A new method to evaluate the accuracy of the sediment source mixing model

被引:3
|
作者
Bai, Lulu [1 ]
Shi, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Kunxia [1 ,2 ]
Li, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zhanbin [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Guoce [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Dejun [2 ]
Sun, Jingmei [2 ]
Min, Zhiqiang [2 ]
Man, Zhiqiang [2 ]
Cui, Lingzhou [3 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Ecohydraul Northwest Arid Reg China, Xian 710048, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Natl Forestry Adm Ecol Hydrol & Disaster P, Xian 710048, Peoples R China
[3] Wenzhou Univ, Coll Life & Environm Sci, Wenzhou 325035, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Check dam; Sediment sources; Model accuracy; Comprehensive evaluation; LOESS PLATEAU; CHECK-DAM; FINGERPRINT PROPERTIES; CATCHMENT; EROSION; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109304
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Soil erosion is the worldly environmental and ecological problems. How to accurately identify the source of the sediment is important for soil and water conservation. Fingerprint identification technology has been widely used in the extraction of sediment source proportion, but currently most of the methods used to evaluate the accuracy of the results are a-good-fit (GOF) or a mean absolute error (MAE). We propose a new method to evaluate the accuracy of the sediment source mixing model and quantitatively evaluate the two sediment source mixing models. A typical check dam in the Loess Plateau was used to evaluate the new method by combining field sampling and numerical simulation. Collins (C) and Modified Hughes mixing (M-H) models were used to quantitatively analyze the sediment sources in the dam-control watershed. The results showed that the optimum composite fingerprints were Mg, Cr, Ni, and TOC, and they had 97.2% discrimination ability. The contribution rates of sediment source from gully, farmland, grassland and branch ditch were 54%, 24%, 15% and 7%, respectively. The M-H mixing model had a higher comprehensive score (2.26) when compared with the C mixing model (2.20). The comprehensive evaluation method could provide an effective scientific theoretical basis for optimal allocations of water and soil conservation in small watersheds.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of mixing models in predicting sediment source contributions
    Haddadchi, Arman
    Olley, Jon
    Laceby, Patrick
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 497 : 139 - 152
  • [2] A MULTIVARIATE MIXING MODEL FOR IDENTIFYING SEDIMENT SOURCE FROM MAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS
    YU, LH
    OLDFIELD, F
    QUATERNARY RESEARCH, 1989, 32 (02) : 168 - 181
  • [3] Sensitivity of fluvial sediment source apportionment to mixing model assumptions: A Bayesian model comparison
    Cooper, Richard J.
    Krueger, Tobias
    Hiscock, Kevin M.
    Rawlins, Barry G.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2014, 50 (11) : 9031 - 9047
  • [4] How to evaluate sediment fingerprinting source apportionments
    Batista, P. V. G.
    Laceby, J. P.
    Evrard, O.
    JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2022, 22 (04) : 1315 - 1328
  • [5] How to evaluate sediment fingerprinting source apportionments
    P. V. G. Batista
    J. P. Laceby
    O. Evrard
    Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2022, 22 : 1315 - 1328
  • [6] A deconvolutional Bayesian mixing model approach for river basin sediment source apportionment
    William H. Blake
    Pascal Boeckx
    Brian C. Stock
    Hugh G. Smith
    Samuel Bodé
    Hari R. Upadhayay
    Leticia Gaspar
    Rupert Goddard
    Amy T. Lennard
    Ivan Lizaga
    David A. Lobb
    Philip N. Owens
    Ellen L. Petticrew
    Zou Zou A. Kuzyk
    Bayu D. Gari
    Linus Munishi
    Kelvin Mtei
    Amsalu Nebiyu
    Lionel Mabit
    Ana Navas
    Brice X. Semmens
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [7] A deconvolutional Bayesian mixing model approach for river basin sediment source apportionment
    Blake, William H.
    Boeckx, Pascal
    Stock, Brian C.
    Smith, Hugh G.
    Bode, Samuel
    Upadhayay, Hari R.
    Gaspar, Leticia
    Goddard, Rupert
    Lennard, Amy T.
    Lizaga, Ivan
    Lobb, David A.
    Owens, Philip N.
    Petticrew, Ellen L.
    Kuzyk, Zou Zou A.
    Gari, Bayu D.
    Munishi, Linus
    Mtei, Kelvin
    Nebiyu, Amsalu
    Mabit, Lionel
    Navas, Ana
    Semmens, Brice X.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [8] A new method to evaluate order and accuracy of inaccurately and incompletely reproduced movement sequences
    Johannes Drever
    Andreas Straube
    Thomas Eggert
    Behavior Research Methods, 2011, 43 : 269 - 277
  • [9] A new method to evaluate order and accuracy of inaccurately and incompletely reproduced movement sequences
    Drever, Johannes
    Straube, Andreas
    Eggert, Thomas
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2011, 43 (01) : 269 - 277
  • [10] An epidemic model to evaluate the homogeneous mixing assumption
    Turnes, P. P., Jr.
    Monteiro, L. H. A.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN NONLINEAR SCIENCE AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, 2014, 19 (11) : 4042 - 4047