Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size.

被引:134
|
作者
Liberman, L [1 ]
Mason, G [1 ]
Morris, EA [1 ]
Dershaw, DD [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Breast Imaging Sect, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
breast; breast cancer; breast imaging; MRI; oncologic imaging;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.04.1707
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of lesion size on the positive predictive value (PPV) of biopsy in MRI-detected breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review was performed of 666 consecutive nonpalpable, mammographically occult lesions that had MRI-guided localization. MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5-T magnet. Lesions were measured by the interpreting radiologist before biopsy. Malignancy rate versus lesion size was determined. RESULTS. The median MRI lesion size was I cm (range, 0.3-7.0 cm). Malignancy was present in 149/666 (22%) lesions, of which 80 (54%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 66 (44%) were invasive cancer, and three (2%) were lymphoma. The frequency of malignancy increased significantly (p = 0.0005) with lesion size, with malignancy found in one (3%) of 37 lesions less than 5 mm, 44 (17%) of 254 lesions 5-9 mm, 37 (25%) of 151 lesions 10-14 mm, 21 (28%) of 74 lesions 15-19 mm, and 46 (31%) of 150 lesions 20 mm or larger. Lesions less than 5 mm accounted for 37 (6%) of 666 lesions that had a biopsy and one (< 1%) of 149 cancers (one DCIS). Among lesions less than 10 mm, the likelihood of malignancy was highest in postmenopausal women (22% malignant) and in the extent of disease setting (22% malignant), and lowest in premenopausal women (10% malignant) and in the high-risk screening setting (10% malignant). CONCLUSION. The PPV of biopsy for lesions identified at breast MRI using a 1.5-T magnet significantly increased with increasing lesion size. Biopsy is rarely necessary for lesions smaller than 5 mm because of their low (3%) likelihood of cancer. Further work is needed to develop an algorithm that uses size in addition to other patient and lesion factors to guide biopsy recommendations for MRI-detected breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 430
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Positive predictive value of 99mTc sestamibi scintimammography in patients with non-palpable, mammographically detected, suspicious, breast lesions
    Lumachi, F
    Zucchetta, P
    Marzola, MC
    Ferretti, G
    Povolato, M
    Paris, MK
    Brandes, AA
    Bui, F
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, 23 (11) : 1073 - 1078
  • [22] Does size matter? Comparison study between MRI, gross, and microscopic tumor sizes in breast cancer in lumpectomy specimens
    Behjatnia, Bita
    Sim, Julie
    Bassett, Lawrence W.
    Moatamed, Neda A.
    Apple, Sophia K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 3 (03): : 303 - 309
  • [23] The role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions detected by multiparametric MRI of the prostate.
    Kilic, Mert
    Koseoglu, Ersin
    Madendere, Serdar
    Vural, Metin
    Balbay, Mevlana Derya
    Esen, Tarik
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41
  • [24] Size doesn't matter: predictive value of new quantitative analysis for differential diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism lesions vs. thyroid nodular disease in parathyroid scintigraphy
    Markovic, A. V. Koljevic
    Jankovic, M.
    Pupic, G.
    Dzodic, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 : S64 - S65
  • [25] Correlation of sentinel node localization using blue dye and radiocolloid methods in T1 & T2 breast cancer (CA BR) with histopathological findings:: Assessing accuracy and negative predictive value (NPV) according to tumor size.
    Jana, S
    Axelrod, D
    Siegel, B
    Santiago, JF
    Mills, C
    Heiba, S
    Salem, S
    Wallack, MK
    Sethi, Y
    Luo, J
    Abdel-Dayem, HM
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2000, 41 (05) : 281P - 281P
  • [26] Re: "Behjatnia B et al. "Does size matter? Comparison study between MRI, gross, and microscopic tumor sizes in breast cancer in lumpectomy specimens". Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2010;3(3):303-309".
    Parkash, Vinita
    Domfeh, Akosua
    Cohen, Paul
    Fadare, Oluwole
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 3 (04): : 458 - 460