Reactions to the Fairness of Promotion Methods: Procedural justice and job satisfaction

被引:45
|
作者
Garcia-Izquierdo, Antonio L. [1 ]
Moscoso, Silvia [2 ]
Ramos-Villagrasa, Pedro J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oviedo, Fac Psychol, Oviedo 33003, Spain
[2] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac Labor Relat, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
关键词
PERSONNEL-SELECTION TECHNIQUES; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; APPLICANT REACTIONS; PERCEIVED FAIRNESS; PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; GENDER; ANTECEDENTS; PERFORMANCE; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1111/ijsa.12002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Fairness in promotions is a core issue for organizations as it is directly related to some of the most important organizational outcomes. However, the majority of the existing research about this question has been focused on entry-level selection, and there is a gap in knowledge in the context of promotions. This paper focuses on how workers perceptions of promotion systems affect organizational justice and job satisfaction. In the present study, 213 employees and supervisors from 31 different private sector organizations complete a survey regarding procedural justice (PJ), job satisfaction, transparency, promotion systems, and some demographic variables. The results show that participants who perceived organizational promotion methods as transparent reported a high level of perceived PJ, and that the methods they see as fairer are those based on assessment of performance. In addition, transparency is considered as an important antecedent of PJ. Moreover, the interaction between organizational rank and gender moderates the relationship between transparency and promotion systems with PJ. Finally, organizational justice is strongly related with job satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 403
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The impact of distributive and procedural justice on correctional staff job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment
    Lambert, Eric G.
    Hogan, Nancy L.
    Griffin, Marie L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2007, 35 (06) : 644 - 656
  • [12] The effects of distributive and procedural justice on job satisfaction and organizational commitment ofcorrectional staff
    Lambert, Eric G.
    Keena, Linda D.
    Leone, Matthew
    May, David
    Haynes, Stacy H.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2020, 57 (04): : 405 - 416
  • [13] The moderating effect of negative affectivity in the procedural justice-job satisfaction relation
    Irving, PG
    Coleman, DF
    Bobocel, DR
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 2005, 37 (01): : 20 - 32
  • [14] Is more fairness always preferred? Self-esteem moderates reactions to procedural justice
    Wiesenfeld, Batia M.
    Swann, William B., Jr.
    Brockner, Joel
    Bartel, Caroline A.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (05): : 1235 - 1253
  • [15] Procedural justice and perceptions of fairness in selection practice
    Harris, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, 8 (03) : 148 - 157
  • [16] Fairness as partiality aversion: The development of procedural justice
    Shaw, Alex
    Olson, Kristina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 119 : 40 - 53
  • [17] Is there a difference between "natural justice" and "procedural fairness"?
    Maxwell, Justice
    Stone, Adrienne
    Goldsworthy, Jeff
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 2016, 23 (03): : 143 - 143
  • [18] Procedural justice influencing affective commitment: mediating role of organizational trust and job satisfaction
    Pathardikar, Avinash D.
    Mishra, Praveen Kumar
    Sahu, Sangeeta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIA BUSINESS STUDIES, 2023, 17 (02) : 371 - 384
  • [19] Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being
    Schmitt, M
    Dörfel, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 29 (04) : 443 - 453
  • [20] Economic Evaluations, Procedural Fairness, and Satisfaction with Democracy
    Magalhaes, Pedro C.
    [J]. POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2016, 69 (03) : 522 - 534