The Co-production of Science, Ethics, and Emotion

被引:59
|
作者
Pickersgill, Martyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Med, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
academic disciplines and traditions; ethics; labor; emotion; power; governance; law; WORK; NEUROSCIENCE; BIOETHICS; ECONOMY; ISSUES; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1177/0162243911433057
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
The concept of "ethical research" holds considerable sway over the ways in which contemporary biomedical, natural, and social science investigations are funded, regulated, and practiced within a variety of countries. Some commentators have viewed this "new" means of governance positively; others, however, have been resoundingly critical, regarding it as restrictive and ethics bodies and regulations unfit for the task they have been set (or have set themselves). Regardless, it is clear that science today is an "ethical" business. The ways in which formal and informal ethical discourses and practices-what might be called "regimes of normativity"a"structure scientific work and the meanings it is ascribed with have, however, been underexplored. This article attends to how science and ethics articulate; how they are, in many ways, co-produced. Exploring these processes of co-production casts into sharp relief the essential emotionality of science; the relationships investigators have with their colleagues, work, and research participants pulse with emotion, potentially shaping in important ways the very kinds of knowledge that laboratories produce.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:579 / 603
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Greening Berlin: The Co-Production of Science, Politics, and Urban Nature
    Ernstson, Henrik
    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES, 2014, 27 (01): : 113 - 116
  • [22] WHAT IS CO-PRODUCTION?
    Steadman, L.
    Dodgson, S.
    Taylor-Rose, A.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2022, 28 : 15 - 15
  • [23] A case for co-production
    Vikram, Anvita
    Siniscalchi, Madeleine
    Banerji, Anita
    PSYCHOLOGIST, 2022, 35 : 4 - 4
  • [24] Co-production and engagement of people with dementia: The issue of ethics and creative or intellectual copyright
    Swaffer, Kate
    DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 15 (06): : 1319 - 1325
  • [25] Entangled security: Science, co-production, and intra-active insecurity
    Elbe, Stefan
    Buckland-Merrett, Gemma
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, 2019, 4 (02) : 123 - 141
  • [26] The co-production of science and waterscapes: The case of the Seine and the Rhone Rivers, France
    Bouleau, Gabrielle
    GEOFORUM, 2014, 57 : 248 - 257
  • [27] Co-production: what makes co-production work? Evidence from Pakistan
    Farooqi, Seemab Ara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2016, 29 (04) : 381 - 395
  • [28] CENTERING KNOWLEDGE CO-PRODUCTION IN SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE WHY, HOW, AND WHEN
    Satterthwaite, Erin, V
    Mcquain, Liz
    Almada, Amalia A.
    Rudnick, Jessica M.
    Eberhardt, Alyson L.
    Doerr, Angee N.
    O'Connor, Ryan J.
    Wright, Nicole
    Briggs, Rebecca A.
    Robbins, Matthew J.
    Bastidas, Carolina
    Sparks, Eric L.
    Goodrich, Kristen A.
    Costello, Wells J.
    OCEANOGRAPHY, 2024, 37 (01) : 26 - 37
  • [29] Baltic Sea Action Plan process: co-production of science and policy
    Aps, R.
    Martin, G.
    Roots, O.
    MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ECOLOGICAL HAZARDS II, 2010, 127 : 187 - 198
  • [30] Living labs and co-production: university campuses as platforms for sustainability science
    Evans, James
    Jones, Ross
    Karvonen, Andrew
    Millard, Lucy
    Wendler, Jana
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 16 : 1 - 6