Improving the Hearing Status Discrimination of the Health Utilities Index, Mark 3: Design of the Hearing Status Classification System

被引:3
|
作者
Dixon, Peter R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Feeny, David [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Tomlinson, George [2 ,3 ]
Cushing, Sharon L. [7 ]
Chen, Joseph M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, San Diego, CA USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Toronto Hlth Econ & Technol Assessment THETA Coll, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Econ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] Hlth Utilities Incorporated, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Health utility; Health-related quality of life; Hearing loss; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREFERENCE-BASED MEASURES;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000003689
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveRedesign the health status classification system of the Health Utilities Index, Mark 3 (HUI-3) "hearing" attribute to improve its discrimination of hearing-impaired health states.Study DesignDomain and item selection from a previously generated item set guided by a domain and item importance survey, structural independence, and cognitive interviews with patients.SettingTertiary referral center.ParticipantsPatients with a range of hearing loss severities, etiologies, and treatment experiences participated in the domain and item importance survey (n = 108) and hour-long cognitive interviews (n = 10).Main Outcome and Measure(s)Subattributes and levels for the novel Hearing attribute. Domain and item importance was scored on a seven-point Likert scale (1, not at all important; 7, extremely important).ResultsMean domain importance was highest for "speech in noise" (6.21; 95% confidence interval, 5.98-6.43) and lowest for "benefits of hearing loss" (3.46; 95% confidence interval, 3.03-3.89). Domains with moderate or greater (r >= 0.5) domain importance Pearson correlation or construct overlap that interfered with structural independence were combined into single subattributes. Iterative adjustments to instructions, items, and phrasing were guided by cognitive interviews to derive the final instrument with seven subattributes: speech, environmental sounds, localization, listening effort, tinnitus, music, and assistive devices. The novel hearing attribute defines 25,920 unique hearing states.ConclusionThe novel HUI-hearing is part of a comprehensive health utility instrument designed for individuals with hearing loss. Pending derivation of a hearing single attribute utility function and evaluation of measurement properties, our innovative approach could be used to improve health utility measurement for impairments described by any of the other HUI-3 attributes.
引用
收藏
页码:E1069 / E1076
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system - Health Utilities Index Mark 2
    Torrance, GW
    Feeny, DH
    Furlong, WJ
    Barr, RD
    Zhang, YM
    Wang, QN
    MEDICAL CARE, 1996, 34 (07) : 702 - 722
  • [2] Development of a Preference-Weighted Health Status Classification System in France: The Health Utilities Index 3
    Catherine Le Galès
    Catherine Buron
    Nathalie Costet
    Sophia Rosman
    Pr. Gérard Slama
    Health Care Management Science, 2002, 5 (1) : 41 - 51
  • [3] The construct validity of the health utilities index mark 3 in assessing health status in lung transplantation
    Santana, Maria-Jose
    Feeny, David
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Nador, Ronald G.
    Weinkauf, Justin
    Jackson, Kathleen
    Schafenacker, Marianne
    Zuk, Dalyce
    Hubert, Grace
    Lien, Dale
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2010, 8
  • [4] The construct validity of the health utilities index mark 3 in assessing health status in lung transplantation
    Maria-Jose Santana
    David Feeny
    Sunita Ghosh
    Ronald G Nador
    Justin Weinkauf
    Kathleen Jackson
    Marianne Schafenacker
    Dalyce Zuk
    Grace Hubert
    Dale Lien
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8
  • [5] MULTIATTRIBUTE HEALTH-STATUS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS - HEALTH UTILITIES INDEX
    FEENY, D
    FURLONG, W
    BOYLE, M
    TORRANCE, GW
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1995, 7 (06) : 490 - 502
  • [6] The Construct Validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) in Assessing Health Status in Lung Transplantation
    Santana, Maria Jose
    Feeny, David
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Nador, Roland G.
    Weinkauf, Justin
    Jackson, Kathleen
    Lien, Dale
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 58 - 59
  • [7] Validation of two new functional attributes for the health utilities index-mark III (HUI:3) health status classification system (HSCS) in a population of patients with rheumatic diseases.
    Bessette, L
    Kuntz, KM
    Simmons, BP
    Fossel, KK
    Ang, J
    Simmons, O
    Katz, JN
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1997, 40 (09): : 474 - 474
  • [8] Health Status of Hearing Impaired Children and Adolescents
    Kirman, Asli
    Sari, Hatice Yildim
    GUNCEL PEDIATRI-JOURNAL OF CURRENT PEDIATRICS, 2011, 9 (02): : 85 - 92
  • [9] Measuring health status and decline in at-risk seniors residing in the community using the Health Utilities Index Mark 2
    Jenny X. Zhang
    Jennifer D. Walker
    Walter P. Wodchis
    David B. Hogan
    David H. Feeny
    Colleen J. Maxwell
    Quality of Life Research, 2006, 15 : 1415 - 1426
  • [10] Determining Clinically Important Differences in Health Status MeasuresA General Approach with Illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II
    Greg Samsa
    David Edelman
    Margaret L. Rothman
    G. Rhys Williams
    Joseph Lipscomb
    David Matchar
    PharmacoEconomics, 1999, 15 : 141 - 155