This article is a response to the commentaries on the position paper on observed-score equating by van der Linden (this issue). The response focuses on the more general issues in these commentaries, such as the nature of the observed scores that are equated, the importance of test-theory assumptions in equating, the necessity to use multiple equating transformations, and the choice of conditioning variables in equating.
机构:
Psychological Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, 95343, CAPsychological Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, 95343, CA