The Penn Shoulder Score: Reliability and validity

被引:212
|
作者
Leggin, BG
Michener, LA
Shaffer, MA
Brenneman, SK
Iannotti, JP
Williams, GR
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Ctr Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Coll Med, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Arcadia Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Glenside, PA USA
[5] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Orthopaed, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Hlth Syst, Dept Orthopaed, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
关键词
outcome assessment; psychometrics; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.2006.36.3.138
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Psychometric evaluation of a cross-sectional survey. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of reliability and validity of the Penn Shoulder Score (PSS). Background: Shoulder outcome measures are used to assess patient self-report levels of pain, satisfaction, and function. The PSS is a 100-point shoulder-specific self-report questionnaire consisting of 3 subscales of pain, satisfaction, and function. This scale has been utilized in the literature. However, the measurement properties of reliability and validity, including responsiveness, of the PSS subscales and overall scale need to be established. Methods and Measures: Patients (n = 40) with shoulder disorders undergoing a course of outpatient physical therapy completed the PSS at initial visit and again within 72 hours to assess test-retest reliability. The Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES) were also completed at the initial visit and compared to the PSS to assess convergent construct validity. A separate cohort of patients (n = 109) completed the PSS at initial visit and 4 weeks later. These scores were used to assess internal consistency and responsiveness. Results: Reliability analysis revealed a test-retest IC2,1 of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97). Internal consistency analysis revealed a Cronbach alpha of 0.93. The standard error of measurement (SEM) was 8.5 scale points (based on a 90% CI) and the minimal detectable change (MDC) was 12.1 scale points (based on a 90% CI). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for improvement was 11.4 points. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients between the PSS and the CSS and ASES were 0.85 and 0.87, respectively. Responsiveness analysis revealed an effect size of 1.01 and a standardized response mean of 1.27. Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that the PSS is a reliable and valid measure for reporting outcome of patients with various shoulder disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 151
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability and validity of a return to sports testing battery for the shoulder
    Popchak, Adam
    Poploski, Kathleen
    Patterson-Lynch, Brittany
    Nigolian, Jacob
    Lin, Albert
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2021, 48 : 1 - 11
  • [32] Reliability and validity of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in a sample of patients with frozen shoulder
    Venturin, Davide
    Giannotta, Gabriele
    Pellicciari, Leonardo
    Rossi, Alex
    Pennella, Denis
    Goffredo, Michela
    Poser, Antonio
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [33] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire in patients with shoulder pain
    Ciftci, Betul
    Uzunkulaoglu, Aslihan
    Topcu, Deniz Oke
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2021, 55 (03) : 208 - 212
  • [34] Reliability and validity of the Greek shoulder pain and disability index in patients with shoulder pain
    Spanou, Alexia
    Mamais, Ioannis
    Lamnisos, Dimitrios
    Stasinopoulos, Dimitrios
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (09) : 1299 - 1304
  • [35] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of LHB Score
    Najafov, Elshan
    Ozal, Seyda
    Kaptan, Ahmet Yigit
    Ulucakoy, Coskun
    Kanatli, Ulunay
    Ataoglu, Baybars
    Basar, Selda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2021, 30 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [36] The Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Worry Domains Questionnaire: structure, reliability and validity
    van Rijsoort, S
    Emmelkamp, P
    Vervaeke, G
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 1999, 6 (04) : 297 - 307
  • [37] THE STUDY OF FACTORIAL STRUCTURE, VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE PENN STATE WORRY QUESTIONNAIRE (PSWQ)
    Salarifar, M. H.
    Pouretemad, H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 27
  • [38] A RELIABILITY STUDY OF THE ASES SCORE AND OXFORD SCORE IN PATIENTS AFFECTED BY SHOULDER DISEASES
    Gastaldo, C.
    Fissore, L.
    Gennari, E.
    Pellegrino, P.
    Castoldi, F.
    Blonna, D.
    [J]. MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2012, 63 (03) : 169 - 176
  • [39] Shoulder Performance Activity Test (SPAT) for People With Shoulder Pain: Feasibility, Reliability and Validity
    Sousa, Catarina O.
    Nascimento, Jose Diego S.
    Pozzi, Federico
    Kardouni, Joseph R.
    Michener, Lori A.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2023, 103 (03):
  • [40] Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Korean Version of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire and Shoulder Rating Questionnaire
    Choi, Yuseong
    Park, Jong Wook
    Noh, Sujin
    Kim, Min Su
    Park, Yun Hee
    Sung, Duk Hyun
    [J]. ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2015, 39 (05): : 705 - 717