Quality assessment in undergraduate medical training: how to bridge the gap between what we do and what we should do

被引:0
|
作者
Brits, Hanneke [1 ]
Bezuidenhout, Johan [2 ]
Van der Merwe, Lynette Jean [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Free State, Sch Clin Med, Dept Family Med, Bloemfontein, South Africa
[2] Univ Free State, Hlth Sci Educ, Fac Hlth Sci, Bloemfontein, South Africa
[3] Univ Free State, Sch Clin Med, Undergrad Programme Management, Bloemfontein, South Africa
来源
关键词
Quality assessment; focus group interview; clinical competence; FOCUS GROUP;
D O I
10.11604/pamj.2020.36.79.23658
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: the outcome of the undergraduate medical training programme in South Africa is to produce competent medical doctors who can integrate knowledge, skills and attitudes relevant to the South African context. Training facilities have a responsibility to ensure that they perform this assessment of competence effectively and defend the results of high-stakes assessments. This study aimed to obtain qualitative data to suggest practical recommendations on best assessment practices to address the gaps between theoretical principles that inform assessment and current assessment practices. Methods: a focus group interview was used to gather this data. The teaching and learning coordinators for five of the six modules that are offered in the clinical phase of the undergraduate medical programme participated in the focus group interview. The focus group interview proceeded as planned and took 95 minutes to complete. The responses were transcribed and recorded on a matrix. Results: the lack of formal feedback to students was identified as an area of concern; feedback plays an important role to promote student learning and improve patient care. The role of teaching and learning coordinators as drivers of quality assessment were recognized and supported. All participants agreed on the outcome of the programme and the central role of the outcome in all assessments. Conclusion: the training of assessors and the implementation of workplace-based assessment and assessment portfolios were recommended and can also address feasibility challenges. Participants recommended decreasing summative assessments and only performing these for borderline students.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do?
    Martha J. Farah
    Judy Illes
    Robert Cook-Deegan
    Howard Gardner
    Eric Kandel
    Patricia King
    Eric Parens
    Barbara Sahakian
    Paul Root Wolpe
    [J]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2004, 5 : 421 - 425
  • [22] Prevention and Pharmacovigilance What Should We Do, What Can We Do?
    Edwards, I. Ralph
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2012, 35 (02) : 87 - 90
  • [23] Comment on “Medical Students Who Do Not Match to Psychiatry: What Should They Do, and What Should We Do?”
    Mehreteab Y. Mengsteab
    J. M. Monica van de Ridder
    [J]. Academic Psychiatry, 2021, 45 : 780 - 781
  • [24] Comment on "Medical Students Who Do Not Match to Psychiatry: What Should They Do, and What Should We Do?"
    Mengsteab, Mehreteab Y.
    van de Ridder, J. M. Monica
    [J]. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 45 (06) : 780 - 781
  • [25] CHOLESTEROL POLICY - WHAT SHOULD WE DO - HOW SHOULD WE DECIDE
    KOTTKE, TE
    BREKKE, ML
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (10) : 1023 - 1027
  • [26] What we do, how we do it and where
    Palomo-Lovinski, Noel
    [J]. DESIGN JOURNAL, 2023, 26 (02): : 185 - 187
  • [27] HOW DO WE EVALUATE WHAT WE DO
    MCEWAN, SR
    RITCHIE, LD
    [J]. CORONARY RISK FACTORS REVISITED, 1989, 855 : 93 - 101
  • [28] Assessment training in clinical psychology doctoral programs: What should we teach? What do we teach?
    Childs, RA
    Eyde, LD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2002, 78 (01) : 130 - 144
  • [29] Justice. Do we do what we should?
    Garzon Vallejo, Ivan
    [J]. ESTUDIOS DE DERECHO, 2012, 69 (153):
  • [30] Stroke units: what do they do and what should we do?
    Mousavi, Seyed Ali
    Fatehi, Farzad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 13 (05): : 268 - 280