A Comparative Assessment of Software Metrics Tools

被引:0
|
作者
Mshelia, Yusuf U. [1 ]
Apeh, Simon T. [1 ]
Edoghogho, Olaye [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Benin, Fac Engn, Dept Comp Engn, Benin, Nigeria
关键词
Software metrics; tools; quality; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In the recurrent monitoring of software quality, numerous quality metrics tools have evolved in response to the progressive need in software metrics evolution. Most of these tools, however, are developed to the constraints of system requirements, platform restrictions and/ or organizational definitions. Consequent open-ended application queries arise from software metrics and their corresponding tools' proliferation: what are the effects of one tool's execution over another? What are the output file format extensions and their associations with real environment and/ or tools? Are their file associations flexible and easily accessible? How possible is it to successfully run a needed combination of these tools on a computer system? It is apparent that these tools are run differently on their host platforms. This paper presents feature reviews of software metrics tools' execution descriptions, their platforms and implications on host system to an aggregate result ratio of 3: 2 in the average uniform to non-uniform result pattern of the 15 characteristics studied.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using software metrics tools for maintenance decisions: A classroom exercise
    Marshall, AD
    Katchabaw, MJ
    Bauer, MA
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ASSESSMENT OF SOFTWARE TOOLS, 1996, : 47 - 58
  • [22] Do Internal Software Quality Tools Measure Validated Metrics?
    Nilson, Mayra
    Antinyan, Vard
    Gren, Lucas
    PRODUCT-FOCUSED SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, PROFES 2019, 2019, 11915 : 637 - 648
  • [23] SOFTWARE PROCESS FLIGHT SIMULATION - DYNAMIC MODELING TOOLS AND METRICS
    RUBIN, HA
    JOHNSON, M
    YOURDON, E
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1995, 12 (03) : 40 - 52
  • [24] Software Dependability Assessment Using DevOps Metrics
    Popentiu-Vladicescu, Florin
    Albeanu, Grigore
    2022 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, ICBIM, 2022, : 168 - 172
  • [25] Integrating metrics and models for software risk assessment
    Hudepohl, JP
    Khoshgoftaar, TM
    Mayrand, J
    SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE RELIABILITY ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 93 - 98
  • [26] Comparative Analysis of Modularity Metrics for Evaluating Evolutionary Software
    Lee, Ki-Seong
    Lee, Chan-Gun
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEMS, 2015, E98D (02): : 439 - 443
  • [27] Comparative Analysis of Component Based Software Engineering Metrics
    Narang, Kiran
    Goswami, Puneet
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CONFLUENCE 2018 ON CLOUD COMPUTING, DATA SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, : 1 - 6
  • [28] Questioning Software Maintenance Metrics: A Comparative Case Study
    Sjoberg, Dag I. K.
    Anda, Bente
    Mockus, Audris
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM-IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND MEASUREMENT (ESEM'12), 2012, : 107 - 110
  • [29] A Broad Comparative Evaluation of Software Debloating Tools
    Brown, Michael D.
    Meily, Adam
    Fairservice, Brian
    Sood, Akshay
    Dorn, Jonathan
    Kilmer, Eric
    Eytchison, Ronald
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD USENIX SECURITY SYMPOSIUM, SECURITY 2024, 2024, : 3927 - 3943
  • [30] Clinical metrics and tools for provider assessment and tracking of trigonocephaly
    Leclair, Nathan K.
    Chern, Joshua
    Ahn, Edward S.
    Chamis, Megan
    Paro, Mitch R.
    Lambert, William A.
    Stoltz, Petronella
    Hersh, David S.
    Martin, Jonathan E.
    Bookland, Markus J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2023, 32 (01) : 82 - 90