Social Market: Combining Explicit and Implicit Social Networks

被引:0
|
作者
Frey, Davide [1 ]
Jegou, Arnaud [1 ]
Kermarrec, Anne-Marie [1 ]
机构
[1] INRIA Rennes Bretagne Atlantique, Rennes, France
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The pervasiveness of the Internet has lead research and applications to focus more and more on their users. Online social networks such as Facebook provide users with the ability to maintain an unprecedented number of social connections. Recommendation systems exploit the opinions of other users to suggest movies or products based on our similarity with them. This shift from machines to users motivates the emergence of novel applications and research challenges. In this paper, we embrace the social aspects of the Web 2.0 by considering a novel problem. We build a distributed social market that combines interest-based social networks with explicit networks like Facebook. Our Social Market (SM) allows users to identify and build connections to other users that can provide interesting goods, or information. At the same time, it backs up these connections with trust, by associating them with paths of trusted users that connect new acquaintances through the explicit network. This convergence of implicit and explicit networks yields TAPS, a novel gossip protocol that can be applied in applications devoted to commercial transactions, or to add robustness to standard gossip applications like dissemination or recommendation systems.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 207
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of Social Anxiety: Social Interaction Predictors of Implicit and Explicit Fear of Negative Evaluation
    Bethany A. Teachman
    Joseph P. Allen
    [J]. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2007, 35
  • [32] Prediction of social behavior in autism spectrum disorders: Explicit versus implicit social cognition
    Keifer, Cara M.
    Mikami, Amori Yee
    Morris, James P.
    Libsack, Erin J.
    Lerner, Matthew D.
    [J]. AUTISM, 2020, 24 (07) : 1758 - 1772
  • [33] In the Presence of Social Threat: Implicit and Explicit Self-Esteem in Social Anxiety Disorder
    Viktoria Ritter
    Christine Ertel
    Katja Beil
    Melanie C. Steffens
    Ulrich Stangier
    [J]. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2013, 37 : 1101 - 1109
  • [34] Self-Evaluations of Social Rank and Affiliation in Social Anxiety: Explicit and Implicit Measures
    Gilboa-Schechtman, Eva
    Friedman, Liron
    Helpman, Liat
    Kananov, Jenny
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE THERAPY, 2013, 6 (03) : 208 - 220
  • [35] Development of social anxiety: Social interaction predictors of implicit and explicit fear of negative evaluation
    Teachman, Bethany A.
    Allen, Joseph P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 35 (01) : 63 - 78
  • [36] In the Presence of Social Threat: Implicit and Explicit Self-Esteem in Social Anxiety Disorder
    Ritter, Viktoria
    Ertel, Christine
    Beil, Katja
    Steffens, Melanie C.
    Stangier, Ulrich
    [J]. COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 2013, 37 (06) : 1101 - 1109
  • [37] Social Recommendation Combining Implicit Information and Rating Bias
    Ying, Weizhi
    Yu, Qing
    Wang, Zuohua
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK IN DESIGN (CSCWD), 2021, : 1087 - 1092
  • [38] Explicit and Implicit Self-Evaluations in Social Anxiety Disorder
    Gilboa-Schechtman, Eva
    Keshet, Hadar
    Livne, Tamar
    Berger, Uri
    Zabag, Reut
    Hermesh, Haggai
    Marom, Sofi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 126 (03) : 285 - 290
  • [39] The Social Connection in Mental Representations of Space: Explicit and Implicit Evidence
    Taylor, Holly A.
    Wang, Qi
    Gagnon, Stephanie A.
    Maddox, Keith B.
    Brunye, Tad T.
    [J]. SPATIAL INFORMATION THEORY, 2011, 6899 : 231 - 244
  • [40] To be or not to be: The impact of implicit versus explicit inappropriate social categorizations on the self
    Barreto, Manuela
    Ellemers, Naomi
    Scholten, Wieke
    Smith, Heather
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 49 (01) : 43 - 67