Phase I study of liposomal irinotecan in patients with metastatic breast cancer: findings from the expansion phase

被引:28
|
作者
Sachdev, Jasgit C. [1 ,2 ]
Munster, Pamela [3 ]
Northfelt, Donald W. [4 ]
Han, Hyo Sook [5 ]
Ma, Cynthia [6 ]
Maxwell, Fiona [7 ]
Wang, Tiffany [8 ]
Belanger, Bruce [8 ]
Zhang, Bin [8 ]
Moore, Yan [8 ]
Thiagalingam, Arunthathi [8 ]
Anders, Carey [9 ]
机构
[1] HonorHlth Res Inst, 10510 N 92nd St,Suite 200, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 USA
[2] Translat Genom Res Inst, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Mayo Clin Hosp, Phoenix, AZ USA
[5] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL USA
[6] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO USA
[7] Ipsen, Abingdon, Oxon, England
[8] Ipsen, Cambridge, MA USA
[9] Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC USA
关键词
Liposomal irinotecan; Metastatic breast cancer; Objective response rate; Phase I clinical trial; Brain metastases; Heavily pretreated patients; ETIRINOTECAN PEGOL NKTR-102; NANOLIPOSOMAL IRINOTECAN; ANTITUMOR-ACTIVITY; PLUS CAPECITABINE; 2ND-LINE THERAPY; BRAIN METASTASES; PEP02; MM-398; ANTHRACYCLINE; TRIAL; TAXANE;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-020-05995-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains incurable and is associated with low survival rates. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan in heavily pretreated patients with mBC, with or without active brain metastases (BM). Methods Following the dose escalation phase and determination of recommended phase 2 dose, the expansion phase of this phase I, open-label, non-randomized study, assigned adult women to cohorts based on mBC subtype: cohort 1, hormone receptor +/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-; cohort 2, triple-negative breast cancer; or cohort 3, any mBC subtype with active BM. Patients received liposomal irinotecan 50 or 70 mg/m(2) free base every 2 weeks. Here, we report secondary outcomes including best overall response (BOR), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results For non-central nervous system (non-CNS) disease across all cohorts (intent-to-treat population, N = 29), the ORR was 34.5% (95% confidence interval: 17.94-54.33), with a BOR of partial response in 10 patients (34.5%), stable disease in five (17.2%), progressive disease in 10 (34.5%); four patients were unevaluable (13.8%). The ORR for the CNS cohort was 30.0% (95% confidence interval: 6.67-65.25) using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Common grade 3 or higher TEAEs were diarrhea (27.6%), nausea (17.2%), fatigue (13.8%), asthenia (10.3%), and hypokalemia (10.3%). Serious treatment-related TEAEs were reported in six patients (20.7%). No treatment-related TEAEs resulted in death. Conclusions Liposomal irinotecan monotherapy demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with mBC, with or without BM. The observed safety profile was consistent with that in previous studies.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 771
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gemcitabine and epirubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer:: A phase I/II study
    Campone, Mario
    Fumoleau, Pierre
    Viens, Patrice
    Dieras, Wronique
    Pujade-Lauraine, Eric
    Serin, Daniel
    Petit, Thierry
    Espie, Marc
    Kayitalire, Louis
    Bozec, Laurence
    Pouillart, Pierre
    BREAST, 2006, 15 (05): : 601 - 609
  • [22] Phase II study of irinotecan plus capecitabine in patients with anthracycline and taxane pretreated metastatic breast cancer
    Lee, K. S.
    Ro, J.
    Park, I. H.
    Kim, E. A.
    Nam, B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15)
  • [23] Irinotecan combined with docetaxel in pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study
    G. P. Stathopoulos
    D. Tsavdaridis
    N. A. Malamos
    S. K. Rigatos
    Ch. Kosmas
    N. Pergantas
    J. G. Stathopoulos
    J. Xynotroulas
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2005, 56 : 487 - 491
  • [24] Irinotecan combined with docetaxel in pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study
    Stathopoulos, GP
    Tsavdaridis, D
    Malamos, NA
    Rigatos, SK
    Kosmas, C
    Pergantas, N
    Stathopoulos, JG
    Xynotroulas, J
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 56 (05) : 487 - 491
  • [25] A Phase I Study of a Combination of Liposomal Irinotecan and Veliparib in Solid Tumors
    LaRose, Meredith
    Connolly, Roisin M.
    O'Sullivan, Ciara C.
    Velcheti, Vamsidhar
    Vilimas, Rasa
    Gano, Katherine
    Bates, Susan E.
    Pommier, Yves
    Thomas, Anish
    ONCOLOGIST, 2023, 28 (05): : 460 - +
  • [26] A phase I trial of lomeguatrib and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer
    A. Sabharwal
    P. G. Corrie
    R. S. Midgley
    C. Palmer
    J. Brady
    P. Mortimer
    A. J. Watson
    G. P. Margison
    M. R. Middleton
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2010, 66 : 829 - 835
  • [27] A phase I trial of lomeguatrib and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Sabharwal, A.
    Corrie, P.
    Seebaran, A.
    Anderson, D.
    Carmichael, J.
    Mortimer, P.
    Margison, G. P.
    Watson, A.
    Middleton, M. R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [28] A phase I trial of lomeguatrib and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Sabharwal, A.
    Corrie, P. G.
    Midgley, R. S.
    Palmer, C.
    Brady, J.
    Mortimer, P.
    Watson, A. J.
    Margison, G. P.
    Middleton, M. R.
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 66 (05) : 829 - 835
  • [29] Phase I study of weekly oxaliplatin plus irinotecan in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Kemeny, N
    Tong, W
    Gonen, M
    Stockman, J
    Di Lauro, C
    Teitcher, J
    White, P
    Price, C
    Saltz, L
    Sharma, S
    Graham, MA
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (09) : 1490 - 1496
  • [30] Phase I study of irinotecan and S-1 combination therapy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer
    Yasuhide Yamada
    Hisateru Yasui
    Ayumu Goto
    Tatsuhiro Arai
    Takashi Ura
    Tetsuya Hamaguchi
    Kei Muro
    Yasuhiro Shimada
    Kuniaki Shirao
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003, 8 (6) : 374 - 380