Secondhand Smoke Exposure in the Nonsmoking Section: How Much Protection?

被引:7
|
作者
Bohac, David L. [1 ]
Hewett, Martha J. [1 ]
Kapphahn, Kristopher I. [1 ]
Novacheck, Joshua [1 ]
Grimsrud, David T. [2 ,3 ]
Apte, Michael G. [4 ]
Gundel, Lara A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Energy & Environm, Minneapolis, MN 55401 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Bioprod Engn, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Biosyst Engn, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE; BARS; HEALTH; PUBS;
D O I
10.1093/ntr/nts263
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure continues to be a problem in bars and restaurants where smoking is permitted. This study measures the relative SHS exposure reduction in nonsmoking sections of establishments that allow some smoking. Measurements were conducted simultaneously in the smoking and nonsmoking sections of 14 Minnesota hospitality venues. All of the 16 two-hr visits included photometer measurements of fine particles (PM2.5) and 12 of the visits also included measurements of 4 gas-phase tracers of SHS. The median ratio of nonsmoking/smoking section PM2.5 concentrations was 0.65 with an interquartile range (IQR) of 0.490.72. Measurements conducted after implementation of a smoking ban at 13 of the venues resulted in a smoking section PM2.5 post-ban/pre-ban ratio of 0.06 (IQR 0.020.16). The median nonsmoking/smoking section ratios for gas-phase compound were 0.67 (IQR 0.350.78) for pyridine, 0.52 (IQR 0.300.70) for pyrrole, 0.43 (IQR 0.350.84) for 3-EP, and 0.27 (IQR 0.160.47) for nicotine. These results are consistent with the expectations of differential removal: the lowest ratios are for the least volatile, most strongly sorbing gases and the highest ratios for less sorbing gases and PM2.5. Designated nonsmoking sections in establishments that allow some smoking resulted in a median PM2.5 reduction of 35% compared with a 94% reduction after a smoking ban. The only adequate protection from cigarette smoke exposure is to eliminate smoking in indoor spaces.
引用
收藏
页码:1265 / 1272
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Relationship Between Secondhand Smoke Exposure, Pro-Tobacco Social Influences, and Smoking Susceptibility Among Nonsmoking Zambian Adolescents
    Agaku, Israel Terungwa
    Maliselo, Tino
    Ayo-Yusuf, Olalekan A.
    SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2015, 50 (03) : 387 - 393
  • [42] Acute vs chronic secondhand smoke exposure
    Bruintjes, Gerrit
    Krantz, Mori J.
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 167 (07) : 731 - 731
  • [43] Secondhand smoke exposure in Alaskan households with children
    Dent, C. W.
    Maher, J. E.
    Pizacani, B. A.
    Dowler, D. W.
    Rohde, K.
    Peterson, E.
    RURAL AND REMOTE HEALTH, 2010, 10 (04):
  • [44] Secondhand smoke exposure at home in rural China
    Yao, Tingting
    Sung, Hai-Yen
    Mao, Zhengzhong
    Hu, Teh-wei
    Max, Wendy
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2012, 23 : 109 - 115
  • [45] Limiting Vulnerable Infants' Secondhand Smoke Exposure
    Slomski, Anita
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (16): : 1543 - 1543
  • [46] Secondhand Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Motor Vehicles
    Jones, M.
    Navas-Acien, A.
    Yuan, J.
    Wipfli, H.
    Samet, J. M.
    Breysse, P. N.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (06) : S346 - S346
  • [47] Is Exposure to Secondhand Smoke Child Abuse? No.
    Lindhorst, Taryn
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 13 (02) : 105 - 106
  • [48] Secondhand Smoke and Adverse Fetal Outcomes in Nonsmoking Pregnant Women: A Meta-analysis
    Leonardi-Bee, Jo
    Britton, John
    Venn, Andrea
    PEDIATRICS, 2011, 127 (04) : 734 - 741
  • [49] Mitigating residential exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke
    Klepeis, Neil E.
    Nazaroff, William W.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (23) : 4408 - 4422
  • [50] Secondhand smoke exposure and the risk of hearing loss
    Fabry, David A.
    Davila, Evelyn P.
    Arheart, Kristopher L.
    Serdar, Berrin
    Dietz, Noella A.
    Bandiera, Frank C.
    Lee, David J.
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2011, 20 (01) : 82 - 85