Planning dredging services in contaminated sediments for balanced environmental and investment costs

被引:49
|
作者
Wasserman, Julio Cesar [1 ]
Barros, Sergio Ricardo [2 ,3 ]
Alves Lima, Gilson Brito [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Fluminense, Network Environm & Sustainable Dev REMADS UFF, BR-24210240 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Fluminense, Postgrad Program Syst Management LATEC UFF, BR-24210240 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[3] Fundacao Estudos Mar FEMAR, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Fluminense, Dept Prod Engn, BR-24210240 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Heavy metals; Mapping; Dredging; Environmental impact assessment; Sepetiba Bay; Brazil; SEPETIBA BAY; SE BRAZIL; MARINE-SEDIMENTS; SULFIDE MINERALS; TRACE-METALS; MERCURY; HARBOR; SANTOS; SYSTEM; LAGOON;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Dredging of contaminated sediments has shown to be a harmful activity for the environment, because a number of contaminants can be resuspended and become available to the organisms. Furthermore, dredged contaminated sediments may cause significant damages in the dumping site. In order to avoid the drawbacks of this activity, better techniques have to be developed and the present article presents a new procedure for the planning of dredging that reduces the environmental impacts by reducing the amount of dredged sediments and, at the same time, reduces costs. The new technique uses screening of contaminant concentrations in the sediments that are normally part of the environmental impact assessment for dredging activity. A detailed mapping of the contamination, layer by layer is carried out and the areas where the action levels are reached are outlined with polygons, establishing limits within which sediments have to be dredged with safe procedures. In the case presented, construction of a harbor in Sepetiba Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, the safe procedure is cutter/suction dredging and pumping into a sub-aquatic confined disposal facility (CDF). A detailed evaluation of costs showed that if the whole layers of sediment were to be dumped into the CDF, the cost of the activity would be at least 63.82% more expensive than the proposed procedure, constituting an attractive advantage. Furthermore, as the size of the CDF is significantly smaller, less dredging is necessary, causing smaller environmental impact. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 56
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SUSTAINABILITY BALANCED SCORECARD ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTMENT DECISION-MAKING
    Jassem, Suaad
    Zakaria, Zarina
    Che Azmi, Anna
    FOUNDATIONS OF MANAGEMENT, 2020, 12 (01) : 193 - 210
  • [42] Investment planning in energy considering economic and environmental objectives
    Flores, Julio
    Montagna, Jorge M.
    Vecchietti, Aldo
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 72 : 222 - 232
  • [43] Partitioning of trace elements in contaminated estuarine sediments: The role of environmental settings
    Shaike, Mohmmad M.
    Nath, Bibhash
    Birch, Gavin F.
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2014, 110 : 246 - 253
  • [44] Amendments for the in situ remediation of contaminated sediments: Evaluation of potential environmental impacts
    Paller, Michael H.
    Knox, Anna S.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 408 (20) : 4894 - 4900
  • [45] ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL-ANALYSIS AND APPRAISAL OF METAL-CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS
    FORSTNER, U
    CHEMIKER-ZEITUNG, 1981, 105 (06): : 165 - 174
  • [46] Preliminary environmental assessment of metal-contaminated sediment dredging in an Urban River, New Jersey, USA
    Soetan, Oluwafemi
    Nie, Jing
    Feng, Huan
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2022, 184
  • [47] DG Investment Planning Analysis with Renewable Integration and Considering Emission Costs
    Zahlay, Desta
    Santos, Fitiwi Sergio F.
    Bizuayehu, Abebe W.
    Shafie-khah, Miadreza
    Catalao, Joao P. S.
    Asensio, Miguel
    Contreras, Javier
    IEEE EUROCON 2015 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AS A TOOL (EUROCON), 2015, : 618 - 623
  • [48] Peak shaving: a planning alternative to reduce investment costs in distribution systems?
    Martin, Benoit
    Feron, Baptiste
    De Jaeger, Emmanuel
    Glineur, Francois
    Monti, Antonello
    ENERGY SYSTEMS-OPTIMIZATION MODELING SIMULATION AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS, 2019, 10 (04): : 871 - 887
  • [49] Peak shaving: a planning alternative to reduce investment costs in distribution systems?
    Benoit Martin
    Baptiste Feron
    Emmanuel De Jaeger
    Francois Glineur
    Antonello Monti
    Energy Systems, 2019, 10 : 871 - 887
  • [50] Dredging-induced re-suspension of sediments and consequent air emissions from contaminated sediment dredged materials
    Valsaraj, KT
    Ravikrishna, R
    Thibodeaux, L
    Price, C
    Brannon, JM
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 225 : U840 - U840