Nuclear energy policy in the United States 1990-2010: A federal or state responsibility?

被引:7
|
作者
Heffron, Raphael J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Elect Policy Res Grp, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Stirling, Stirling Law Sch, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
关键词
Nuclear new build; Project management; Public administration; CONTRAST EXPLANATION; COURTS; BUILD; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines from a policy perspective nuclear energy policy in the United States (US) from 1990 to 2010 and questions whether it is or has become a Federal or State responsibility. The present study, as befits policy research, engages with many disciplines (for example, in particular, law and politics) and hence the contributions move beyond that of nuclear energy policy literature and in particular to that on nuclear new build and other assessments of large infrastructure projects. Several examples at the Federal level are identified that demonstrate that the nuclear industry has evolved to a stage where it requires a focus on the power of actions at a more localised (state) level in order to re-ignite the industry. The research concludes that there remains a misunderstanding of the issue of project management for complex construction projects, and it is highly arguable whether many of its issues have been resolved. Further, the research asserts that the economics of nuclear energy are not the most influential reason for no nuclear new build in the US. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 266
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The heterogeneity and change in the urban structure of metropolitan areas in the United States. 1990-2010
    Leyk, Stefan
    Balk, Deborah
    Jones, Bryan
    Montgomery, Mark R.
    Engin, Hasim
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2019, 6 (1)
  • [22] The Impact of China's Changing Energy Strategy to its Foreign Policy (1990-2010)
    Karaca, R. Kutay
    [J]. ULUSLARARASI ILISKILER-INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2012, 9 (33): : 93 - 118
  • [23] Depression Screening and Treatment Among Nonpregnant Women of Reproductive Age in the United States, 1990-2010
    Farr, Sherry L.
    Dietz, Patricia M.
    Williams, Jessica R.
    Gibbs, Falicia A.
    Tregear, Stephen
    [J]. PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2011, 8 (06):
  • [24] Analysis of Trends in United States National Science Foundation Funding for Engineering Education: 1990-2010
    Borrego, Maura
    Olds, Barbara
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION SYMPOSIUM, 2011, : 175 - 183
  • [25] United States energy policy during the 1990s
    Joskow, PL
    [J]. CURRENT HISTORY, 2002, 101 (653): : 105 - 125
  • [26] Understanding urbanization: A study of census and satellite-derived urban classes in the United States, 1990-2010
    Balk, Deborah
    Leyk, Stefan
    Jones, Bryan
    Montgomery, Mark R.
    Clark, Anastasia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [27] Socioeconomic Stratification from Within: Changes Within American Indian Cohorts in the United States: 1990-2010
    Glick, Jennifer E.
    Han, Seung Yong
    [J]. POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW, 2015, 34 (01) : 77 - 112
  • [28] Citizenship Education and Liberalism: A State of the Debate Analysis 1990-2010
    Fernandez, Christian
    Sundstrom, Mikael
    [J]. STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION, 2011, 30 (04) : 363 - 384
  • [29] Golden state uprising: migrant protest in California, 1990-2010
    Paret, Marcel
    Aguilera, Guadalupe
    [J]. CITIZENSHIP STUDIES, 2016, 20 (3-4) : 359 - 378
  • [30] Health policy in the concertacion era (1990-2010): Reforms the chilean way
    Martinez-Gutierrez, Maria Soledad
    Cuadrado, Cristobal
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 182 : 117 - 126