The Penn Shoulder Score: Reliability and validity

被引:212
|
作者
Leggin, BG
Michener, LA
Shaffer, MA
Brenneman, SK
Iannotti, JP
Williams, GR
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Ctr Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Coll Med, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Arcadia Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Glenside, PA USA
[5] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Orthopaed, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Hlth Syst, Dept Orthopaed, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
关键词
outcome assessment; psychometrics; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.2006.36.3.138
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Psychometric evaluation of a cross-sectional survey. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of reliability and validity of the Penn Shoulder Score (PSS). Background: Shoulder outcome measures are used to assess patient self-report levels of pain, satisfaction, and function. The PSS is a 100-point shoulder-specific self-report questionnaire consisting of 3 subscales of pain, satisfaction, and function. This scale has been utilized in the literature. However, the measurement properties of reliability and validity, including responsiveness, of the PSS subscales and overall scale need to be established. Methods and Measures: Patients (n = 40) with shoulder disorders undergoing a course of outpatient physical therapy completed the PSS at initial visit and again within 72 hours to assess test-retest reliability. The Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES) were also completed at the initial visit and compared to the PSS to assess convergent construct validity. A separate cohort of patients (n = 109) completed the PSS at initial visit and 4 weeks later. These scores were used to assess internal consistency and responsiveness. Results: Reliability analysis revealed a test-retest IC2,1 of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97). Internal consistency analysis revealed a Cronbach alpha of 0.93. The standard error of measurement (SEM) was 8.5 scale points (based on a 90% CI) and the minimal detectable change (MDC) was 12.1 scale points (based on a 90% CI). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for improvement was 11.4 points. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients between the PSS and the CSS and ASES were 0.85 and 0.87, respectively. Responsiveness analysis revealed an effect size of 1.01 and a standardized response mean of 1.27. Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that the PSS is a reliable and valid measure for reporting outcome of patients with various shoulder disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 151
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Translation, cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Penn Shoulder Score
    Kanik, Zeynep Hazar
    Gunaydin, Gurkan
    Pala, Omer Osman
    Sozlu, Ugur
    Alkan, Zeynep Beyza
    Citaker, Seyit
    Basar, Selda
    Kanatli, Ulunay
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 40 (10) : 1214 - 1219
  • [2] Measurement Properties of the Brazilian Version of the Penn Shoulder Score (PSS-Brazil): Reliability; Validity, and Responsiveness
    de Souza, Marcela Bembo
    Martins, Jaqueline
    Hotta, Gisele Harumi
    de Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2015, 45 (02): : 137 - 142
  • [3] Preliminary reliability and validity of the shoulder functional reach score
    Riley, Sean P.
    Tafuto, Vincent
    Cote, Mark
    Brismee, Jean-Michel
    Wright, Alexis
    Cook, Chad
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 23 (04)
  • [4] The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the oxford shoulder instability score
    Sonmezer, Emel
    Yosmaoglu, Hayri Baran
    Dogan, Celal Deha
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (02) : 261 - 266
  • [5] Validity and reliability of the SPORTS score
    Blonna, Davide
    Castoldi, Filippo
    Delicio, Davide
    Bruzzone, Matteo
    Dettoni, Federico
    Bonasia, Davide Edoardo
    Rossi, Roberto
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2012, 20 (02) : 356 - 360
  • [6] Reliability and validity of a steadiness score
    Clark, DO
    Callahan, CM
    Counsell, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2005, 53 (09) : 1582 - 1586
  • [7] Validity and reliability of the SPORTS score
    Davide Blonna
    Filippo Castoldi
    Davide Delicio
    Matteo Bruzzone
    Federico Dettoni
    Davide Edoardo Bonasia
    Roberto Rossi
    [J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2012, 20 : 356 - 360
  • [8] Reliability and validity of a steadiness score
    Clark, DO
    Callahan, CM
    Counsell, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 : 58 - 58
  • [9] The Danish Version of the Modified Constant-Murley Shoulder Score: Reliability, Agreement, and Construct Validity
    Moeller, Anders D.
    Thorsen, Rikke R.
    Torabi, Tina P.
    Bjoerkman, Anne-Sofe D.
    Christensen, Elsebeth H.
    Maribo, Thomas
    Christiansen, David H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 44 (05): : 336 - 340
  • [10] Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom score
    Lechien, Jerome R.
    Bobin, Francois
    Muls, Vinciane
    Thill, Marie-Paule
    Horoi, Mihaela
    Ostermann, Katharina
    Huet, Kathy
    Harmegnies, Bernard
    Dequanter, Didier
    Dapri, Giovanni
    Marechal, Marie-Therese
    Finck, Camille
    Rodriguez Ruiz, Alexandra
    Saussez, Sven
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2020, 130 (03): : E98 - E107