents
    Yafei Li
    Felix Herzog
    Christian Levers
    Franziska Mohr
    Peter H. Verburg
    Matthias Bürgi
    Rebekka Dossche
    Tim G. Williams
    [J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2024, 44