Comparison of the amplitude/intensity function of the auditory evoked N1m and N1 components

被引:19
|
作者
Neukirch, M [1 ]
Hegerl, U
Kötitz, R
Dorn, H
Gallinat, U
Herrmann, WM
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Lab Clin Psychophysiol, Dept Psychiat, D-14050 Berlin, Germany
[2] Maximilian Univ, Dept Psychiat, Munich, Germany
[3] Phys Tech Bundesanstalt, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
[4] Parexel Int Corp, Waltham, MA USA
关键词
intensity coding; auditory evoked magnetic fields; auditory evoked electric potentials; neuromagnetism; dipole source analysis;
D O I
10.1159/000048672
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study compared the intensity dependence of the auditory evoked N1 and N1m components in 10 healthy subjects. The evoked responses were recorded simultaneously at 33 channels for the auditory evoked potentials (AEP) and with a 37-channel magnetometer for the auditory evoked fields (AEF). They were satisfactorily modeled by a tangential and a radial dipole per hemisphere for the N1 component and a tangential dipole in the left hemisphere for the N1m component. The tangential dipoles showed different dipole characteristics. The amplitude of the AEP rose significantly with increasing stimulus intensity whereas the amplitudes of the AEF tended to plateau between the highest intensities. The magnetic dipole shifted to the surface of the skull with higher stimulus intensity whereas the electric tangential dipole moved to the center of the skull. The latencies decreased with increasing stimulus intensity. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 48
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EGDD(n1 + n2, 3; λ1, λ2) for n1=2 and n1=5
    Billings, Blaine
    Namyalo, Kasifa
    Sarvate, Dinesh G.
    ARS COMBINATORIA, 2020, 150 : 281 - 293
  • [42] EGDD(n1 + n2, 3; λ1, λ2) for n1=2 and n1=5
    Billings, Blaine
    Namyalo, Kasifa
    Sarvate, Dinesh G.
    ARS COMBINATORIA, 2020, 149 : 123 - 135
  • [43] Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: Hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain
    Tiitinen H.
    Mäkelä A.M.
    Mäkinen V.
    May P.J.C.
    Alku P.
    BMC Neuroscience, 6 (1)
  • [44] Abnormal auditory temporal processing in autistic children as assessed by cortical auditory evoked potentials (N1 wave)
    Bruneau, N
    Adrien, JL
    Dansart, P
    Roux, S
    Barthélémy, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 30 (1-2) : 48 - 49
  • [45] THE EFFECTS OF STIMULUS FREQUENCY AND RECORDING SITE ON THE AMPLITUDE AND LATENCY OF MULTICHANNEL CORTICAL AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIAL (CAEP) COMPONENT N1
    JACOBSON, GP
    LOMBARDI, DM
    GIBBENS, ND
    AHMAD, BK
    NEWMAN, CW
    EAR AND HEARING, 1992, 13 (05): : 300 - 306
  • [46] Topography of auditory evoked cortical potentials in children with severe language impairment: The N1 component
    TonnquistUhlen, I
    Borg, E
    Persson, HE
    Spens, KE
    EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 100 (03): : 250 - 260
  • [47] Functional neural dynamics underlying auditory event-related N1 and N1 suppression response
    Grau, C.
    Fuentemilla, Ll.
    Marco-Pallares, J.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 36 (03) : 522 - 531
  • [48] Orientation sensitivity of the N1 evoked by letters and digits
    Milivojevic, Branka
    Corballis, Michael C.
    Hamm, Jeff P.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2008, 8 (10):
  • [49] MIGRAINE INCREASES N1 AMPLITUDE TO UNATTENDED SOUNDS
    Patrick, Toni A.
    Woody, Patrick L.
    Baker, Katelyn R.
    Allen-Winters, Stephanie
    Collins, April
    Sable, Jeffrey J.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 52 : S37 - S37
  • [50] Tobacco use is associated with reduced amplitude and intensity dependence of the cortical auditory evoked N1-P2 component
    Philippe Jawinski
    Nicole Mauche
    Christine Ulke
    Jue Huang
    Janek Spada
    Cornelia Enzenbach
    Christian Sander
    Ulrich Hegerl
    Tilman Hensch
    Psychopharmacology, 2016, 233 : 2173 - 2183