Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England

被引:438
|
作者
Kay, A. L. [1 ]
Davies, H. N. [1 ]
Bell, V. A. [1 ]
Jones, R. G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England
[2] Univ Reading, Met Off Hadley Ctr, Reading Unit, Reading RG6 6BB, Berks, England
关键词
CONTINUOUS SIMULATION; CHANGE SCENARIOS; RCM RAINFALL; MODEL DATA; RUNOFF; UK; CATCHMENT; ENSEMBLE; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-008-9471-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the uncertainty in the impact of climate change on flood frequency in England, through the use of continuous simulation of river flows. Six different sources of uncertainty are discussed: future greenhouse gas emissions; Global Climate Model (GCM) structure; downscaling from GCMs (including Regional Climate Model structure); hydrological model structure; hydrological model parameters and the internal variability of the climate system (sampled by applying different GCM initial conditions). These sources of uncertainty are demonstrated (separately) for two example catchments in England, by propagation through to flood frequency impact. The results suggest that uncertainty from GCM structure is by far the largest source of uncertainty. However, this is due to the extremely large increases in winter rainfall predicted by one of the five GCMs used. Other sources of uncertainty become more significant if the results from this GCM are omitted, although uncertainty from sources relating to modelling of the future climate is generally still larger than that relating to emissions or hydrological modelling. It is also shown that understanding current and future natural variability is critical in assessing the importance of climate change impacts on hydrology.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:41 / 63
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England
    A. L. Kay
    H. N. Davies
    V. A. Bell
    R. G. Jones
    Climatic Change, 2009, 92 : 41 - 63
  • [2] Probabilistic impacts of climate change on flood frequency using response surfaces I: England and Wales
    A. L. Kay
    S. M. Crooks
    H. N. Davies
    C. Prudhomme
    N. S. Reynard
    Regional Environmental Change, 2014, 14 : 1215 - 1227
  • [3] Probabilistic impacts of climate change on flood frequency using response surfaces I: England and Wales
    Kay, A. L.
    Crooks, S. M.
    Davies, H. N.
    Prudhomme, C.
    Reynard, N. S.
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2014, 14 (03) : 1215 - 1227
  • [4] Uncertainty Analysis of Climate Change Impacts on Flood Frequency by Using Hybrid Machine Learning Methods
    Mahdi Valikhan Anaraki
    Saeed Farzin
    Sayed-Farhad Mousavi
    Hojat Karami
    Water Resources Management, 2021, 35 : 199 - 223
  • [5] Uncertainty Analysis of Climate Change Impacts on Flood Frequency by Using Hybrid Machine Learning Methods
    Anaraki, Mahdi Valikhan
    Farzin, Saeed
    Mousavi, Sayed-Farhad
    Karami, Hojat
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2021, 35 (01) : 199 - 223
  • [6] Climate Change and Multi-Reservoirs Impacts on Extreme Flood: Nonstationary Regional Frequency Analysis and Uncertainty Estimation
    Du, Hong
    Xia, Jun
    Zeng, Sidong
    Tu, Yike
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, 38 (03) : 951 - 965
  • [7] Climate Change and Multi-Reservoirs Impacts on Extreme Flood: Nonstationary Regional Frequency Analysis and Uncertainty Estimation
    Hong Du
    Jun Xia
    Sidong Zeng
    Yike Tu
    Water Resources Management, 2024, 38 : 951 - 965
  • [8] Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation under climate change (with uncertainty)
    Cameron, D
    Beven, K
    Naden, P
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (03) : 393 - 405
  • [9] Comparison of the use of alternative UKCP09 products for modelling the impacts of climate change on flood frequency
    Kay, A. L.
    Jones, R. G.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2012, 114 (02) : 211 - 230
  • [10] Comparison of the use of alternative UKCP09 products for modelling the impacts of climate change on flood frequency
    A. L. Kay
    R. G. Jones
    Climatic Change, 2012, 114 : 211 - 230