Improving the Hearing Status Discrimination of the Health Utilities Index, Mark 3: Design of the Hearing Status Classification System

被引:3
|
作者
Dixon, Peter R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Feeny, David [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Tomlinson, George [2 ,3 ]
Cushing, Sharon L. [7 ]
Chen, Joseph M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, San Diego, CA USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Toronto Hlth Econ & Technol Assessment THETA Coll, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Econ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] Hlth Utilities Incorporated, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Health utility; Health-related quality of life; Hearing loss; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREFERENCE-BASED MEASURES;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000003689
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveRedesign the health status classification system of the Health Utilities Index, Mark 3 (HUI-3) "hearing" attribute to improve its discrimination of hearing-impaired health states.Study DesignDomain and item selection from a previously generated item set guided by a domain and item importance survey, structural independence, and cognitive interviews with patients.SettingTertiary referral center.ParticipantsPatients with a range of hearing loss severities, etiologies, and treatment experiences participated in the domain and item importance survey (n = 108) and hour-long cognitive interviews (n = 10).Main Outcome and Measure(s)Subattributes and levels for the novel Hearing attribute. Domain and item importance was scored on a seven-point Likert scale (1, not at all important; 7, extremely important).ResultsMean domain importance was highest for "speech in noise" (6.21; 95% confidence interval, 5.98-6.43) and lowest for "benefits of hearing loss" (3.46; 95% confidence interval, 3.03-3.89). Domains with moderate or greater (r >= 0.5) domain importance Pearson correlation or construct overlap that interfered with structural independence were combined into single subattributes. Iterative adjustments to instructions, items, and phrasing were guided by cognitive interviews to derive the final instrument with seven subattributes: speech, environmental sounds, localization, listening effort, tinnitus, music, and assistive devices. The novel hearing attribute defines 25,920 unique hearing states.ConclusionThe novel HUI-hearing is part of a comprehensive health utility instrument designed for individuals with hearing loss. Pending derivation of a hearing single attribute utility function and evaluation of measurement properties, our innovative approach could be used to improve health utility measurement for impairments described by any of the other HUI-3 attributes.
引用
收藏
页码:E1069 / E1076
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Measuring health status and decline in at-risk seniors residing in the community using the Health Utilities Index Mark 2
    Zhang, Jenny X.
    Walker, Jennifer D.
    Wodchis, Walter P.
    Hogan, David B.
    Feeny, David H.
    Maxwell, Colleen J.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (08) : 1415 - 1426
  • [12] Determining clinically important differences in health status measures - A general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II
    Samsa, G
    Edelman, D
    Rothman, ML
    Williams, GR
    Lipscomb, J
    Matchar, D
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1999, 15 (02) : 141 - 155
  • [13] Health Status of Adults with Hearing Loss in the United States
    Glassman, Jennifer
    Jordan, Timothy
    Sheu, Jiunn-Jye
    Pakulski, Lori
    Thompson, Amy
    AUDIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (01) : 100 - 111
  • [14] Health status of hearing-impaired children and adolescents
    Kirman, Asli
    Sari, Hatice Yildirim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2013, 19 (03) : 233 - 240
  • [15] A multiplicative multi-attribute utility function for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system
    Feeny, D
    Torrance, G
    Furlong, W
    Goldsmith, C
    Zhu, Z
    DePauw, S
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1997, 6 (7-8) : 103 - 103
  • [16] Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system
    Feeny, D
    Furlong, W
    Torrance, GW
    Goldsmith, CH
    Zhu, ZL
    DePauw, S
    Denton, M
    Boyle, M
    MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (02) : 113 - 128
  • [17] Barriers to Hearing Health Care: Current Status and a Glimpse at the Future
    Pratt, Sheila R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2010, 19 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [18] Options for handling missing data in the Health Utilities Index Mark 3
    Naeim, A
    Keeler, EB
    Mangione, CM
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2005, 25 (02) : 186 - 198
  • [19] Evaluation of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 in Heart Failure
    Pressler, Susan J.
    Eckert, George J.
    Morrison, Gwendolyn C.
    Murray, Michael D.
    Oldridge, Neil B.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2011, 17 (02) : 143 - 150
  • [20] What were they thinking? The evidence for the health utilities index mark 3
    Furlong, William
    Torrance, George
    Feeny, David
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 23 - 23