The effect of bonding agents on the microleakage and bond strength of sealant in primary teeth

被引:41
|
作者
Tulunoglu, Ö
Bodur, H
Üçtasli, M
Alaçam, A
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pedodont, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00385.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This in vitro study investigated the effect of use of three dentine bonding agents: Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus(R) (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, Minnesota,. U.S.A.), Syntac(R).(Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Optibond Dual Cure(R) (Kerr, Romulus, MI, U.S.A.) on microleakage and shear bond strength of a fissure sealant (Helioseal F(R), Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) bonded to either dry or wet (saliva contaminated) enamels of primary teeth. Newly extracted 112 non-carious-primary teeth were sectioned and embedded in resin blocks. Eight groups were formed for:each test. Each group consisted of 14 specimens. Group 1 and 2: fissure sealant was. applied directly to etched enamel in dry and wet condition, respectively; Group 3 and 4: fissure sealant was applied onto etched and Scotchbond: Multi-Purpose Plus(R) treated enamel in dry and wet condition, respectively; Group 5 and 6: fissure sealant was applied onto etched and Syntac(R) treated enamel in dry and wet condition, respectively; Group 7 and 8: fissure sealant was applied onto etched, and Optibond Dual Cure(R) treated enamel in dry and wet condition, respectively. The results revealed that the use of an enamel-dentine bonding agent under fissure sealant increased the bond strength and decreased the microleakage. The use of enamel-dentine bonding agents under sealant in moisture contaminated conditions gave better results than applying sealant alone onto noncontaminated. teeth. Finally, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus(R) yielded the best results for both tests.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 441
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Shear bond strength and microleakage of an experimental bonding system.
    Marshall, SJ
    Tsunekawa, M
    Chen, DS
    Marshall, GW
    Watanabe, LG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 2957 - 2957
  • [22] Bond strength and microleakage of new enamel/dentin bonding system
    Shiraishi, M
    Narikawa, K
    Inoue, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 939 - 939
  • [23] Effect of aging on bond strength of two bonding agents.
    Özer, F
    Sengun, A
    Ozturk, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A139 - A139
  • [24] THE EFFECT OF BONDING AGENTS ON THE INTERFACIAL BOND STRENGTH OF REPAIRED COMPOSITES
    AZARBAL, P
    BOYER, DB
    CHAN, KC
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 1986, 2 (04) : 153 - 155
  • [25] Effects of blood contamination and hemostatic agents on bond strength in primary teeth dentin
    Erdogan, Y.
    Karayilmaz, H.
    Unal, M.
    Gungor, O.
    Ciftc, Z. Z.
    [J]. NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 23 (08) : 1103 - 1109
  • [26] Effect of Different Etching Times on Pit-and-Fissure Sealant Micro-Shear Bond Strength to the Enamel of Primary Teeth
    Kharouba, Johnny
    Gonoratsky, Anna Annael
    Brosh, Tamar
    Masri, Mahmoud
    Iraqi, Rabea
    Blumer, Sigalit
    [J]. CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (03):
  • [27] Enamel and dentin bond strength and bonding mechanism to dentin of Gluma CPS to primary teeth
    Fritz, U
    GarciaGodoy, F
    Finger, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 1997, 64 (01): : 32 - +
  • [28] Shear bond strength of primary teeth restored with different fragment bonding techniques.
    Mastria, TV
    Wanderley, MT
    Rodrigues, LE
    Rodrigues, CRMD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B110 - B110
  • [29] Does Bonding Approach Influence the Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive to Dentin of Primary Teeth?
    Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa
    Maxnuck Soares, Fabio Zovico
    Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 41 (03) : 214 - 218
  • [30] EFFECT OF COMPOSITE RESIN BOND AGENT ON MICROLEAKAGE AND BOND STRENGTH
    ORTIZ, RF
    PHILLIPS, RW
    SWARTZ, ML
    OSBORNE, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1979, 41 (01): : 51 - 57