Impact of Simulation Softwares as Teaching Tools in Engineering Learning - An Instructional Design Choice

被引:0
|
作者
Venkatalakshmi, B. [1 ]
Balakrishnan, Ranjith [1 ]
Saravanan, V. [1 ]
Renold, A. Pravin [1 ]
机构
[1] VEC, TIFAC CORE Pervas Comp Technol, Madras 66, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON2016) | 2016年
关键词
Course outcome (CO); Programme Specific Outcome (PSO); Instructional Design; Learner-centric; Teaching aid and Simulation tools;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Quality Engineering Education has been identified as the foremost thrust area in India. The thrust is mainly due to the new establishment/enrichment of various core engineering industry sectors like Automobile, Healthcare, Agriculture, Avionics, Structural, Telecommunication and Mobile Technologies. Currently even though the country graduates a bulk volume of engineers every year, a major composition of this volume is drained to IT service sectors for employment. To enhance the above thrust of the country many engineering education institutions started focusing on quality of the offered education in terms of numerical ability, creativity and design ability of engineers. The Course Outcomes and Programme Specific Outcomes have been designed with the above focus as a guideline. More emphasis on integration of technology into instruction with learner-centric approach is encouraged. Simulation tools as teaching aids will enrich the understanding ability of the learner. In this work the confidence level of the learners to attain the course level objectives through simulation based teaching pedagogy has been explored. The survey records ensure the impact of this innovative instructional design for the desired course outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 873
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of Simulation-based and Hands-on Teaching Methodologies on Students' Learning in an Engineering Technology Program
    Taher, Mohammed Taqiuddin
    Khan, Ahmed S.
    2014 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2014,
  • [42] Effectiveness of blended instructional design based on active learning in a graphic engineering course
    Olmedo-Torre, Noelia
    Martinez, Maria Martinez
    Pena, Marta
    COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2021, 29 (04) : 810 - 837
  • [43] Learning support tools for developing spatial abilities in engineering design
    Contero, Manuel
    Naya, Ferran
    Company, Pedro
    Saorin, Jose Luis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2006, 22 (03) : 470 - 477
  • [44] From teaching towards learning in flowsheeting and simulation in chemical engineering
    Bálint, A
    Tátrai, F
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 23 : S619 - S622
  • [45] Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design
    Robertson, B. F.
    Radcliffe, D. F.
    COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2009, 41 (03) : 136 - 146
  • [46] Exploring Artificial Intelligence Tools and Their Potential Impact to Instructional Design Workflows and Organizational Systems
    Bolick A.D.
    da Silva R.L.
    TechTrends, 2024, 68 (1) : 91 - 100
  • [47] ASSESSING HOW DIGITAL DESIGN TOOLS AFFECT LEARNING OF ENGINEERING DESIGN CONCEPTS
    Stroble, Jacquelyn K.
    Stone, Robert B.
    Watkins, Steve E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 8, PTS A AND B, 2010, : 467 - 476
  • [48] Network Engineering Project Design of Teaching Based on Process Simulation
    Fang, Fang
    Lu, Yiqin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (ICETMS 2013), 2013, : 1205 - 1208
  • [49] INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO TEACHING ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN WITH THE UTILIZATION OF VIRTUAL SIMULATION TOOLS
    Dawson, Maurice
    Valdez, Raul
    INTED2012: INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2012, : 1913 - 1918
  • [50] An Evaluation of the Impact of "Learning Design" on the Distance Learning and Teaching Experience
    Clifton, Grace
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2017, 18 (05): : 277 - 286