Daily shifts in regulatory focus: The influence of work events and implications for employee well-being

被引:76
|
作者
Koopmann, Jaclyn [1 ]
Lanaj, Klodiana [1 ]
Bono, Joyce [1 ]
Campana, Kristie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Warrington Coll Business Adm, Dept Management, POB 117165, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Minnesota State Univ Mankato, Dept Psychol, Mankato, MN USA
关键词
regulatory focus; work events; well-being; spillover; LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE; HEALTH COMPLAINTS; MULTILEVEL MODELS; POSITIVE EVENTS; NEGATIVE AFFECT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SYSTEM-THEORY; DAILY MOOD; RESOURCES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1002/job.2105
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although theory suggests that regulatory focus fluctuates within person and such fluctuations impact employee well-being, there is little empirical investigation of such propositions. These are important research questions to address because work events may elicit within-person fluctuations in regulatory focus, which can then affect well-being. The primary purpose of this study is to examine specific predictors of daily regulatory focus at work and the foci's impact on employee well-being at work and home as indicated by mood and psychosomatic complaints, respectively. We present and test an overarching theoretical framework that integrates conservation of resources theory, the cognitive-affective processing system framework, and regulatory focus theory to delineate why and when work events affect regulatory focus and how the foci affect well-being. Consistent with our expectations, we found that positive work events positively predicted daily promotion focus, but this effect was weaker when employees had high-quality relationships with leaders. Furthermore, daily regulatory focus was associated with employee well-being (mood and psychosomatic complaints) such that (i) promotion focus improved well-being; (ii) prevention focus reduced well-being; and (iii) the effects of promotion focus on well-being were strongest when prevention focus was low. We discuss theoretical and practical implications and offer directions for future research. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1293 / 1316
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Organizational ethical climate: influence on employee meaning and well-being
    Pandey, Jayesh
    Kumar, Manish
    Singh, Shailendra
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2024,
  • [32] The influence of interpersonal relationships on job characteristics and employee well-being
    Sundaram, Suresh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 521 - 521
  • [33] Implications of Work Effort and Discretion for Employee Well-Being and Career-Related Outcomes: An Integrative Assessment
    Avgoustaki, Argyro
    Frankort, Hans T. W.
    [J]. ILR REVIEW, 2019, 72 (03) : 636 - 661
  • [34] Work-family supportive benefits, programs, and policies and employee well-being: Implications for the hospitality industry
    Kim, Misun
    Ma, Emily
    Wang, Liang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2023, 108
  • [35] A daily diary study of goals and affective well-being at work
    Harris, C
    Daniels, K
    Briner, RB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 76 : 401 - 410
  • [36] When the good may be stronger than the bad: Perceived influence of daily events on well-being
    Nezlek, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01): : 10 - 20
  • [37] Mindfulness, Work Climate, and Psychological Need Satisfaction in Employee Well-being
    Patricia P. Schultz
    Richard M. Ryan
    Christopher P. Niemiec
    Nicole Legate
    Geoffrey C. Williams
    [J]. Mindfulness, 2015, 6 : 971 - 985
  • [38] Does nature work? Effects of workplace greenery on employee well-being
    Popov, Boris
    Popov, Snezana
    Nastran, Mojca
    [J]. PRIMENJENA PSIHOLOGIJA, 2023, 16 (01): : 29 - 58
  • [39] Employee well-being: A multilevel model linking work and nonwork domains
    Ilies, Remus
    Schwind, Kelly M.
    Heller, Daniel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 16 (03) : 326 - 341
  • [40] Recovery after work experiences, employee well-being and intent to quit
    Singh, Parbudyal
    Burke, Ronald J.
    Boekhorst, Janet
    [J]. PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2016, 45 (02) : 232 - 254