Systematic reviews: an important anniversary, new reporting standards, and potential greater impact

被引：2
|
作者：
Noyes, Jane [1 ]
Hayter, Mark [2 ]
机构：
[1] Bangor Univ, Coll Hlth & Behav Sci, Sch Healthcare Sci, Ctr Hlth Related Res, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
[2] Univ Hull, Fac Hlth & Social Care, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
来源：
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING | 2013年 / 69卷 / 05期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1111/jan.12115
中图分类号：
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号：
1011 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：985 / 986
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcome Reporting in Neoadjuvant Surgical Trials: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Proposals for New Standards
    Blencowe, N. S.
    Chana, P.
    Whistance, R. N.
    Stevens, D.
    Wong, N. A. C. S.
    Falk, S. J.
    Blazeby, J. M.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (09):
  • [22] Towards greater understanding of implementation during systematic reviews of complex healthcare interventions: the framework for implementation transferability applicability reporting (FITAR)
    Baxter, Susan
    Johnson, Maxine
    Chambers, Duncan
    Sutton, Anthea
    Goyder, Elizabeth
    Booth, Andrew
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [23] Towards greater understanding of implementation during systematic reviews of complex healthcare interventions: the framework for implementation transferability applicability reporting (FITAR)
    Susan Baxter
    Maxine Johnson
    Duncan Chambers
    Anthea Sutton
    Elizabeth Goyder
    Andrew Booth
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19
  • [24] Stroke Quality Metrics Systematic Reviews of the Relationships to Patient-Centered Outcomes and Impact of Public Reporting
    Parker, Carol
    Schwamm, Lee H.
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    Smith, Eric E.
    Reeves, Mathew J.
    STROKE, 2012, 43 (01) : 155 - 162
  • [25] IMPACT OF OUTCOME REPORTING BIAS Do systematic reviews still exclude studies with "no relevant outcome data"?
    Dwan, Kerry M.
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 358
  • [26] High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews
    Jones, AP
    Remmington, T
    Williamson, PR
    Ashby, D
    Smyth, RL
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (07) : 741 - 742
  • [27] Librarians' Participation in the Systematic Reviews Published by Iranian Researchers and Its Impact on the Quality of Reporting Search Strategy
    Eskrootchi, Rogheyeh
    Mohammadi, Azita Shahraki
    Panahi, Sirous
    Zahedi, Razieh
    EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE, 2020, 15 (02): : 70 - 85
  • [28] Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study
    Kahale, Lara A.
    Khamis, Assem M.
    Diab, Batoul
    Chang, Yaping
    Lopes, Luciane Cruz
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Li, Ling
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Koujanian, Serge
    Waziry, Reem
    Busse, Jason W.
    Dakik, Abeer
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Scholten, Rob J. P. M.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Akl, Elie A.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 370
  • [29] The "quality" of JBI qualitative research synthesis: a methodological investigation into the adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance
    Munn, Zachary
    Dias, Mafalda
    Tufanaru, Catalin
    Porritt, Kylie
    Stern, Cindy
    Jordan, Zoe
    Aromataris, Edoardo
    Pearson, Alan
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (05) : 1119 - 1139
  • [30] New Zealand operating expense disclosure The impact of international financial reporting standards on early adopters
    Balshaw, Vanessa
    Lont, David
    PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2010, 22 (02) : 108 - +
12345