Work place location, transport and urban competitiveness: the Oslo case

被引:9
|
作者
Gundersen, Frants [1 ]
Langeland, Ove [1 ]
Aarhaug, Jorgen [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Transport Econ, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Urban competitiveness; attractiveness; workplace location; transport system;
D O I
10.1016/j.trpro.2017.07.020
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
This paper examines where firms and industries locate in the Oslo region, how this relate to land-use and transport needs and, how the interplay between localisation and transport may have impact on urban competitiveness. It focuses on why some parts of a city region or a city, seems to be more attractive for businesses and people than other parts and, discuss if and how the development can be related to location, proximity and accessibility. The paper draws on several theoretical approaches and data sources. The analytical framework builds on economic geography, agglomeration and location theory. Data comes from both quantitative and qualitative sources, such as register data on firms and industries, commuting and travel survey data, interviews with industries and policy makers and planners. The paper discusses some main factors, which may explain the complex relations between urban competitiveness, firm localisation and transport systems. Accessibility and transport system are undoubtedly important for city attractiveness and industrial development and this may vary between industries. An efficient transport system, therefore, is probably necessary but not sufficient for making specific parts of a city attractive for specific industries. Several other location factors related to labour, land, capital, and managerial and technical skills etc., will also shape firm's locations and city attractiveness and competitiveness. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 206
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CORPORATE-STRATEGY, LOCATION OF INVESTMENTS AND COMPETITIVENESS - THE CASE OF TRELLEBORG BOLIDEN
    LOFKVIST, B
    SALLERT, M
    RESOURCES POLICY, 1992, 18 (04) : 283 - 294
  • [32] HOW CHANGING THE LOCATION OF A WORK PLACE AFFECTS PEOPLE'S TRAVEL
    Waygood, E. Owen
    Kitamura, Ryuichi
    Nakai, Shusaku
    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 2007, : 49 - 55
  • [33] Urban competitiveness and agglomeration development: A case study of Perm and Yekaterinburg
    Anoshkina, Ekaterina
    REGIONAL SCIENCE POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 4 (02): : 125 - 137
  • [34] In this number INNOVATION DISTRICTS AND URBAN COMPETITIVENESS: TWO CASE STUDIES
    Angiello, Gennaro
    TEMA-JOURNAL OF LAND USE MOBILITY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 5 (03) : 159 - 165
  • [35] Research and Evaluation on Urban Financial Competitiveness: a Case Study of Jiangsu
    Dong Jinling
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 CONFERENCE ON REGIONAL ECONOMY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2008, : 1470 - 1475
  • [36] Making a place for escort work: A case study
    Maticka-Tyndale, E
    Lewis, J
    Street, M
    JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 2005, 42 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [37] LAUGHTER AND ITS PLACE IN SOCIAL CASE WORK
    Ferguson, Mary R.
    FAMILY, 1930, 11 (01): : 19 - 24
  • [38] Usage of SIMWE model to model urban overland flood: a case study in Oslo
    Li Hong
    Gao Hongkai
    Zhou Yanlai
    Xu Chong-Yu
    Ortega M., Rengifo Z.
    Saelthun, Nils Roar
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 51 (02): : 366 - 380
  • [39] COMPETITIVENESS BETWEEN ROAD AND INLAND WATER TRANSPORT: THE CASE OF MYANMAR
    Nam, Kichan
    Win, Elly
    TRANSPORT PROBLEMS, 2014, 9 (04) : 49 - 61
  • [40] Transport accessibility and port competitiveness: the case of Savona-Vado
    Galaverna, M
    Pozzobon, A
    Sciutto, G
    MARITIME ENGINEERING AND PORTS, 1998, 5 : 291 - 300