A Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Rapid Detection of 9 Pathogens Directly From Stools of Travelers With Diarrhea

被引:59
|
作者
Antikainen, Jenni [1 ]
Kantele, Anu [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Pakkanen, Sari H. [2 ,4 ]
Laaveri, Tinja [4 ]
Riutta, Jukka [5 ]
Vaara, Martti [1 ]
Kirveskari, Juha [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Hosp Lab, Dept Bacteriol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Haartman Inst, Dept Bacteriol & Immunol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Clin Med, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Dept Med, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Med Ctr Aava, Aava Travel Clin, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Gastroenteritis; Tourist; Fecal Sample; PCR Assay; ENTEROTOXIGENIC ESCHERICHIA-COLI; DNA MICROARRAY; MULTIPLEX PCR; RESISTANCE; ETIOLOGY; PREVALENCE; MEXICO; WORLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.037
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Every year, 80 million tourists traveling to tropical and subtropical areas contract traveler's diarrhea (TD). Forty percent to 80% of cases are caused by bacteria, yet clinical diagnostic tests are available to identify only a few of the strains that cause TD. We aimed to develop a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay to identify all major pathogens in stool samples. METHODS: We developed a low-cost, high-throughput, multiplex qPCR assay for simultaneous detection of 9 bacterial pathogens in stool samples: Salmonella, Yersinia, Campylobacter, and Vibrio cholerae, as well as Shigella or enteroinvasive Escherichia coli, enterohemorrhagic E coli, enterotoxigenic E coli (ETEC), enteroaggregative E coli (EAEC), and enteropathogenic E coli (EPEC). The assay was validated using positive (n = 245) and negative (n = 243) control strains, as well as preselected positive and negative stool samples. In addition, stool samples were collected from 96 returning travelers with TD. The findings were compared with those from routine diagnostic tests. RESULTS: The assay detected the bacterial strains with 100% sensitivity and specificity, compared with results from the reference tests. Of all stool samples collected from travelers with TD, EPEC was found in 47%, EAEC in 46%, ETEC in 22%, enterohemorrhagic E coli in 7%, Campylobacter in 6%, Shigella or enteroinvasive E coli in 2%, and Salmonella in 2%. Multiple pathogens were found in 37% of all samples. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a low-cost, high-throughput qPCR assay for use in routine diagnostic analysis and research. It detects the pathogenic bacteria most commonly associated with TD in stool samples with 100% sensitivity and specificity, compared with reference methods. The assay requires 4 hours, whereas current detection methods require 1 to 7 days. At least 1 TD pathogen was identified in stool samples from 76% of returning travelers, whereas conventional methods found a pathogen in only 17%. The most commonly detected bacteria were EPEC, EAEC, and ETEC.
引用
收藏
页码:1300 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay
    Uruno, K
    Shibata, I
    Nakane, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 60 (07): : 867 - 870
  • [32] Rapid Quantitative Detection by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction with a Polymer Chip
    Akagi, Yoshinori
    Imamura, Kazuhiko
    Kouno, Takamasa
    Nomura, Shigeru
    Kage, Shuji
    Ema, Mitsuyoshi
    Nishijima, Naoki
    Yamamoto, Kazuki
    Migita, Toshiro
    Shibasaki, Futoshi
    [J]. SENSORS AND MATERIALS, 2015, 27 (05) : 403 - 411
  • [33] Prospective validation of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction for rapid detection of common aneuploidies
    Allingham-Hawkins, Diane J.
    Chitayat, David
    Cirigliano, Vincenzo
    Summers, Anne
    Tokunaga, Jason
    Winsor, Elizabeth
    Chun, Kathy
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (02) : 140 - 147
  • [34] A TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Lawsonia intracellularis in fecal and tissue samples from pigs
    Richter, Barbara
    Ladinig, Andrea
    Nedorost, Nora
    Weissenboeck, Herbert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2010, 22 (01) : 70 - 73
  • [35] Application of multiplex polymerase chain reaction to the detection of pathogens in food
    Perry, Lynda
    Heard, Preciaus
    Kane, Michael
    Kim, Hanyoup
    Savikhin, Sergei
    Dominguez, Wilfredo
    Applegate, Bruce
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RAPID METHODS AND AUTOMATION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 15 (02): : 176 - 198
  • [36] Specificity of a Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Invasive Pneumococcal Disease Identifying Streptococcus pneumoniae Using Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
    Kee, Cordelia
    Fatovich, Daniel M.
    Palladino, Silvano
    Kay, Ian D.
    Pryce, Todd M.
    Flexman, James
    Murray, Ronan
    Waterer, Grant W.
    [J]. CHEST, 2010, 137 (01) : 243 - 244
  • [37] POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION DETECTION OF NONVIABLE BACTERIAL PATHOGENS
    JOSEPHSON, KL
    GERBA, CP
    PEPPER, IL
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 59 (10) : 3513 - 3515
  • [38] Adenovirus polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid diagnosis of conjunctivitis
    Cooper, RJ
    Yeo, AC
    Bailey, AS
    Tullo, AB
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1999, 40 (01) : 90 - 95
  • [39] THE DETECTION OF FOODBORNE PATHOGENS BY THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION (PCR)
    HARRIS, LJ
    GRIFFITHS, MW
    [J]. FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 25 (06) : 457 - 469
  • [40] Detection of animal pathogens by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
    Rodriguez, JM
    [J]. VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1997, 153 (03): : 287 - 305