Ultra-low doses of rituximab for continued treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (REDO study): a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

被引:30
|
作者
Verhoeff, Lise M. [1 ]
den Broeder, Nathan [1 ]
Thurlings, Rogier M. [2 ]
van der Laan, Willemijn H. [1 ]
van der Weele, Wilfred [4 ]
Kok, Marc R. [5 ]
Moens, Hein J. Bernelot [6 ]
Woodworth, Thasia G. [7 ]
van den Bemt, Bart J. F. [1 ,3 ]
van den Hoogen, Frank H. J. [1 ,2 ]
den Broeder, Alfons A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sint Maartensklin, Dept Rheumatol, POB 9011, NL-6500 GM Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboudumc, Dept Rheumat Dis, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboudumc, Dept Pharm, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Reade, Dept Rheumatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Maasstad Hosp, Dept Rheumatol & Clin Immunol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Ziekenhuisgrp Twente, Dept Rheumatol, Almelo, Netherlands
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Rheumatol, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY | 2019年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; DISEASE-ACTIVITY; EFFICACY; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; REMISSION; DEPLETION; VALIDITY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30066-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Rituximab is an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, given as either two doses of 1000 mg (2 weeks apart) every 6 months (the dose recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency) or two doses of 500 mg (2 weeks apart) or one dose of 1000 mg (a standard low dose) every 6 months. Findings of several small uncontrolled studies suggest that doses lower than the recommended dose or standard low dose might be sufficient for maintenance treatment, potentially improving safety and reducing costs. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy of ultra-low doses of rituximab (one dose of 500 mg or 200 mg) with a standard low dose of rituximab (one dose of 1000 mg) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who respond to standard doses of rituximab. Methods The REDO study is a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial done at five centres in the Netherlands. Adults (aged >= 18 years) with rheumatoid arthritis responding well to rituximab were randomly allocated (1:2:2) to receive intravenous rituximab as one dose of either 1000 mg, 500 mg, or 200 mg, respectively. Volumes of all doses were equal to achieve masking. Randomisation lists were computer-generated and stratified by rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody status (positive or negative) and concomitant use of conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (yes or no). The primary analysis was a per-protocol hierarchical testing procedure comparing ultra-low doses with a standard low dose (500 mg vs 1000 mg at 3 months, followed by 500 mg vs 1000 mg at 6 months, 200 mg vs 1000 mg at 3 months, and 200 mg vs 1000 mg at 6 months), using a non-inferiority margin of 0.60 on change from baseline in the 28-joint disease activity score based on C-reactive protein levels (DAS28-CRP). The study is registered at www.trialregister.nl , NTR6117. Findings Between Dec 15,2016, and Sept 20,2018,142 patients were randomly allocated to either 1000 mg rituximab (n=29), 500 mg rituximab (n=58), or 200 mg rituximab (n=55). The 500 mg dose was non-inferior to 1000 mg at 3 months (mean change from baseline in DAS28-CRP, -0.07, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.27) but not at 6 months (0.29, -0.08 to 0.65). Because of the hierarchical testing procedure, non-inferiority could not be tested for the 200 mg dose. 13 patients had serious adverse events, three (10%) in the 1000 mg group, six (10%) in the 500 mg group, and four (7%) in the 200 mg group. The most frequently reported serious adverse events were cardiovascular. No deaths occurred during the study. A significantly lower incidence of infections was seen in the ultra-low-dose groups compared with the standard dose group (1.24 infections per patient-year with the 1000 mg dose vs 0.52 per patient-year with the 500 mg dose and 0.55 per patient-year with the 200 mg dose; rate ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0-83; p=0.013 for 500 mg vs 1000 mg; 0-44,0-22-0. 88; p=0.019 for 200 mg vs 1000 mg). Interpretation Our study did not show non-inferiority of ultra-low doses of rittudinab for continued treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Nonetheless, in clinical practice, a strategy with an ultra-low dose of rituximab might be considered after evaluation of risks and benefits, although further studies are needed to establish non-inferiority. Further analyses and a 2-year observational extension are ongoing and should provide further insight into efficacy and safety. Copyright (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E145 / E153
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultra-low doses of rituximab for continued treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (REDO study): a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (vol 1, pg 145, 2019)
    Verhoef, L. M.
    Den Broeder, N.
    Thurlings, R. M.
    LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 3 (10): : E687 - E687
  • [2] ULTRA-LOW DOSES OF RITUXIMAB OR RETREATMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED NON-INFERIORITY TRIAL
    Verhoef, L. M.
    den Broeder, Nathan
    Thurlings, R. M.
    van der Laan, W. H.
    van der Weele, W.
    Kok, Marc
    Moens, H. J. Bernelot
    Woodworth, Thasia
    van den Bemt, Bart
    van den Hoogen, Frank
    den Broeder, Alfons
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2019, 78 : 264 - 265
  • [3] Ultra-Low Doses of Rituximab for Retreatment of RA: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial
    Verhoef, Lise
    den Broeder, Nathan
    Thurlings, Rogier
    van der Laan, Willemijn
    van der Weele, Wilfred
    Kok, Marc
    Moens, Hein Bernelot
    Woodworth, Thasia
    van den Bemt, Bart
    van den Hoogen, Frank
    den Broeder, Alfons
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 71
  • [4] Ultra-low dose of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Alfons A. den Broeder
    Lise M. Verhoef
    Jaap Fransen
    Rogier Thurlings
    Bart J. F. van den Bemt
    Steven Teerenstra
    Nadine Boers
    Nathan den Broeder
    Frank H. J. van den Hoogen
    Trials, 18
  • [5] Ultra-low dose of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    den Broeder, Alfons A.
    Verhoef, Lise M.
    Fransen, Jaap
    Thurlings, Rogier
    van den Bemt, Bart J. F.
    Teerenstra, Steven
    Boers, Nadine
    den Broeder, Nathan
    van den Hoogen, Frank H. J.
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [6] Evaluation of low-dose rituximab for the retreatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
    Mariette, Xavier
    Rouanet, Stephanie
    Sibilia, Jean
    Combe, Bernard
    Le Loet, Xavier
    Tebib, Jacques
    Jourdan, Rosemary
    Dougados, Maxime
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2014, 73 (08) : 1508 - 1514
  • [7] Long-term Effectiveness of Ultra-Low Doses of Rituximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    den Broeder, Nathan
    Verhoef, Lise
    De Man, Yael
    Kok, Marc
    Thurlings, Rogier
    van der Weele, Wilfred
    van den Bemt, Bart
    van den Hoogen, Frank
    van der Maas, Aatke
    den Broeder, Alfons
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 73 : 3031 - 3034
  • [8] LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS OF ULTRA-LOW DOSES OF RITUXIMAB IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
    Den Broeder, N.
    Verhoef, L. M.
    De Man, Y. A.
    Kok, M. R.
    Thurlings, R. M.
    Van der Weele, W.
    Van den Bemt, B.
    Van den Hoogen, F.
    Van der Maas, A.
    Den Broeder, A.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 81 : 597 - 598
  • [9] Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Study of Dose Reduction and Withdrawal of Adalimumab and Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis.
    van Herwaarden, Noortje
    van der Maas, Aatke
    Minten, Michiel
    van den Hoogen, Frank H. J.
    van Vollenhoven, Ronald F.
    Bijlsma, Johannes W. J.
    van den Bemt, Bart
    den Broeder, Alfons A.
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 66 : S810 - S811
  • [10] Tumour necrosis factor inhibition versus rituximab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who require biological treatment (ORBIT): an open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority, trial
    Porter, Duncan
    van Melckebeke, Jurgen
    Dale, James
    Messow, C. Martina
    McConnachie, Alexander
    Walker, Andrew
    Munro, Robin
    McLaren, John
    McRorie, Euan
    Packham, Jon
    Buckley, Christopher D.
    Harvie, John
    Taylor, Peter
    Choy, Ernest
    Pitzalis, Costantino
    McInnes, Iain B.
    LANCET, 2016, 388 (10041): : 239 - 247