Ethical Concepts and Future Challenges of Neuroimaging: An Islamic Perspective

被引:4
|
作者
Al-Delaimy, Wael K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Family & Prevent Med, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
关键词
Islam; Ethics; Neuroethics; Neuroscience; Neuroimaging;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-012-9386-3
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Neuroscience is advancing at a rapid pace, with new technologies and approaches that are creating ethical challenges not easily addressed by current ethical frameworks and guidelines. One fascinating technology is neuroimaging, especially functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Although still in its infancy, fMRI is breaking new ground in neuroscience, potentially offering increased understanding of brain function. Different populations and faith traditions will likely have different reactions to these new technologies and the ethical challenges they bring with them. Muslims are approximately one-fifth of world population and they have a specific and highly regulated ethical and moral code, which helps them deal with scientific advances and decision making processes in an Islamically ethical manner. From this ethical perspective, in light of the relevant tenets of Islam, neuroimaging poses various challenges. The privacy of spirituality and the thought process, the requirement to put community interest before individual interest, and emphasis on conscious confession in legal situations are Islamic concepts that can pose a challenge for the use of something intrusive such as an fMRI. Muslim moral concepts such as There shall be no harm inflicted or reciprocated in Islam and Necessities overrule prohibitions are some of the criteria that might appropriately be used to guide advancing neuroscience. Neuroscientists should be particularly prudent and well prepared in implementing neuroscience advances that are breaking new scientific and ethical ground. Neuroscientists should also be prepared to assist in setting the ethical frameworks in place in advance of what might be perceived as runaway applications of technology.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 518
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] FUTURE ETHICAL ISSUES IN PERINATOLOGY - A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE
    HARMAN, CR
    [J]. SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 1987, 11 (03) : 268 - 270
  • [42] Metastasis imaging: Current concepts and future challenges
    Messiou, Christina
    deSouza, Nandita M.
    [J]. CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2010, 7 (4-5) : 171 - 172
  • [43] Osteosarcoma: Current concepts, challenges and future directions
    Oryan, Ahmad
    Alidadi, Soodeh
    Moshiri, Ali
    [J]. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2015, 26 (02): : 181 - 198
  • [44] Halal tourism: Concepts, practises, challenges and future
    Battour, Mohamed
    Ismail, Mohd Nazari
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 19 : 150 - 154
  • [45] Current Concepts and Future Challenges in Facial Transplantation
    Lengele, Benoit G.
    [J]. CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2009, 36 (03) : 507 - +
  • [46] An Overview of Flood Concepts, Challenges, and Future Directions
    Mishra, Ashok
    Mukherjee, Sourav
    Merz, Bruno
    Singh, Vijay P.
    Wright, Daniel B.
    Villarini, Gabriele
    Paul, Subir
    Kumar, D. Nagesh
    Khedun, C. Prakash
    Niyogi, Dev
    Schumann, Guy
    Stedinger, Jery R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2022, 27 (06)
  • [47] Balancing Ethical Responsibility among Multiple Organizational Stakeholders: The Islamic Perspective
    Rafik I. Beekun
    Jamal A. Badawi
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2005, 60 : 131 - 145
  • [48] ETHICAL OVERVIEW OF PLACEBO CONTROL IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH - CONCEPTS AND CHALLENGES
    Curkovic, Marko
    Zivkovic, Maja
    Radic, Kresimir
    Vilibic, Maja
    Celic, Ivan
    Bagaric, Dario
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIA DANUBINA, 2015, 27 (02) : 118 - 125
  • [49] Ethical and Islamic Banking Compared from a Time-Based Perspective
    Francesc Relano
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2023, 188 : 795 - 805
  • [50] Balancing ethical responsibility among multiple organizational stakeholders: The Islamic perspective
    Beekun, RI
    Badawi, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2005, 60 (02) : 131 - 145