The pragmatic principles of agreement in Bajjika verbs

被引:4
|
作者
Kashyap, Abhishek Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept English, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Bajjika; Indo-Aryan; Bihari language; Verb-agreement; Systemic Functional Linguistics; TRANSITIVITY; ERGATIVITY; SPEECH; THEME;
D O I
10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.005
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This article describes verb-agreement in Bajjika, an Eastern Indo-Aryan language, and explains the pragmatic principles that determine the agreement. Bajjika has one of the most complex and indeed uncommon agreement patterns in Indo-Aryan languages. The entities encoded in the verb are PERSON, HONORIFIC DEGREE, SPATIAL DISTANCE, and GENDER, not all equally encoded. The verb allows nominative as well as non-nominative (double) participants and non-participants to be simultaneously encoded in the paradigm. The double agreements pose severe analytical constraints as the agreement is unusually sensitive to social factors. The agreement consistently interacts with the social hierarchy that forms the foundation of the speech community. Besides, the absence of uniformity in marking PERSON poses constraints on the predictability of agreement and its subsequent interpretation. In the process of describing Bajjika verb-agreement and the underlying principles, this study examines the relevance of Bickel et al.'s (1999) proposal for interpreting the agreement paradigms, thus providing fresh data to empirically and conceptually further understand verb-agreement and the extent to which this phenomenon can be tied to factors relevant to tenor relation. The study concludes that while face is useful in explaining Bajjika agreement paradigms, the scale of empathy proposed by Bickel et al. is irrelevant to account for data from Bajjika. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1868 / 1887
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DERIVING ISLAND CONSTRAINTS WITH SEARLE AND GRICE. A PRAGMATIC ACCOUNT OF BRIDGE VERBS
    Mueller, Sonja
    STUDIA LINGUISTICA, 2015, 69 (01) : 1 - 57
  • [42] Why some verbs allow-undefined implicit objects? A pragmatic response
    Bourmayan, Anouch
    4E CONGRES MONDIAL DE LINGUISTIQUE FRANCAISE, 2014, 8
  • [43] Development of Clinical Trial Agreement Principles
    Michelle Moldofsky
    Karen Arts
    Arthur S. Slutsky
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2010, 44 : 111 - 117
  • [44] Development of Clinical Trial Agreement Principles
    Moldofsky, Michelle
    Arts, Karen
    Slutsky, Arthur S.
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2010, 44 (02): : 111 - 117
  • [45] OUTLOOK FOR EVENTUAL AGREEMENT ON ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
    SPACEK, L
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY, 1968, 126 (04): : 61 - 63
  • [46] NEUTRALITY AND ANONYMITY OF GENERAL AGREEMENT PRINCIPLES
    KERN, L
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1980, 34 (02): : 226 - 247
  • [47] ARABIC CONJUNCTION WA: A CONFLICT IN PRAGMATIC PRINCIPLES
    Yagi, Sane M.
    Ali, Mohamed Yunis
    POZNAN STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY LINGUISTICS, 2008, 44 (04): : 617 - 627
  • [48] The application of pragmatic principles in competitive business writing
    Wu, Haihong
    ICITCE 2015 - 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND CAREER EDUCATION, 2016, 25
  • [49] KNOTS AND BLANKS - PRAGMATIC FOUNDATION OF LOGICAL PRINCIPLES
    GUTIERREZ, C
    THEORY AND DECISION, 1975, 6 (04) : 457 - 469
  • [50] Impurism, pragmatic encroachment, and the Argument from Principles
    Michael Blome-Tillmann
    Synthese, 2021, 199 : 975 - 982