Waitlist and transplant outcomes for patients bridged to heart transplantation with Impella 5.0 and 5.5 devices

被引:5
|
作者
Hill, Morgan A. [1 ]
Kwon, Jennie H. [1 ]
Shorbaji, Khaled [1 ]
Kilic, Arman [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Cardiothorac Surg, 30 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
heart; heart failure; outcomes; statistics; survival analysis; transplantation; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1111/jocs.17209
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Impella devices are increasingly utilized as a bridge to heart transplantation (BTT) and are now prioritized as Status 2 under the current heart allocation policy. This study evaluated waitlist and post-transplant outcomes of patients supported with Impella 5.0/5.5 devices. Methods The United Network of Organ Sharing registry was used to identify adults waitlisted or transplanted with Impella 5.0 or 5.5 devices from 2010 to 2021. Separate analyses were performed for waitlist and transplantation outcomes for patients supported by Impella 5.0/5.5 devices. Competing outcomes for the waitlist analysis included rates of transplantation, recovery, and death or clinical deterioration. Among patients undergoing transplantation, the primary outcome was 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes included rates of rejection, new postoperative dialysis, stroke, and pacemaker implantation after transplantation. Results There were 344 patients waitlisted and 394 patients transplanted with an Impella 5.0 (n = 212 and 251) or 5.5 (n = 132 and 143) device. Competing risk regression demonstrated similar likelihood of transplant (subhazard ratio [SHR], 1.33 (0.98-1.81, p = 0.067)) and similar likelihood of death or clinical deterioration (SHR, 0.67 [0.27-1.69, p = 0.400]) for Impella 5.5 patients. In the transplanted cohort, unadjusted 1-year post-transplant survival was comparable at 91.3% versus 94.6% (log-rank p = 0.661) for patients supported by Impella 5.0 or 5.5 device, respectively, a finding that persisted after risk-adjustment (HR 1.22, p = 0.699). Post-transplant complication rates were also comparable between 5.0 and 5.5 patients. Conclusions Impella devices can be used as a BTT with excellent survival and minimal post-transplant morbidity. Outcomes were comparable for Impella 5.0 and 5.5 devices.
引用
收藏
页码:5081 / 5089
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality of life outcomes after heart transplantation in individuals bridged to transplant with ventricular assist devices
    Dew, MA
    Kormos, RL
    Winowich, S
    Harris, RC
    Stanford, EA
    Carozza, L
    Griffith, BP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 20 (11): : 1199 - 1212
  • [22] Outcomes in Patients Bridged With Univentricular and Biventricular Devices in the Modern Era of Heart Transplantation
    Grimm, Joshua C.
    Sciortino, Christopher M.
    Magruder, J. Trent
    Dungan, Samuel P.
    Valero, Vicente, III
    Sharma, Kavita
    Tedford, Ryan J.
    Russell, Stuart D.
    Whitman, Glenn J. R.
    Silvestry, Scott C.
    Shah, Ashish S.
    Toeg, Hadi D.
    Ruel, Marc
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 102 (01): : 102 - 108
  • [23] Outcomes after heart transplantation in sensitized patients bridged with ventricular assist devices
    Fraser, Charles D., III
    Zhou, Xun
    Magruder, J. Trent
    Suarez-Pierre, Alejandro
    Lui, Cecillia
    Grimm, Joshua C.
    Higgins, Robert
    Kilic, Ahmet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2019, 34 (06) : 474 - 481
  • [24] Pediatric waitlist and heart transplant outcomes in patients with syndromic anomalies
    Wilkens, Sarah J.
    Priest, James
    Kaufman, Beth D.
    Barkoff, Lynsey
    Rosenthal, David N.
    Hollander, Seth A.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 24 (01)
  • [25] Successful extended use of Impella 5.5 as a bridge to heart transplantation
    Sharaf, Omar M.
    Diaz-Ayllon, Hannia P.
    Myers, Elisha M.
    Ahmed, Mustafa M.
    Bleiweis, Mark S.
    Jeng, Eric, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2023, 2023 (06):
  • [26] Six-Month Post-Transplant Outcomes in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplantation with IABP or Impella Following 2018 UNOS Allocation Policy Change
    Lee, R. O., Jr.
    Vaidya, A. S.
    Wolfson, A. M.
    DePasquale, E. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S256 - S256
  • [27] GDMT in Patients on Impella 5.0/5.5 Support: Feasibility and Trend Over Time
    Pieri, M.
    Baldetti, L.
    Altizio, S.
    Nardelli, P.
    Ortalda, A.
    Fominskiy, E.
    Ajello, S.
    Scandroglio, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 43 (04): : S347 - S348
  • [28] Comparative Clinical Outcomes with the Initial Use of Impella CP versus Impella 5.0 Devices in Patients with Severe Cardiogenic Shock
    Tank, Rikin
    Cheng, Richard
    Ramzy, Danny
    Esmailian, Fardad
    Kobashigawa, Jon
    Moriguchi, Jaime
    Arabia, Francisco
    Azarbal, Babak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (18) : B227 - B228
  • [29] Cardiogenic Shock In Heart Transplant Candidates - Improved Outcome With Impella 5.5
    Freundt, Miriam
    Devich, Robert
    Mahesh, Balakrishnan
    Eisen, Howard J.
    Soleimani, Behzad
    Dowling, Robert D.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2022, 146
  • [30] Impella 5.5 as Bridge to Heart Transplant Improves Mobility and Length of Stay after Transplant
    Horman, J. Yet Kwong
    Mohan, P.
    Patel, S.
    Freundt, M.
    Dowling, R.
    Eisen, H.
    Mahesh, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 42 (04): : S337 - S338