Ultra-low doses of rituximab for continued treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (REDO study): a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

被引:30
|
作者
Verhoeff, Lise M. [1 ]
den Broeder, Nathan [1 ]
Thurlings, Rogier M. [2 ]
van der Laan, Willemijn H. [1 ]
van der Weele, Wilfred [4 ]
Kok, Marc R. [5 ]
Moens, Hein J. Bernelot [6 ]
Woodworth, Thasia G. [7 ]
van den Bemt, Bart J. F. [1 ,3 ]
van den Hoogen, Frank H. J. [1 ,2 ]
den Broeder, Alfons A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sint Maartensklin, Dept Rheumatol, POB 9011, NL-6500 GM Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboudumc, Dept Rheumat Dis, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboudumc, Dept Pharm, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Reade, Dept Rheumatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Maasstad Hosp, Dept Rheumatol & Clin Immunol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Ziekenhuisgrp Twente, Dept Rheumatol, Almelo, Netherlands
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Rheumatol, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY | 2019年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; DISEASE-ACTIVITY; EFFICACY; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; REMISSION; DEPLETION; VALIDITY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30066-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Rituximab is an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, given as either two doses of 1000 mg (2 weeks apart) every 6 months (the dose recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency) or two doses of 500 mg (2 weeks apart) or one dose of 1000 mg (a standard low dose) every 6 months. Findings of several small uncontrolled studies suggest that doses lower than the recommended dose or standard low dose might be sufficient for maintenance treatment, potentially improving safety and reducing costs. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy of ultra-low doses of rituximab (one dose of 500 mg or 200 mg) with a standard low dose of rituximab (one dose of 1000 mg) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who respond to standard doses of rituximab. Methods The REDO study is a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial done at five centres in the Netherlands. Adults (aged >= 18 years) with rheumatoid arthritis responding well to rituximab were randomly allocated (1:2:2) to receive intravenous rituximab as one dose of either 1000 mg, 500 mg, or 200 mg, respectively. Volumes of all doses were equal to achieve masking. Randomisation lists were computer-generated and stratified by rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody status (positive or negative) and concomitant use of conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (yes or no). The primary analysis was a per-protocol hierarchical testing procedure comparing ultra-low doses with a standard low dose (500 mg vs 1000 mg at 3 months, followed by 500 mg vs 1000 mg at 6 months, 200 mg vs 1000 mg at 3 months, and 200 mg vs 1000 mg at 6 months), using a non-inferiority margin of 0.60 on change from baseline in the 28-joint disease activity score based on C-reactive protein levels (DAS28-CRP). The study is registered at www.trialregister.nl , NTR6117. Findings Between Dec 15,2016, and Sept 20,2018,142 patients were randomly allocated to either 1000 mg rituximab (n=29), 500 mg rituximab (n=58), or 200 mg rituximab (n=55). The 500 mg dose was non-inferior to 1000 mg at 3 months (mean change from baseline in DAS28-CRP, -0.07, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.27) but not at 6 months (0.29, -0.08 to 0.65). Because of the hierarchical testing procedure, non-inferiority could not be tested for the 200 mg dose. 13 patients had serious adverse events, three (10%) in the 1000 mg group, six (10%) in the 500 mg group, and four (7%) in the 200 mg group. The most frequently reported serious adverse events were cardiovascular. No deaths occurred during the study. A significantly lower incidence of infections was seen in the ultra-low-dose groups compared with the standard dose group (1.24 infections per patient-year with the 1000 mg dose vs 0.52 per patient-year with the 500 mg dose and 0.55 per patient-year with the 200 mg dose; rate ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0-83; p=0.013 for 500 mg vs 1000 mg; 0-44,0-22-0. 88; p=0.019 for 200 mg vs 1000 mg). Interpretation Our study did not show non-inferiority of ultra-low doses of rittudinab for continued treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Nonetheless, in clinical practice, a strategy with an ultra-low dose of rituximab might be considered after evaluation of risks and benefits, although further studies are needed to establish non-inferiority. Further analyses and a 2-year observational extension are ongoing and should provide further insight into efficacy and safety. Copyright (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E145 / E153
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Delayed versus immediate treatment for patients with acute hepatitis C: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
    Deterding, Katja
    Gruner, Norbert
    Buggisch, Peter
    Wiegand, Johannes
    Gale, Peter R.
    Spengler, Ulrich
    Hinrichsen, Holger
    Berg, Thomas
    Potthoff, Andrej
    Malek, Nisar
    Groshennig, Anika
    Koch, Armin
    Diepolder, Helmut
    Luth, Stefan
    Feyerabend, Sandra
    Jung, Maria Christina
    Rogalska-Taranta, Magdalena
    Schlaphoff, Verena
    Comberg, Markus
    Manns, Michael P.
    Wedemeyer, Heiner
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 13 (06): : 497 - 506
  • [22] Pessary or cerclage (PC study) to prevent recurrent preterm birth: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial
    van Gils, Annabelle L.
    van Dijk, Charlotte E.
    Koullali, Bouchra
    Lugthart, Malou A.
    Bet, Bo B.
    van Zijl, Maud D.
    van der Weide, Marijke C.
    Knol, H. Marieke
    de Tejada, Begona Martinez
    Gordijn, Sanne J.
    van den Akker, Eline S. A.
    Sueters, Marieke
    de Boer, Marjon A.
    Hermsen, Brenda B. J.
    de Mooij, Yolanda M.
    de Weerd, Sabina
    van Baal, Wilhelmina M.
    van Hoorn, Marion E.
    Oudijk, Martijn A.
    Kazemier, Brenda M.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Pajkrt, Eva
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2024, 78
  • [23] Glucocorticoids for acute urticaria: study protocol for a double-blind non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
    Javaud, Nicolas
    Soria, Angele
    Maignan, Maxime
    Martin, Ludovic
    Descamps, Vincent
    Fain, Olivier
    Bouillet, Laurence
    Berard, Frederic
    Tazarourte, Karim
    Roy, Pierre-Marie
    Fontaine, Jean-Paul
    Bagot, Martine
    Khellaf, Mehdi
    Goulet, Helene
    Lapostolle, Frederic
    Casalino, Enrique
    Doutre, Marie-Sylvie
    Gil-Jardine, Cedric
    Caux, Frederic
    Chosidow, Olivier
    Pateron, Dominique
    Vicaut, Eric
    Adnet, Frederic
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [24] A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial
    Heijnen, Esther M. E. W.
    Eijkemans, Marinus J. C.
    De Klerk, Cora
    Polinder, Suzanne
    Beckers, Nicole G. M.
    Klinkert, Ellen R.
    Broekmans, Frank J.
    Passchier, Jan
    Macklon, Nick S.
    Fauser, Bart C. J. M.
    LANCET, 2007, 369 (9563): : 743 - 749
  • [25] Physiotherapy in the decongestive Treatment of Lymphoedema: A randomized controlled Trial of Non-inferiority
    Forner-Cordero, Isabel
    JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2025, 23
  • [26] Full endoscopic versus open discectomy for sciatica: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
    Gadjradj, Pravesh S.
    Rubinstein, Sidney M.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    Depauw, Paul R.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L.
    Seiger, Ankie
    Susante, Job L. C.
    de Boer, Michiel R.
    van Tulder, Maurits W.
    Harhangi, Biswadjiet S.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 376
  • [27] Clomiphene citrate versus high doses of gonadotropins for in vitrofertilisation in women with compromised ovarian reserve: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
    Guido Ragni
    Paolo E Levi-Setti
    Rubens Fadini
    Claudio Brigante
    Claudia Scarduelli
    Federica Alagna
    Veronica Arfuso
    Mario Mignini-Renzini
    Massimo Candiani
    Alessio Paffoni
    Edgardo Somigliana
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 10
  • [28] Telephone administered cognitive behaviour therapy for treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
    Lovell, Karina
    Cox, Debbie
    Haddock, Gillian
    Jones, Christopher
    Raines, David
    Garvey, Rachel
    Roberts, Clrris
    Hadley, Sarah
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7574): : 883 - 886
  • [29] Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
    Echevarria, Carlos
    Gray, Joanne
    Hartley, Tom
    Steer, John
    Miller, Jonathan
    Simpson, A. John
    Gibson, G. John
    Bourke, Stephen C.
    THORAX, 2018, 73 (08) : 713 - 722
  • [30] Posaconazole versus voriconazole for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis: a phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial
    Maertens, Johan A.
    Rahav, Galia
    Lee, Dong-Gun
    Ponce-de-Leon, Alfredo
    Ramirez Sanchez, Isabel Cristina
    Klimko, Nikolay
    Sonet, Anne
    Haider, Shariq
    Diego Velez, Juan
    Raad, Issam
    Koh, Liang-Piu
    Karthaus, Meinolf
    Zhou, Jianying
    Ben-Ami, Ronen
    Motyl, Mary R.
    Han, Seongah
    Grandhi, Anjana
    Waskin, Hetty
    LANCET, 2021, 397 (10273): : 499 - 509